Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Civil Procedure (5)
- Law and Economics (4)
- Litigation (4)
- Business Organizations Law (2)
- Commercial Law (2)
-
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Contracts (2)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (2)
- Labor and Employment Law (2)
- Legal Profession (2)
- Legal Remedies (2)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (1)
- Business (1)
- Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics (1)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Courts (1)
- Economics (1)
- Internet Law (1)
- Judges (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legal Biography (1)
- Legal Education (1)
- Legal Studies (1)
- Legal Theory (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Religion Law (1)
- Securities Law (1)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (1)
- Supreme Court of the United States (1)
- Institution
-
- DePaul University (2)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (1)
-
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- George Washington University Law School (1)
- Louisiana State University Law Center (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- New York Law School (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- University of Michigan Law School (1)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (1)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (1)
- University of Richmond (1)
- Wayne State University (1)
- William & Mary Law School (1)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- All Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (2)
- College of Law Faculty (2)
- Faculty Publications (2)
- Journal Articles (2)
-
- Articles (1)
- Articles & Chapters (1)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (1)
- Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar (1)
- Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Faculty Works (1)
- GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works (1)
- Hannah Buxbaum (2011-2013 Interim) (1)
- Law & Economics Working Papers (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (1)
- Scholarly Works (1)
Articles 1 - 22 of 22
Full-Text Articles in Law
Class Actions And Private Antitrust Litigation, Albert H. Choi, Kathryn E. Sprier
Class Actions And Private Antitrust Litigation, Albert H. Choi, Kathryn E. Sprier
Law & Economics Working Papers
When firms collude and charge supra-competitive prices, consumers can bring antitrust lawsuits against the firms. When the litigation cost is low, firms accept the cost as just another cost of doing business, whereas when the cost is high, the firms lower the price to deter litigation. Class action is modeled as a mechanism that allows plaintiffs and attorneys to obtain economies of scale. We show that class actions, and the firms' incentive to block them, may or may not be socially desirable. Agency problems, settlement, fee-shifting, treble damages, public enforcement, and sustaining collusion through repeat play are also considered.
The New Qui Tam: A Model For The Enforcement Of Group Rights In A Hostile Era, Myriam E. Gilles, Gary Friedman
The New Qui Tam: A Model For The Enforcement Of Group Rights In A Hostile Era, Myriam E. Gilles, Gary Friedman
Articles
The present Administration has made clear it has no interest in enforcing statutes designed to protect workers, consumers, voters, and others. And, as we have chronicled in prior work, the ability of private litigants to enforce these laws has been undercut by developments in the case law concerning class actions—particularly class-banning arbitration clauses. As these critical enforcement methods recede, will alternative methods of prosecuting claims arise? How might they work? Are they politically and fiscally sustainable? We focus here on a promising approach just now coming into view: qui tam legislation authorizing private citizens to bring representative claims on behalf …
Class Actions In Canada: The Promise And Reality Of Access To Justice, Camille Cameron
Class Actions In Canada: The Promise And Reality Of Access To Justice, Camille Cameron
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
Class actions have found their way into the fabric of Canada’s civil justice system. Class action legislation has been in place in Ontario for 27 years and in British Columbia and Quebec for 25 and 40 years respectively. Trial and appellate courts have had many opportunities to deal with and develop the law of class actions. Notwithstanding their longevity, however, there is little qualitative and empirical research to test many of the justice claims that are made in favour of, and the criticisms that are levelled at, class actions. This is the unsettled terrain into which Professor Kalajdzic ventures. Her …
Lead Plaintiff Incentives In Aggregate Litigation, Charles R. Korsmo, Minor Myers
Lead Plaintiff Incentives In Aggregate Litigation, Charles R. Korsmo, Minor Myers
Faculty Publications
The lead plaintiff role holds out considerable promise in promoting the deterrence and compensation goals of aggregate litigation. The prevailing approach to compensating lead plaintiffs, however, provides no real incentive for a lead plaintiff to bring claims on behalf of a broader group. The policy challenge is to induce sophisticated parties to press claims not in their individual capacity but instead in a representative capacity, conferring a positive externality on all class members by identifying attractive claims, financing ongoing litigation, and managing the work of attorneys. We outline what an active and engaged lead plaintiff could add to the civil …
Martyrdom And Religious Freedom, Christopher C. Lund
Martyrdom And Religious Freedom, Christopher C. Lund
Law Faculty Research Publications
No abstract provided.
Boilerplate’S False Dichotomy, James Gibson
Boilerplate’S False Dichotomy, James Gibson
Law Faculty Publications
The argument against enforcing boilerplate contracts (contracts that no one reads) seems clear. Indeed, if this were a court case we would say that the jury is in; the evidence against boilerplate is overwhelming. Yet the judge has yet to render judgment. Courts continue to enforce boilerplate terms, and even those scholars who have exposed boilerplate as an emperor with no clothes are reluctant to gaze upon its nakedness and condemn its use.
