Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Institution
Articles 1 - 13 of 13
Full-Text Articles in Law
Rough Waters For The Ratings Companies: Should The Securities Ratings Companies Be Held Liable For Investor Reliance In The Wake Of The Real Estate Meltdown Of 2007-2008?, Kristofor W. Nelson
Rough Waters For The Ratings Companies: Should The Securities Ratings Companies Be Held Liable For Investor Reliance In The Wake Of The Real Estate Meltdown Of 2007-2008?, Kristofor W. Nelson
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Ratings Game: Explaining Rating Agency Failures In The Build Up To The Financial Crisis, Kia Dennis
The Ratings Game: Explaining Rating Agency Failures In The Build Up To The Financial Crisis, Kia Dennis
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Storetrax.Com, Inc. V. Gurland: An Unnecessarily Broad Rule That Could Adversely Affect A Corporation's Shareholders, Julie M. Dietrick
Storetrax.Com, Inc. V. Gurland: An Unnecessarily Broad Rule That Could Adversely Affect A Corporation's Shareholders, Julie M. Dietrick
Journal of Business & Technology Law
No abstract provided.
Estate Of Pew V. Cardarelli, Rachel Bell
Stoneridge Investment Partners, Llc V. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.: Views From The Academy, The Bar, And The Bench. Introduction
Journal of Business & Technology Law
No abstract provided.
The Future Of Securities Litigation, Richard A. Booth
The Future Of Securities Litigation, Richard A. Booth
Journal of Business & Technology Law
No abstract provided.
The Diminishing Role Of The Private Attorney General In Antitrust And Securities Class Action Cases Aided By The Supreme Court, Carl W. Hittinger, Jarod M. Bona
The Diminishing Role Of The Private Attorney General In Antitrust And Securities Class Action Cases Aided By The Supreme Court, Carl W. Hittinger, Jarod M. Bona
Journal of Business & Technology Law
No abstract provided.
Stoneridge Investment Partners, Llc V. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.: Substitution Of Congressional Intent With Caveat Emptor, Albert J. Matricciani Jr.
Stoneridge Investment Partners, Llc V. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.: Substitution Of Congressional Intent With Caveat Emptor, Albert J. Matricciani Jr.
Journal of Business & Technology Law
No abstract provided.
Proving Preemption By Proving Exemption: The Quandary Of The National Securities Market Improvement Act, Jeffrey D. Chadwick
Proving Preemption By Proving Exemption: The Quandary Of The National Securities Market Improvement Act, Jeffrey D. Chadwick
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Meet Two-Face: The Dualististic Rule 10b-5 And The Quandry Of Offsetting Losses By Gains, Samuel Francis
Meet Two-Face: The Dualististic Rule 10b-5 And The Quandry Of Offsetting Losses By Gains, Samuel Francis
Fordham Law Review
The challenge of calculating damages in securities litigation is often compounded by the phenomenon of investors that have accrued both gains and losses as a result of the defendant company’s same fraudulent misrepresentations. This Note traces the opposing damages approaches and accounting methods courts have adopted in these instances to the dual origins and objectives of the Rule 10b-5 private right of action. Underscoring the shortcomings in these damages calculations founded predominantly upon either deterrent or compensatory grounds, this Note instead strives for a measure that not only balances both imperative ends but also yields a more sensible and equitable …
Securities Class Actions, Cafa And A Countrywide Crisis: A Call For Clarity And Consistency, Denise Mazzeo
Securities Class Actions, Cafa And A Countrywide Crisis: A Call For Clarity And Consistency, Denise Mazzeo
Fordham Law Review
The unfolding of the credit crisis raises novel issues in securities litigation. This Note explores the conflict between the nonremoval provision of the Securities Act of 1933 (’33 Act) and the removal provisions of the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA), and their interplay in the context of class actions involving mortgage-backed securities. Circuits are currently split over whether or not such class actions are removable under CAFA. The Seventh Circuit and the Southern District of New York have held that class actions asserting only ’33 Act claims are removable under CAFA unless they fall within one of CAFA’s …
Securities Law And Antitrust Law: Two Legal Titans Clash Before The United States Supreme Court In Credit Suisse Securities V. Billing, Stacey Sheely Chubbuck
Securities Law And Antitrust Law: Two Legal Titans Clash Before The United States Supreme Court In Credit Suisse Securities V. Billing, Stacey Sheely Chubbuck
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Teamsters Local 445 Freight Division Pension Fund V. Dynex Capital Inc., Erica E. Bonnett
Teamsters Local 445 Freight Division Pension Fund V. Dynex Capital Inc., Erica E. Bonnett
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.