Law Commons^™

Doing The Right Thing, The Right Way, The First Time: Decision-Making In Public And Private Arenas Regarding The Use Of Service Animals, Maureen E. Lally-Green, Annemarie Harr Eagle Esq., Bridget M. Green

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.

Playing The Game Of International Law, Uri Weiss, Joseph Agassi

Touro Law Review

In the realist game of international negotiations, each state attempts to promote their interest regardless of international law. Thus, it is negotiations in the shadow of the sword, i.e., a negotiation in which each side knows that if the parties will not achieve an agreement, the alternative may be a war, and thus the bargaining position of each party is a function of their capacities in a case of war. Negotiation in the shadow of international law is an alternative to it: in this alternative the parties negotiate according to their international legal rights. It reduces injustice and incentive to …

Retroactivity In Administrative Decisions In U.A.E. (Theoretical & Applied Study) By Farouk El Arabi

UAEU Law Journal

The study deals with retroactivity in administrative decisions in U.A.E. It encompasses three parameters; first retroactivity in law, second retroactivity in administrative decisions, the third parameter concerns retroactivity according to legislature applied in U.A.E. The first parameter acts as an introduction to the next two which comprises the main issues in this study. The first parameter briefly discusses the principles of non-retroactivity of laws and whether legislature may overlook this principle. The second parameter categorizes administrative decisions. Into individual and organizational, the latter being subdivided into revealing and institutional laws. The effect of this subdivision on non-retroactivity is then discussed, …

Objective Conditions For Stay Of Execution Of Administrative Decisions In The French State Council's Decisions And Jordanian High Court Of Justice: A Comparative Study, Musa Shehada

UAEU Law Journal

The purpose of this research is to analyze the required objective conditions to accept the application to stay the execution of administrative decisions objected for cancellation in the judgement of the French State Council and Jordanian High court of justice. This study concludes that the stay of execution can't exist except in face of final administrative decisions and there should be an interest for the objector and irreparable damage in case of execution of the decision and the application for stay of execution should stand on serious reasons.

In conclusion the study invites the Jordanian Administrative Judge to specify the …

Professional Insufficiency As A Ground Of Dismissal From A Public Post: “A Study Of The Decisions Of The French Council Of State & The Administrative Appealate Courts”, Musa Shehada

UAEU Law Journal

The aim of this study is to examine the professional insufficiency as a ground of a decision of the French Council of State and the Administrative Appeallate Courts dismissing a public employee a part from the disciplinary measures.

The study indicated that the dismissal of a public employee for professional insufficiency is not restricted to the conduct and behavior exercised by that employee while discharging his job duties or his failure to have good relation with his superiors or colleagues. Due to the dangerous consequences of such dismissal the French lawmaker has provided for a number of guarantees to protect …

The Just Guarantees In The Judges Awards & Decisions – Between The Legitimate Condition And The Lawful Organizing In The Republic Of Yemen Legislation

UAEU Law Journal

This study has surveyed the importance of justice in the modern societies. It focuses on the role of the judiciary and system in Solidifying strengthening justice for the sake of human welfare.

The key element in the study is the role of the judge. In its finest part the study deals with the external factors which influence the judge and which should be avoided to insure justice. It also deals with the judiciary conditions in general such as setting the proper circumstances for trial and some are related to the judge's personality such as being just, knowledgeable, and being male. …

Exceptions Of The Principle Of Imperative Reasoning Of Individual Administrative Decisions In France

UAEU Law Journal

The imperative reasoning of administrative decisions is considered one of the most important landmarks of the policy of administrative clarity. It means that the administration has to be committed to give legal and substantial reasons upon issuing such decisions. Such procedure allows the senior officers to know the reasons of the decision while reviewing the decision addressed to them and influencing their legal positions. Such action achieves understanding and cooperation between the administration and its customers. It enhances the confidence bridges between the two parties and facilitates the administration's task to realize public welfare. This principle was adopted by the …

The Rationale For The Executive Authority To Resort To The Judiciary, Mohamed Farouk Mohammed

UAEU Law Journal

Selecting the state for direct execution is not free from restrictions, as it is imagined; disobeying to every limit, but it has conditions and restrictions the executive power must fulfill before selecting this approach, the executive power recognized this matter recently, so it began to waive practicing this direct execution for condition it estimated in the light of general interest preferring resorting to jurisdiction firstly in spite of bad sense of some police administration that foreign from this field of law supremacy due to effects of this practice.