This reluctance originates in an assumption that pervades the boilerplate debate—namely, that courts and commentators alike view boilerplate as necessary to the modern transaction. When asked to …
Constitutionalizing Class Certification, Margaret S. Thomas
Constitutionalizing Class Certification, Margaret S. Thomas
Journal Articles
While class actions have been in decline in federal mass tort litigation since at least the 1990s, a quiet shift has been occurring in their landscape in state courts. Although most scholarly attention has been focused on federal courts and on the U.S. Supreme Court’s reworking of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 in the aftermath of the Class Action Fairness Act, state supreme courts have been engaged in a little-noticed but tremendously important battle over the future of class certification.
Defendants in non-removable class actions in state courts have increasingly shifted their arguments against class certification from objections based …
Tyson Foods, Inc. V. Bouaphakeo: The Use Of Statistical Evidence In Class Actions, Wenbo Zhang
Tyson Foods, Inc. V. Bouaphakeo: The Use Of Statistical Evidence In Class Actions, Wenbo Zhang
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar
Statistical analysis potentially plays an important role in class-action litigation, but the use of such evidence is limited at the class-certification stage of such suits. This Commentary previews an upcoming Supreme Court case that deals with the question of whether inferential evidence may be used to certify a class in a class-action lawsuit. Because this case deals with a violation of a duty, imposed by statute, on the defendant, this Commentary argues that under existing precedent, inferential statistical evidence is appropriate for determining the question of class-certification.
Lead Plaintiffs And Lead Counsel In Deal Litigation, David H. Webber
Lead Plaintiffs And Lead Counsel In Deal Litigation, David H. Webber
Faculty Scholarship
The shareholder lawsuit is the primary vehicle for enforcing corporate law. While closely related fields like securities regulation rely on private shareholder lawsuits to supplement the enforcement work of public regulators like the Securities Exchange Commission, corporate law enforcement depends largely on private rights of action brought by aggrieved investors and their lawyers. The purpose of these lawsuits is straightforward: to induce corporate fiduciaries like boards and managers to abide by the duties of loyalty and care in overseeing the corporation. There are many situations that implicate these fiduciary duties, but none that are as fraught with conflict and temptation …
Jack B. Weinstein: Judicial Entrepreneur, Jeffrey B. Morris
Jack B. Weinstein: Judicial Entrepreneur, Jeffrey B. Morris
Scholarly Works
The University of Miami Law Review's 2014 Symposium, Leading from Below, honored Judge Jack B. Weinstein for his extraordinary career as a private practitioner, government lawyer, advisor to legislators and executive officials, major legal scholar, and federal district judge for over forty-seven years. It also offered the possibility of pausing for several days to consider the significance of the federal district courts more generally.
This article is intended to look at the career of one very well regarded judge through spectacles that offer a different vantage point on a judicial career. Those spectacles-the concept of judicial entrepreneurship-seem to be particularly …
Idea Class Actions After Wal-Mart V. Dukes, Mark Weber
Idea Class Actions After Wal-Mart V. Dukes, Mark Weber
College of Law Faculty
Wal-Mart v. Dukes overturned the certification of a class of a million and a half female employees alleging sex discrimination in Wal-Mart’s salary and promotion decisions. The Supreme Court ruled that the case did not satisfy the requirement that a class have a common question of law or fact, and said that the remedy sought was not the type of relief available under the portion of the class action rule permitting mandatory class actions. Over the last two years, courts have struggled with how to apply the ruling, especially how to apply it beyond its immediate context of employment discrimination …
The John E. Schiller Chair In Legal Ethics Inaugural Lecture April 20, 2011 Program
The John E. Schiller Chair In Legal Ethics Inaugural Lecture April 20, 2011 Program
Hannah Buxbaum (2011-2013 Interim)
No abstract provided.
