Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 23 of 23

Full-Text Articles in Law

Bits, Ippas, Trips And Icsid: Justice For Some, Alphabet Soup For All, Christopher Wadlow Oct 2008

Bits, Ippas, Trips And Icsid: Justice For Some, Alphabet Soup For All, Christopher Wadlow

Christopher Wadlow

Examines the possibility that ICSID (the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes) might be a more favourable forum than the WTO for private party complaints of violations of the TRIPs Agreement, if the state conduct alleged to violate TRIPs amounted to expropriation or breach of the principle of fair and equitable treatment.


Crowning The New King: The Statutory Arbitrator And The Demise Of Judicial Review, Michael H. Leroy Oct 2008

Crowning The New King: The Statutory Arbitrator And The Demise Of Judicial Review, Michael H. Leroy

Michael H LeRoy

Judicial review of arbitration awards is highly deferential, but when does it become rubber stamping? Using original data, I find that federal courts vacated only 4.3 percent of 162 disputed awards. Nearly the same result was observed for a sub-sample of 44 employment discrimination awards under Title VII. By comparison, federal appeals courts in 2006 reversed 12.9 percent of 5,917 rulings made by civil court judges on the merits of legal claims.

Why are the rulings of Article III judges scrutinized more than the awards of citizen-arbitrators? What does this mean when companies can avoid Article III court rulings by …


The Tower Of Bazzle: Why Due Process Requires A Hybrid Model Of Classwide Arbitration, Zachary Allen Oct 2008

The Tower Of Bazzle: Why Due Process Requires A Hybrid Model Of Classwide Arbitration, Zachary Allen

Zachary Allen

During the late 1970s the United States witnessed the beginning of an uncomfortable courtship between two powerful dispute resolution mechanisms: arbitration and the class action. In 2003, the U.S. Supreme Court announced its approval of their marriage, referred to as classwide arbitration, in Green Tree Financial Corporation v. Bazzle. In Bazzle, the Court held that where an arbitration agreement is silent regarding classwide arbitration, the arbitrator—not the court—should interpret the agreement to determine whether it permits classwide arbitration.

Unfortunately, the Court’s blessing was mixed. Bazzle is on infirm ground for two reasons. First, the Court could only muster a 4-1-4 …


Natura Contrattuale O Processuale Dell'arbitrato Irrituale?, Valerio Sangiovanni Oct 2008

Natura Contrattuale O Processuale Dell'arbitrato Irrituale?, Valerio Sangiovanni

Valerio Sangiovanni

No abstract provided.


State Consent, Investor Interests And The Future Of Investment Arbitration: Reanalyzing The Jurisdiction Of Investor-State Tribunals In Hard Cases, Paul M. Blyschak Sep 2008

State Consent, Investor Interests And The Future Of Investment Arbitration: Reanalyzing The Jurisdiction Of Investor-State Tribunals In Hard Cases, Paul M. Blyschak

Paul M Blyschak

While the international investment regime has enjoyed an extended period of enthusiastic subscription, this euphoria has begun to recede in some quarters. Although sovereign consent to waive immunity is at the heart of investor-State arbitration, many states feel that this consent has been illegitimately expanded. In this regard, this thesis examines the degree to which the interpretive approach taken to state consent to arbitration can affect whether an investment tribunal will assert jurisdiction over an investment dispute. Investor-State tribunals often confront ‘hard cases’ where their authority to decide a dispute is vigorously contested by respondent host states. This thesis examines …


State Consent, Investor Interests And The Future Of Investment Arbitration: Reanalyzing The Jurisdiction Of Investor-State Tribunals In Hard Cases, Paul M. Blyschak Sep 2008

State Consent, Investor Interests And The Future Of Investment Arbitration: Reanalyzing The Jurisdiction Of Investor-State Tribunals In Hard Cases, Paul M. Blyschak

Paul M Blyschak

While the international investment regime has enjoyed an extended period of enthusiastic subscription, this euphoria has begun to recede in some quarters. Although sovereign consent to waive immunity is at the heart of investor-State arbitration, many states feel that this consent has been illegitimately expanded. In this regard, this thesis examines the degree to which the interpretive approach taken to state consent to arbitration can affect whether an investment tribunal will assert jurisdiction over an investment dispute. Investor-State tribunals often confront ‘hard cases’ where their authority to decide a dispute is vigorously contested by respondent host states. This thesis examines …