The administration may refuse resorting to administrative methods to exigent its right …

The Extent Of Constitutional Protection For Public Utilities, Sam Dallah

UAEU Law Journal

Regardless of the role of the State and the extent of its intervention, the public utilities, in its organic dimension connected with the public authority concept and the objective dimension connected with the concept of public activity, is considered one of the main tools by which the state exercises its sovereign functions and interventions.

Given the changes that have occurred in the role of the State, which led either to more intervention or more of its withdrawal from some sectors, and the subsequent crisis in the concept of public utilities, in addition to the emergence of mandate exercises or privatization …

Missouri’S Path Towards “A Meaningful Opportunity For Release.” Should Remedying Unconstitutional Sentences Permit Judicial Review Of Parole Board Decisions?, Kristen S. Spina

Saint Louis University Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Legal Procedure For Registration And Implementation Of The Results Of Public Environmental Control, O. Utegenov

Review of law sciences

The article analyzes the registration issues and implementation of the results of public environmental control. The author analyzes the legal basis for the registration and implementation of the results of public environmental control, national and international scientific literature, as well as the experience of developed countries in the formulation and application of the results of public environmental control. Suggestions have been developed on the main forms for reporting public environmental control results: preparation of a certificate or information and further improvement of legislation on the registration and implementation of public environmental monitoring results.

Remorse, Not Race: Essence Of Parole Release?, Lovashni Khalikaprasad

Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity

No abstract provided.

Applying Maimonides’ Hilkhot Teshuvah–Laws Of Repentance – In The Criminal Law System Of The State Of Israel: An Israeli Judge’S Perspectives, Moshe Drori

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Equity In American And Jewish Law, Itzchak E. Kornfeld , Ph.D.

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Free Appropriate Public Education After Endrew F. V. Douglas County School District (2017), Terrye Conroy, Mitchell L. Yell

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

What Got Into The Court? What Happens Next?, Linda Greenhouse

Maine Law Review

We are now in the midst of an amazing Supreme Court term--more than half-way through on the calendar, far short of halfway through in terms of what has yet to be decided. It's been a roller-coaster term of sorts, beginning with the highly unusual early-September argument in the campaign finance case, followed by a rather quiet fall and winter, and then ending with an April sitting during which the Court will consider, in the context of the country's response to terrorism, cases that are likely to go quite far to define for the modern age the meaning of citizenship and, …

Contemporary Soviet Criminal Law: An Analysis Of The General Principles And Major Institutions Of Post-1958 Soviet Criminal Law, Chris Osakwe

Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law

No abstract provided.

The Influence Of Setting On Supreme Court Religious Expression Decisions, Joseph J. Hemmer Jr.

Communication and Theater Association of Minnesota Journal

The First Amendment prohibits any establishment of religion, a dicta that has been applied in an apparently inconsistent manner by the Supreme Court when called upon to evaluate various forms of verbal and nonverbal religious communication. Court decisions have approved religious prayers and displays in government settings. When such exercises and displays were introduced to the public school academic setting, the Court chose to disallow the practice. An examination of judicial opinions reveals that justices recognize three factors inherent to the academic setting which justify the apparently contradictory decisions. Because of the captive nature of the audience, the presence of …

The Changing Discourse Of The Supreme Court, Stephen M. Johnson

The University of New Hampshire Law Review

[Excerpt] “Academics, judges, and other commentators complain that, for the past few decades, the Justices on the Supreme Court have been increasingly writing opinions that are unreadable for most American citizens. Those critics complain that the opinions are too long and too complex, riddled with incomprehensible multi-part tests. They also attack the style of the opinions and assert that recent opinions are more likely to be written in a technocratic, rather than persuasive, style.