The Price Of Access To The Civil Courts In Australia: Old Problems And New Solutions - A Commercial Litigation Funding Case Study, Camille Cameron
The Price Of Access To The Civil Courts In Australia: Old Problems And New Solutions - A Commercial Litigation Funding Case Study, Camille Cameron
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
In the past decade litigation funding companies have assumed an increasingly prominent role in commercial litigation and class actions in Australia. The growth of commercial litigation funding is a predictable response to various features of Australia’s costs and fee allocation rules and practices, including the “loser pays” rule, the prohibition on lawyer’s charging contingency fees, the hourly billing practices of lawyers, and the open-ended and unpredictable nature of much civil litigation. This chapter explores the growth of commercial litigation funding in Australia and uses it as a window through which to view how Australia’s costs and fee allocation rules operate …
Optimal Class Size, Opt-Out Rights, And "Indivisible" Remedies, Jay Tidmarsh, David Betson
Optimal Class Size, Opt-Out Rights, And "Indivisible" Remedies, Jay Tidmarsh, David Betson
Journal Articles
Prepared for a Symposium on the ALI’s Aggregate Litigation Project, this paper examines the ALI’s proposal to permit opt-out rights when remedies and “divisible,” but not to permit them when remedies are “indivisible.” Starting from the ground up, the paper employs economic analysis to determine what the optimal size of a class action should be. We demonstrate that, in some circumstances, the optimal size of a class is a class composed of all victims, while in other cases, the optimal size is smaller. We further argue that courts should consider optimal class size in determining whether to certify a class, …
Aggregate Litigation: Critical Perspectives, Roger H. Trangsrud
Aggregate Litigation: Critical Perspectives, Roger H. Trangsrud
GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works
While aggregate litigation has become an integral part of the U.S. civil justice system, it is often the cause of intense controversy among the private bar, the bench, and the academy. In 2009, the American Law Institute completed a project on the Principles of the Law of Aggregate Litigation, whose goal was to identify good procedures for handling aggregate lawsuits. The completion of these Principles spurred a host of reactions from attorneys, judges, and scholars. At a symposium hosted by The George Washington University Law School, the questions that were posed included: What is the optimal level of aggregation? When …
A New Look At The Original Meaning Of The Diversity Clause, Mark Moller
A New Look At The Original Meaning Of The Diversity Clause, Mark Moller
College of Law Faculty
Must a federal court obtain the power to bind a party before her citizenship becomes relevant to diversity jurisdiction under Article III? For a long time conventional wisdom has assumed the answer is "no": Article III allows Congress to authorize diversity jurisdiction based on the citizenship of persons beyond a court's power to bind at the time jurisdiction is tested. Congress, in turn, has acted on this assumption. Key provisions of the most ambitious, and controversial, expansion of diversity jurisdiction in the last decade, the 2005 Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA), hinge diversity jurisdiction on the citizenship of persons conventionally …
Megacases, Diversity, And The Elusive Goal Of Workplace Reform, Nancy Levit
Megacases, Diversity, And The Elusive Goal Of Workplace Reform, Nancy Levit
Faculty Works
Employment discrimination class action suits are part of a new wave of structural reform litigation. Like their predecessors - the school desegregation cases in the 1950s, the housing and voting inequalities cases in the 1960s, prison conditions suits in the 1970s, and environmental lawsuits since then - these are systemic challenges to major institutions affecting large segments of the public. This article explores the effectiveness of various employment discrimination remedies in reforming workplace cultures, promoting corporate accountability, and implementing real diversity.
Reviewing the architecture and aftermath of consent decrees in five major employment discrimination cases - the cases against Shoney's, …
Hybrid Class Actions, Dual Certification, And Wage Law Enforcement In The Federal Courts, Andrew Brunsden
Hybrid Class Actions, Dual Certification, And Wage Law Enforcement In The Federal Courts, Andrew Brunsden
Articles & Chapters
Hybrid wage-and-hour class actions, which combine a Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA ') opt-in collective action and a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 23 opt-out class action in a single civil action, demonstrate the unusual interplay of opt-in and opt-out rules. The hybrid class action, and its viability as a mechanism for wage law enforcement, raises fundamental questions as to who participates in lawsuits, how we should hold employers accountable for wage-and-hour noncompliance, and the role of the federal courts in enforcing public rights. An opt-in rule tends to produce low participation rates, while an opt-out rule tends to …
Aggregation On The Couch: The Strategic Uses Of Ambiguity And Hypocrisy, Stephen B. Burbank
Aggregation On The Couch: The Strategic Uses Of Ambiguity And Hypocrisy, Stephen B. Burbank
All Faculty Scholarship
In this Essay, Professor Burbank comments on the essays by Professors Nagareda and Issacharoff. Welcoming the opportunity to revisit the interplay between procedure and substantive law and the question of democratic accountability that Professor Nagareda’s essay presents, Professor Burbank concludes that the parts of that essay are greater than the whole. He finds that Professor Nagareda’s pursuit of unifying themes and a general normative theory leads to inconsistencies in classification between procedure and substance and to an impoverished vision of institutional legitimacy. Professor Burbank voices concern that this quest, which is also evident in the current draft of the American …
Thwarting Ethical Violations With Web Site Disclaimers, Walter Effross
Thwarting Ethical Violations With Web Site Disclaimers, Walter Effross
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
No abstract provided.
An Historical Analysis Of The Binding Effect Of Class Suits (Co-Authored With G. Hazard Jr. & J. Gedid), Stephen D. Sowle
An Historical Analysis Of The Binding Effect Of Class Suits (Co-Authored With G. Hazard Jr. & J. Gedid), Stephen D. Sowle
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Prospective Remedies In Constitutional Adjudication, Doug R. Rendleman
Prospective Remedies In Constitutional Adjudication, Doug R. Rendleman
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.