Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Defense and Security Studies (5)
- Other Psychology (5)
- Peace and Conflict Studies (5)
- Psychology (5)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (5)
-
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (5)
- Terrorism Studies (5)
- Criminal Law (3)
- Other Political Science (3)
- Political Science (3)
- International Law (2)
- Military, War, and Peace (2)
- Personality and Social Contexts (2)
- Communication (1)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- International Relations (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Law and Politics (1)
- Law and Psychology (1)
- Law and Race (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legal Studies (1)
- Legal Theory (1)
- Rule of Law (1)
- Social Influence and Political Communication (1)
- Institution
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Law
Profiling Profiling And Suicidal Terrorism, Ibpp Editor
Profiling Profiling And Suicidal Terrorism, Ibpp Editor
International Bulletin of Political Psychology
This article describes chronic flaws in developing profiles that are intended to help prevent or minimize suicidal terrorism.
Terrorism And Remorse: Psychology And The Death Penalty, Ibpp Editor
Terrorism And Remorse: Psychology And The Death Penalty, Ibpp Editor
International Bulletin of Political Psychology
This article provides commentary on the forensic psychological task to develop information bearing on penalties for convicted terrorists.
Personology, Profiling, And The Terrorist, Ibpp Editor
Personology, Profiling, And The Terrorist, Ibpp Editor
International Bulletin of Political Psychology
This article identifies problems in common approaches to capturing the psychological essence of the terrorist.
Trends. A Peculiar Defense Logic: Why Terrorists Should Be Incarcerated Or Killed Without Trial, Ibpp Editor
Trends. A Peculiar Defense Logic: Why Terrorists Should Be Incarcerated Or Killed Without Trial, Ibpp Editor
International Bulletin of Political Psychology
The IBPP editor discusses the logic/rationale behind the idea that convicted terrorists facing the death penalty should neither convicted nor face said penalty given that the soldiers are (or consider themselves to be) soldiers in a war.
Trends. Death Penalties For Purveyors Of Death? Not For Many Terrorists, Ibpp Editor
Trends. Death Penalties For Purveyors Of Death? Not For Many Terrorists, Ibpp Editor
International Bulletin of Political Psychology
This article discusses the nuances surrounding the use of the death penalty in terrorism cases.
Antiterrorism Military Commissions: Courting Illegality, Jordan J. Paust
Antiterrorism Military Commissions: Courting Illegality, Jordan J. Paust
Michigan Journal of International Law
On November 13, 2001, President Bush issued a sweeping and highly controversial Military Order for the purpose of creating military commissions with exclusive jurisdiction to try certain designated foreign nationals "for violations of the laws of war and other applicable laws" relevant to any prior or future "acts of international terrorism." The Order reaches far beyond the congressional authorization given the President "to use all necessary and appropriate force," including "use of the United States Armed Forces," against those involved in the September 11th attack "in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by …
Defining Terrorism As The Peace Time Equivalent Of War Crimes: A Case Of Too Much Convergence Between International Humanitarian Law And International Criminal Law?, Michael P. Scharf
Defining Terrorism As The Peace Time Equivalent Of War Crimes: A Case Of Too Much Convergence Between International Humanitarian Law And International Criminal Law?, Michael P. Scharf
ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law
The problem of defining "terrorism" has vexed the international community for years.
What Big Eyes And Ears You Have!: A New Regime For Covert Governmental Surveillance, Mark G. Young
What Big Eyes And Ears You Have!: A New Regime For Covert Governmental Surveillance, Mark G. Young
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.