There seems to be little consensus among the critics regarding why the Justices are writing opinions that are increasingly unreadable. Some attribute it to the increasing …

The Art Of Legal Reasoning And The Angst Of Judging: Of Balls, Strikes, And Moments Of Truth, Timothy P. Terrell

Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy

An essay of only five short paragraphs published several years ago by the noted Harvard paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould about a controversial call by baseball umpire Babe Pinelli provides all the foundation necessary for a thorough investigation of the phenomenon of legal reasoning. The present article contrasts Gould’s analysis of a “strike” with the comment by then-Judge John Roberts at his Supreme Court confirmation hearings that he just wanted to “call [the] balls and strikes,” and through this exchange develops a new approach toward identifying—and teaching—the basic elements of sophisticated legal thinking. This article divides legal reasoning into four interrelated …

Tough Love: Making Residential Decisions For The Incapacitated, Vicki J. Bowers

Marquette Elder's Advisor

When adult children have to make decisions about their parents' living arrangements, difficult choices make have to be made. Bowers considers independent living at home, home sharing, assisted living, continuing care retirement communities (CCRCs), and nursing homes. Consideration of financial ramifications might include private payment, long-term care insurance, reverse mortgages, veteran's benefits, and medical assistance programs.

The Rise And Demise Of The Collective Right Interpretation Of The Second Amendment, David T. Hardy

Cleveland State Law Review

This article explores the origins of the two competing theories of the Second Amendment -- the "individual rights" approach which carried the majority in Heller and McDonald, and the variants of a "collective right" theory which was previously dominant in the lower courts, and one variant of which was endorsed by the Heller dissents. Careful analysis of states' bills of rights of the Framing period suggests that two guarantees were desired, by different political factions. Framers closely adhering to the Classical Republican point of view favored protection for the militia as a system; those favoring the emerging Jeffersonian point of …

The Supreme Court's Controversial Gvrs - And An Alternative, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl

Michigan Law Review

This Article addresses a relatively neglected portion of the Supreme Court's docket: the "GVR"-that is, the Court's procedure for summarily granting certiorari, vacating the decision below without finding error, and remanding the case for further consideration by the lower court. The purpose of the GVR device is to give the lower court the initial opportunity to consider the possible impact of a new development (such as a recently issued Supreme Court decision) and, if necessary, to revise its ruling in light of the changed circumstances. The Court may issue scores or even hundreds of these orders every year. This Article …

Practice Makes Perfect? An Empirical Study Of Claim Construction Reversal Rates In Patent Cases, David L. Schwartz

Michigan Law Review

This Article examines whether U.S. district court judges improve their skills at patent claim construction with experience, including the experience of having their own cases reviewed by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In theory, higher courts teach doctrine to lower courts via judicial decisions, and lower courts learn from these decisions. This Article tests the teaching-and-learning premise on the issue of claim construction in the realities of patent litigation. While others have shown that the Federal Circuit reverses a large percentage of lower court claim constructions, no one has analyzed whether judges with more claim construction appeal …

Misshapen Districts, Mistaken Jurisprudence: The Supreme Court’S Decisions On Partisan Gerrymandering, Alfred J. Caniglia Iii

Saint Louis University Public Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Jurisprudence Of Judge Kenesaw Mountain Landis, Shayna M. Sigman

Marquette Sports Law Review

No abstract provided.

Original Jurisdiction Actions As A Remedy For Oklahoma's Decision Deficit, Bradley W. Welsh

Oklahoma Law Review

No abstract provided.

Supreme Court Federalism Decisions, Leon Friedman

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Filling In Some Pieces: The Supreme Court’S Criminal Law Decisions In The 1998-1999 Term, William E. Hellerstein

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

A Note To Our Readers, The Editors

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.