Should Parties’ Disclosure Requirements For Arbitrators Be Honored By Courts: Positivesoftware Solutions, Inc. V. New Century Mortgage Corporation, Leonard E. Gross, Howard L. Wieder Aug 2008

Should Parties’ Disclosure Requirements For Arbitrators Be Honored By Courts: Positivesoftware Solutions, Inc. V. New Century Mortgage Corporation, Leonard E. Gross, Howard L. Wieder

Leonard E. Gross

In this article, we criticize the decision of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in PositiveSoftware Solutions, Inc. v. New Century Mortgage Corporation. In PositiveSoftware, the court confirmed an arbitration award even though the arbitrator had failed to disclose rather significant facts about his relationship to one of the parties. Our thesis is that courts should enforce the arbitrator disclosure requirements to which the parties have agreed by not confirming arbitration awards when arbitrators fail to comply with those disclosure requirements. In adopting the Federal Arbitration Act, Congress intended to encourage the use of arbitration. The net effect of refusing …


Why Arbitrate? The Questionable Quest For Efficiency In Hallstreet Street Associates, Llc V. Mattel, Inc., 550 U.S. __ (2008), David K. Kessler Jul 2008

Why Arbitrate? The Questionable Quest For Efficiency In Hallstreet Street Associates, Llc V. Mattel, Inc., 550 U.S. __ (2008), David K. Kessler

David K Kessler

The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) makes arbitration agreements between private parties legally enforceable. The policy favoring arbitration underlying the FAA has been justified as serving two ends: it protects freedom of contract, and it creates an efficient alternative dispute resolution system. Previous decisions by the Court have indicated a belief that, when those two goals come into conflict, the result that preserves freedom of contract should prevail. In Hallstreet Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc., however, a recent case involving the Federal Arbitration Act, the Court's decision preserved perceived efficiency at the expense of freedom of contract. The Court held that …


A Economia Da Arbitragem: Escolha Racional E Geração De Valor, Bruno Meyerhof Salama, Antonio Celso Pugliese May 2008

A Economia Da Arbitragem: Escolha Racional E Geração De Valor, Bruno Meyerhof Salama, Antonio Celso Pugliese

Bruno Meyerhof Salama

This article examines the institute of arbitration and its relationship with court activities from the perspective of transactions costs. Its objective is to show how arbitration can reduce the transactions costs in a certain normative environment and contribute to institutional improvement. The costs related to the use arbitration and court proceedings work like a price mechanism: the bigger the cost, the lower the demand (and vice-versa). The institute of arbitration can potentially engender a reduction of transactions costs because of (a) the relative quickness with which it is carried out, (b) the relative neutrality of arbiters, and (c) the specialization …


Why Arbitrate? The Questionable Quest For Efficiency In Hallstreet Street Associates, Llc V. Mattel, Inc., David K. Kessler May 2008

Why Arbitrate? The Questionable Quest For Efficiency In Hallstreet Street Associates, Llc V. Mattel, Inc., David K. Kessler

David K Kessler

The Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) makes arbitration agreements between private parties legally enforceable. The policy favoring arbitration underlying the FAA has been justified as serving two ends: it protects freedom of contract, and it creates an efficient alternative dispute resolution system. Previous decisions by the Court have indicated a belief that, when those two goals come into conflict, the result that preserves freedom of contract should prevail. In Hallstreet Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc., however, a recent case involving the Federal Arbitration Act, the Court’s decision preserved perceived efficiency at the expense of freedom of contract. The Court held that …


Looking Into A Crystal Ball: Courts' Inevitable Refusal To Enforce Parties' Contracts To Expand Judicial Review Of Non-Domestic Arbitral Awards, Eric S. Chafetz Apr 2008

Looking Into A Crystal Ball: Courts' Inevitable Refusal To Enforce Parties' Contracts To Expand Judicial Review Of Non-Domestic Arbitral Awards, Eric S. Chafetz

