Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Civil Law (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Cognitive Psychology (1)
- Commercial Law (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
-
- Labor and Employment Law (1)
- Law and Gender (1)
- Law and Psychology (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legal Education (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Legal Writing and Research (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Psychology (1)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (1)
- Sexuality and the Law (1)
- Social Psychology (1)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (1)
- Torts (1)
- Institution
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Does Incommensurability Matter? Incommensurability And Public Policy, Richard Warner
Does Incommensurability Matter? Incommensurability And Public Policy, Richard Warner
Richard Warner
No abstract provided.
Critical Of Race Theory: Race, Reason, Merit And Civility, Nancy Levit
Critical Of Race Theory: Race, Reason, Merit And Civility, Nancy Levit
Nancy Levit
A hazard lurks in any but the most careful representation of another's viewpoint. Call it "slippage" or the "essentialist error," the point is that communication rarely does complete justice to its object. The problem is compounded when the communication is mediated. We all know that between a story and its retelling, something will get lost in translation. Consider feminism, gay legal theory, and critical race theory, and their depictions in academic journals and the popular media. Newspapers and news magazines have recently published a spate of academic trash talk accusing critical race theorists of "playing the race card" and indulging …
Introducción Al Derecho Nuevo, Jorge Carlos Adame
Introducción Al Derecho Nuevo, Jorge Carlos Adame
Jorge Adame Goddard
No abstract provided.
Foreword, Robert Lipkin
Taking Justice Thomas Seriously, John Eastman
Taking Justice Thomas Seriously, John Eastman
John C. Eastman
Substantive Review of Scott Gerber's book, First Principles: The Jurisprudence of Clarence Thomas (New York University Press, 1999). This review praises Gerber's recognition that Justice Thomas has articulated a consistent and thoughtful original theory view of the Constitution, distinct from the original practice, most positivist view of constitutional interpretation advanced by Justice Antonin Scalia and the late Chief Justice William Rehnquist. It also applauds the effort to take seriously Justice Thomas's jurisprudence, even while it takes Gerber to task for misunderstanding at times the full depth of that jurisprudence. Most notably, the article challenges Gerber's critique of Justice Thomas's Establishment …