Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
No Warrant For Radical Change: A Response To Professors George And Guthrie, Erwin Chemerinsky
No Warrant For Radical Change: A Response To Professors George And Guthrie, Erwin Chemerinsky
Duke Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Measuring Judges And Justice, Jeffrey M. Chemerinsky, Jonathan L. Williams
Measuring Judges And Justice, Jeffrey M. Chemerinsky, Jonathan L. Williams
Duke Law Journal
No abstract provided.
A Response To Professors George And Guthrie, Remaking The United States Supreme Court In The Courts’ Of Appeals Image, Michael Boudin
A Response To Professors George And Guthrie, Remaking The United States Supreme Court In The Courts’ Of Appeals Image, Michael Boudin
Duke Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Remaking The United States Supreme Court In The Courts’ Of Appeals Image, Tracey E. George, Chris Guthrie
Remaking The United States Supreme Court In The Courts’ Of Appeals Image, Tracey E. George, Chris Guthrie
Duke Law Journal
We argue that Congress should remake the United States Supreme Court in the U.S. courts' of appeals image by increasing the size of the Court's membership, authorizing panel decisionmaking, and retaining an en banc procedure for select cases. In so doing, Congress would expand the Court's capacity to decide cases, facilitating enhanced clarity and consistency in the law as well as heightened monitoring of lower courts and the other branches. Remaking the Court in this way would not only expand the Court's decisionmaking capacity but also improve the Court's composition, competence, and functioning.