Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Courts (2)
- Health Law and Policy (2)
- Judges (2)
- Arts and Humanities (1)
- Climate (1)
-
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Earth Sciences (1)
- Environmental Health and Protection (1)
- Environmental Policy (1)
- Environmental Sciences (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- Hydrology (1)
- Indigenous Studies (1)
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (1)
- Intellectual Property Law (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Law and Politics (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Medical Jurisprudence (1)
- Natural Resources Management and Policy (1)
- Natural Resources and Conservation (1)
- Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology (1)
- Physical Sciences and Mathematics (1)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (1)
- Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies (1)
- Social Policy (1)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (1)
- Institution
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Slides: Scarcity And Bc's Water Future - The Evolution Of Western Water Law?, Oliver M. Brandes
Slides: Scarcity And Bc's Water Future - The Evolution Of Western Water Law?, Oliver M. Brandes
Coping with Water Scarcity in River Basins Worldwide: Lessons Learned from Shared Experiences (Martz Summer Conference, June 9-10)
Oliver M. Brandes, University of Victoria
28 slides
Carter, Medical Aid In Dying, And Mature Minors, Constance Macintosh
Carter, Medical Aid In Dying, And Mature Minors, Constance Macintosh
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
The Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Carter v Canada (AG) decriminalized medical aid in dying in certain defined circumstances. One of those circumstances is that the person seeking assistance be an “adult.” This article argues that the regulatory response to this decision must approach the idea of “adult” in terms of the actual medical-decisional capacity of any given individual, and not rely upon age as a substitute for capacity. This article surveys jurisdictions where minors are included in physician-assisted dying regimes, and identifies what little empirical evidence exists regarding requests from minors. The heart of the article considers the …
Carrying On The Tradition: Justice Rothstein's Contribution To Canadian Tax Law, William Neil Brooks, Kim Brooks
Carrying On The Tradition: Justice Rothstein's Contribution To Canadian Tax Law, William Neil Brooks, Kim Brooks
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
In this article, we review a selection of Justice Rothstein’s tax judgments with the object of making two observations about his contribution to Canadian tax law. First, Justice Rothstein, who was appointed to the Supreme Court two years after Justice Iacobucci retired, and in many ways stepped into his shoes as the Court’s tax judge, continued Justice Iacobucci’s formalist tradition. We provide evidence of Justice Rothstein’s formalist approach by examining one case he rendered while serving on the Federal Court Trial Division, Neuman; and two cases that were decided when he sat on the Federal Court of Appeal, Singleton and …
Judging The Social Sciences In Carter V Canada (Ag), Jodi Lazare
Judging The Social Sciences In Carter V Canada (Ag), Jodi Lazare
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
This paper examines a recent example of evidence-based decision making affecting social policy at the trial court level. It offers a close reading of Carter v Canada (AG), decided by the British Columbia Supreme Court, and of Justice Lynn Smith's careful scrutiny of the social science evidence when invalidating the Criminal Code prohibition on assistance in dying. Drawing on literature which examines the legal system's use of social science evidence and expert witnesses, this paper suggests that Justice Smith's treatment of the evidence in Carter provides an example of skilled judicial treatment of the extensive amounts of social science evidence …
Law, Politics, And Legacy Building At The Mclachlin Court In 2014, Jamie Cameron
Law, Politics, And Legacy Building At The Mclachlin Court In 2014, Jamie Cameron
Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper Series
This Article was written for Osgoode Hall Law School’s annual Constitutional Cases conference, and provides the keynote overview of the McLachlin Court’s 2014 constitutional jurisprudence. The Court’s 2014 constitutional decisions (Appointment and Senate References; Tsilqot’in Nation; Trial Lawyers) and restrictions on Mr. Big operations (Hart), in combination with a tsunami of Charter decisions early in 2015 (the 2015 Labour Trilogy; Carter v. Canada; R. v. Nur; and others), made this a legacy-building year. More than an overview, this Article probes the nature of the McLachlin Court’s legacy this year and the relationship between legal and political dynamics, to ask: in …
The Limits Of Statutory Interpretation: Towards Explicit Engagement, By The Supreme Court Of Canada, With The Charter Right To Freedom Of Expression In The Context Of Copyright, Graham Reynolds
All Faculty Publications
In its post-2002 copyright jurisprudence, the Supreme Court of Canada has clarified that the Copyright Act grants a significant degree of latitude to non-copyright owning parties to express themselves using copyrighted works. This outcome is attributable neither to the SCC having interpreted provisions of the Copyright Act according to Charter values nor to the SCC having weighed provisions of the Copyright Act against the section 2(b) right to freedom of expression. Rather, it has resulted from the SCC interpreting provisions of the Copyright Act through the lens of the purpose of copyright, as re-articulated by the SCC. The author argues …