Eric S. Chafetz

Courts have not addressed whether parties can contract to expand the judicial review provisions in Article (“Art.”) V of the New York Convention (the "NY Convention"). When courts do address the issue, they will rely on the resolution of two prior issues: (1) whether parties can rely on the vacatur provisions in Art. 1 of the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), in a vacatur proceeding under the NY Convention and (2) whether parties can rely on manifest disregard of the law and other grounds of review implied under Art. 1 of the FAA, in a vacatur proceeding under the NY Convention. …


A Strategic Functionalist Approach To International Commercial Mediation, Antonin I. Pribetic Apr 2008

A Strategic Functionalist Approach To International Commercial Mediation, Antonin I. Pribetic

Antonin I. Pribetic

Mediation in the international context is a relatively recent phenomenon. As an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanism, third-party neutral mediation is firmly entrenched in the legal ethos and procedural rules of most common law jurisdictions; such as the United Kingdom, the United States and Canada. However, in the rest of the world, including many European, Latin American and Asian nations with civil law traditions, mediation remains an elusive concept. Some commentators suggest this may be due in part to differences in systemic (i.e. adversarial vs. inquisitorial) and cultural (i.e. mediation vs. conciliation) orientations.

This paper considers whether International Mediation is …


International Commercial Arbitration In Cuba, Kevin S. Tuininga Apr 2008

International Commercial Arbitration In Cuba, Kevin S. Tuininga

Kevin S Tuininga

This article discusses the prospect of international commercial arbitration in Cuba.


Are Contingent-Fee Attorneys Deterred?: How Courts Can More Effectively Police Adhesive Arbitration Agreements, Kenyon Harbison Mar 2008

Are Contingent-Fee Attorneys Deterred?: How Courts Can More Effectively Police Adhesive Arbitration Agreements, Kenyon Harbison

Kenyon D Harbison

If you’re like me, you become bound by a new arbitration agreement almost every day, sometimes without even knowing it. They are included with banking and credit card statements, in most employment contracts, and in most purchase agreements. When we make purchases online we ‘click’ our assent to them without reading them. When we receive them in the mail we signal our assent by failing to opt out. But what happens when we are injured, defrauded, or cheated, try to sue, and find we are instead subject to arbitration? What standards can we expect courts to apply if we challenge …


Risoluzione Di Contrasti Sulla Gestione Di Società, Arbitraggio E Modelli Di Amministrazione, Valerio Sangiovanni Mar 2008

Risoluzione Di Contrasti Sulla Gestione Di Società, Arbitraggio E Modelli Di Amministrazione, Valerio Sangiovanni

Valerio Sangiovanni

No abstract provided.


Ensuring Enforceability & Fairness In The Arbitration Of Employment Disputes, Stacy A. Hickox Feb 2008

Ensuring Enforceability & Fairness In The Arbitration Of Employment Disputes, Stacy A. Hickox

Stacy A. Hickox

Private arbitration of employment law claims has become common in recent years. The Supreme Court has shown a strong preference for requiring that an employee pursue an employment claim through an arbitration program rather than seeking to enforce his or her rights in court. At the same time, legislation has been introduced to try to protect the rights of employees who, without an arbitration program in place, would have the opportunity to assert their statutory rights in court. This article explores what safeguards should be in place to assure that employers can rely on the enforceability of an arbitration program …


Chronicles Of A Failure: From A Renegotiation Clause To Arbitration Of Transnational Contracts, Luigi Russi Jan 2008

Chronicles Of A Failure: From A Renegotiation Clause To Arbitration Of Transnational Contracts, Luigi Russi

ILSU Working Paper Series

The present paper recounts the various steps which parties to a transnational contract containing a renegotiation clause may need to go through, should the circumstances accounted for in the renegotiation clause come to existence. To this end, the article sets off from an outline of the most relevant structural features and functions of renegotiation clauses, and of the typical obligations which may derive therefrom.

