Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

PDF

Missouri Law Review

2015

Administrative

Articles 1 - 5 of 5

Full-Text Articles in Law

Exploring The Administrative State, Erin Morrow Hawley Nov 2015

Exploring The Administrative State, Erin Morrow Hawley

Missouri Law Review

The administrative state today “wields vast power and touches almost every aspect of daily life.” There’s no question that the Founders would have been surprised by the current administrative state. By and large, however, both the academy and Article III judges are either reluctant or enthusiastic devotees of the administrative state. A variety of arguments have been put forward to situate the Fourth Branch within the constitutional fabric, from constitutional moments, to the Supreme Court’s pragmatic recognition that, given government as we know it, “Congress simply cannot do its job absent an ability to delegate power under broad general directives.” …


Early Prerogative And Administrative Power: A Response To Paul Craig, Philip Hamburger Nov 2015

Early Prerogative And Administrative Power: A Response To Paul Craig, Philip Hamburger

Missouri Law Review

This Article is organized around Craig’s three criticisms. (I) In challenging my thesis that federal administrative power revives a version of prerogative power, he argues that these types of power are crucially different because the prerogative was independent of statute. But his statute-free vision of prerogative power is grossly incorrect, and it therefore cannot distinguish prerogative and administrative power. His argument also is unresponsive. My thesis is that administrative power revives the extralegal character of the absolute prerogative – in other words, that both sorts of power have bound subjects through extralegal edicts – and this extralegal power remains a …


Restoring Chevron’S Domain, Jonathan H. Adler Nov 2015

Restoring Chevron’S Domain, Jonathan H. Adler

Missouri Law Review

This brief Article’s aim is not so ambitious as to praise or bury Chevron. It seeks only to make a more modest point about the Chevron doctrine and its domain.12 On the assumption that Chevron, in some form, will remain a significant part of the constellation of administrative law, this Article suggests Chevron’s domain should be defined and delimited by its doctrinal grounding. Put another way, the legal rationale for providing deference to agency interpretations of ambiguous statutory text should determine the doctrine’s scope and application. More precisely, insofar as the Court’s subsequent application and elucidation of Chevron have indicated …


Why Bias Challenges To Administrative Adjudication Should Succeed, Kent Barnett Nov 2015

Why Bias Challenges To Administrative Adjudication Should Succeed, Kent Barnett

Missouri Law Review

Administrative adjudication’s partiality problem is a worthy candidate to join these claims for three reasons. First, prohibiting administrative adjudicators’ partiality, unlike some other structural areas, does not require overruling prior decisions and relies heavily on the Court’s recent precedent. Second, partiality challenges fit comfortably within the Court’s penchant for formalism and prophylaxes in structural constitutional matters. Indeed, formalism is much more justified for partiality challenges than certain other structural issues and has a longer jurisprudential provenance. Finally, as compared to other proposed challenges to the administrative state, challenges based on administrative partiality are more likely to earn enough votes to …


“The People Surrender Nothing”: Social Compact Theory, Republicanism, And The Modern Administrative State, Joseph Postell Nov 2015

“The People Surrender Nothing”: Social Compact Theory, Republicanism, And The Modern Administrative State, Joseph Postell

Missouri Law Review

The Article’s argument proceeds in four parts. Part I provides an overview of the scholarly arguments in defense of the nondelegation doctrine. It describes three arguments in favor of the nondelegation doctrine: the separation of powers, political accountability, and constitutional text. Part II argues that social compact theory – not separation of powers, accountability, or constitutional text – is the true foundation of the nondelegation principle. Part III connects the theory of the social compact to the basic principles of republican government, which require that legislative powers are exercised by the representatives of the people chosen through elections. Part IV …