Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Institution
Articles 1 - 23 of 23
Full-Text Articles in Law
Savino V. Commonwealth 239 Va. 534, 391 S.E.2d 276 (1990)
Savino V. Commonwealth 239 Va. 534, 391 S.E.2d 276 (1990)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Eaton V. Commonwealth No. 900238 (1990) (Lexis State Library, 125)
Eaton V. Commonwealth No. 900238 (1990) (Lexis State Library, 125)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Sawyer V. Smith 110 S. Ct. 2822, 111 L.Ed.2d 193 (1990)
Sawyer V. Smith 110 S. Ct. 2822, 111 L.Ed.2d 193 (1990)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Butler V. Mckellar 110 S. Ct. 1212, 108 L.Ed.2d 347 (1990)
Butler V. Mckellar 110 S. Ct. 1212, 108 L.Ed.2d 347 (1990)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Introduction, William S. Geimer
Lewis V. Jeffers 110 S. Ct. 3092, 111 L.Ed.2d 606 (1990)
Lewis V. Jeffers 110 S. Ct. 3092, 111 L.Ed.2d 606 (1990)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Justus V. Murray 897 F.2d 709 (1990)
Cheng V. Commonwealth 240 Va. 26,393 S.E.2d 599 (1990)
Cheng V. Commonwealth 240 Va. 26,393 S.E.2d 599 (1990)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
State Habeas In Virginia: A Critical Transition, Catherine M. Hobart
State Habeas In Virginia: A Critical Transition, Catherine M. Hobart
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Perfecting The Record Of A Capital Case In Virginia, Robert L. Powley
Perfecting The Record Of A Capital Case In Virginia, Robert L. Powley
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel, Thomas J. Marlowe
Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel, Thomas J. Marlowe
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Critical Points In The Progress Of A Capital Case, Elizabeth A. Bennett
Critical Points In The Progress Of A Capital Case, Elizabeth A. Bennett
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Capital Pretrial Motions: Added Dimensions, Thomas W. Plimpton, Kerry D. Lee
Capital Pretrial Motions: Added Dimensions, Thomas W. Plimpton, Kerry D. Lee
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Introduction, William S. Geimer
Coleman V. Thompson F.2d _ (4th Cir. 1990)
Coleman V. Thompson F.2d _ (4th Cir. 1990)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Spencer V. Commonwealth [Spencer Iii] Va.., 385 S.E.2d 850 (1989) Supreme Court Of Virginia
Spencer V. Commonwealth [Spencer Iii] Va.., 385 S.E.2d 850 (1989) Supreme Court Of Virginia
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Robbery, Rape And Abduction: Alone And As Predicate Offenses To Capital Murder, Cary P. Mosely, Carolyn M. Richardson
Robbery, Rape And Abduction: Alone And As Predicate Offenses To Capital Murder, Cary P. Mosely, Carolyn M. Richardson
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Where Do We Go From Here? - Post-Conviction Review Of Death Sentences, Juliette A. Falkner
Where Do We Go From Here? - Post-Conviction Review Of Death Sentences, Juliette A. Falkner
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Death By Lottery--Procedural Bar Of Constitutional Claims In Capital Cases Due To Inadequate Representation Of Indigent Defendants, Stephen B. Bright
Death By Lottery--Procedural Bar Of Constitutional Claims In Capital Cases Due To Inadequate Representation Of Indigent Defendants, Stephen B. Bright
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Human Rights V. Extradition: The Soering Case, Stephan Breitenmoser, Gunter E. Wilms
Human Rights V. Extradition: The Soering Case, Stephan Breitenmoser, Gunter E. Wilms
Michigan Journal of International Law
The European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms is widely regarded as the most dynamic and effective of the various international human rights instruments. Its impact on the judiciary of the twenty-three Western European Member States, as well as its pace-setting role for other international mechanisms for the protection of human rights, has recently been confirmed by the unanimous judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in Soering v. United Kingdom. In its judgment delivered on July 7, 1989, the Court held that the United Kingdom would act in violation of article 3 of …
Note, The Death Penalty In Late Imperial, Modern, And Post-Tiananmen China, Alan W. Lepp
Note, The Death Penalty In Late Imperial, Modern, And Post-Tiananmen China, Alan W. Lepp
Michigan Journal of International Law
This paper seeks to explore the crucial determinants that shape the Chinese legal system's use of the death penalty. Why have the Chinese relied so heavily on execution as a form of sentencing? What factors and conditions account for the major changes in the frequency of China's use of the death penalty? What indigenous traditions are reflected in China's implementation of the death penalty? In order to inquire into the role and function of the legal system in affecting the severity of criminal punishment in China, this study will focus on only those death sentences carried out by the state …
Children, The Death Penalty And The Eighth Amendment: An Analysis Of Stanford V. Kentucky, Tanya M. Perfecky
Children, The Death Penalty And The Eighth Amendment: An Analysis Of Stanford V. Kentucky, Tanya M. Perfecky
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Lucas Court And Capital Punishment: The Orginial Understanding Of The Special Circumstances, John W. Paulos
The Lucas Court And Capital Punishment: The Orginial Understanding Of The Special Circumstances, John W. Paulos
Santa Clara Law Review
No abstract provided.