Secondly, the paper's focus narrows down to the - by no means infrequent - case of failure to renegotiate in presence of an arbitration clause governing the parties' agreement. In the latter case, in particular, several …


Compelling Mediation In The Context Of Med-Arb Agreements, Sean-Patrick Wilson, David J. Mclean Jan 2008

Compelling Mediation In The Context Of Med-Arb Agreements, Sean-Patrick Wilson, David J. Mclean

Sean-Patrick Wilson

The recent case of Advanced Bodycare v. Thione, 07-12309, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 8584 (11th Cir. Apr. 21, 2008) invited the Eleventh Circuit to explore which types of ADR are considered “arbitration” for purpose of the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 1 (“FAA”). According to the Eleventh Circuit, an agreement to mediate, as well as an agreement to either mediate or arbitrate, falls outside of the FAA’s scope, making the FAA’s remedies unavailing to parties wishing to use its provisions to stay litigation or to compel a single agreement which requires the parties to either mediate or arbitrate. The …


Chronicles Of A Failure: From A Renegotiation Clause To Arbitration Of Transnational Contracts, Luigi Russi Jan 2008

Chronicles Of A Failure: From A Renegotiation Clause To Arbitration Of Transnational Contracts, Luigi Russi

Bocconi Legal Papers

The present paper recounts the various steps which parties to a transnational contract containing a renegotiation clause may need to go through, should the circumstances accounted for in the renegotiation clause come to existence. To this end, the article sets off from an outline of the most relevant structural features and functions of renegotiation clauses, and of the typical obligations which may derive therefrom.

Secondly, the paper's focus narrows down to the - by no means infrequent - case of failure to renegotiate in presence of an arbitration clause governing the parties' agreement. In the latter case, in particular, several …


From Court-Surrogate To Regulatory Tool: Re-Framing The Empirical Study Of Employment Arbitration, W. Mark C. Weidemaier Dec 2007

From Court-Surrogate To Regulatory Tool: Re-Framing The Empirical Study Of Employment Arbitration, W. Mark C. Weidemaier

W. Mark C. Weidemaier

A growing body of empirical research explores the use of arbitration to resolve employment disputes., typically by comparing arbitration to litigation using relatively traditional outcome measures: who wins, how much, and how quickly. On the whole, this research suggests that employees fare reasonably well in arbitration. Yet there remain sizeable gaps in our knowledge. This Article explores these gaps with two goals in mind. The first and narrower goal is to explain why it remains exceedingly difficult to assess the relative fairness of arbitration and litigation. The outcome research does not account for a variety of “filtering” mechanisms that influence …


Do Cognitive Biases Affect Adjudication?: A Study Of Labor Arbitrators (With Monica Biernat), Martin H. Malin, Monica Biernat Dec 2007

Do Cognitive Biases Affect Adjudication?: A Study Of Labor Arbitrators (With Monica Biernat), Martin H. Malin, Monica Biernat

Martin H. Malin

Labor arbitrators were presented with four cases to decide, each involving a challenge to discipline or discharge of an employee resulting from a work-family conflict. Arbitrators were randomly given versions of the cases in which the gender and one other characteristivc of the employee were varied. The results showed little evidence of direct gender bias in decision-making but did reflect bias against single parents and employees with eldercare, as opposed to childcare, responsibilities. Implications for other adjudicators, including judges, jurors and administrative agency officials are discussed.


What Makes Securities Arbitration Different From Other Consumer And Employment Arbitration?, Stephen Ware Dec 2007

What Makes Securities Arbitration Different From Other Consumer And Employment Arbitration?, Stephen Ware

Stephen Ware

This short piece emphasizes what makes consumer and employment arbitration in the securities industry different from consumer and employment arbitration generally. Securities law imposes non-contractual duties to arbitrate on both broker-dealers and securities employees. I believe these laws are bad policy because they restrict contractual freedom. I conclude that securities arbitration should be contractual, like other arbitration.


Arbitration Law's Separability Doctrine After Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. V. Cardegna, Stephen Ware Dec 2007

Arbitration Law's Separability Doctrine After Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. V. Cardegna, Stephen Ware

Stephen Ware

The recent case of Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna, is only the second Supreme Court decision applying the separability doctrine and it comes nearly forty years after the Court's first separability decision, Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Manufacturing Co. Arbitration's tremendous growth during those forty years - and the arrival of Buckeye - make this an opportune time to assess the current state of the separability doctrine. In doing that, this article will analyze Prima Paint and Buckeye and discuss the separability issues they leave unresolved. Finally, this article will critique the separability doctrine and call for …