Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 30 of 40

Full-Text Articles in Law

Menstrual Equity In Schools: Existing State Laws, Marcy L. Karin, Galina M. Abdel Aziz Dec 2020

Menstrual Equity In Schools: Existing State Laws, Marcy L. Karin, Galina M. Abdel Aziz

D.C. Council Testimony

This chart supplements our November 24, 2020 testimony in support of B23-0887, the “Expanding Student Access to Period Products Act of 2020.” It compares existing state laws that provide access to free menstrual products in schools.


Testimony In Support Of B23-0887, The "Expanding Student Access To Period Products Act Of 2020" Before The Committee Of The Whole And The Committee On Education, Marcy L. Karin, Galina M. Abdel Aziz Nov 2020

Testimony In Support Of B23-0887, The "Expanding Student Access To Period Products Act Of 2020" Before The Committee Of The Whole And The Committee On Education, Marcy L. Karin, Galina M. Abdel Aziz

D.C. Council Testimony

No abstract provided.


Echoes Of 9/11: Rhetorical Analysis Of Presidential Statements In The "War On Terror", Bruce Ching Nov 2020

Echoes Of 9/11: Rhetorical Analysis Of Presidential Statements In The "War On Terror", Bruce Ching

Journal Articles

This article examines persuasive statements by Presidents George W. Bush, Barack Obama, and Donald Trump involving appeals to national identity as a rhetorical foundation for anti-terrorism policy since 9/11. Their specific rhetorical methods have included the use of memorable catchphrases, alliteration, metaphorical framing, and contrast between values of the United States and those of the terrorists. President Bush focused on rallying the nation’s response against the perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks, identifying the U.S. with “freedom itself” and invoking the phrase “War on Terror.” President Obama emphasized the importance of the nation’s values while denouncing the Bush administration’s torture of …


Letter To South Dakota Board Of Bar Examiners, Legislation/Civil Rights Clinic Jul 2020

Letter To South Dakota Board Of Bar Examiners, Legislation/Civil Rights Clinic

Menstrual Policies and the Bar

No abstract provided.


Letter To Texas Board Of Law Examiners, Legislation/Civil Rights Clinic Jul 2020

Letter To Texas Board Of Law Examiners, Legislation/Civil Rights Clinic

Menstrual Policies and the Bar

No abstract provided.


Letter To Kansas Board Of Law Examiners, Legislation/Civil Rights Clinic Jul 2020

Letter To Kansas Board Of Law Examiners, Legislation/Civil Rights Clinic

Menstrual Policies and the Bar

No abstract provided.


Letter To Nebraska State Bar Commission, Legislation/Civil Rights Clinic Jul 2020

Letter To Nebraska State Bar Commission, Legislation/Civil Rights Clinic

Menstrual Policies and the Bar

No abstract provided.


Letter To State Board Of Law Examiners North Dakota, Legislation/Civil Rights Clinic Jul 2020

Letter To State Board Of Law Examiners North Dakota, Legislation/Civil Rights Clinic

Menstrual Policies and the Bar

No abstract provided.


Letter To The Office Of The Board Of Bar Examiners Oregon, Legislation/Civil Rights Clinic Jul 2020

Letter To The Office Of The Board Of Bar Examiners Oregon, Legislation/Civil Rights Clinic

Menstrual Policies and the Bar

No abstract provided.


Letter To Oklahoma Board Of Bar Examiners, Legislation/Civil Rights Clinic Jul 2020

Letter To Oklahoma Board Of Bar Examiners, Legislation/Civil Rights Clinic

Menstrual Policies and the Bar

No abstract provided.


Letter To Associate Director Of The Idaho State Bar Exam, Idaho State Bar, Legislation/Civil Rights Clinic Jul 2020

Letter To Associate Director Of The Idaho State Bar Exam, Idaho State Bar, Legislation/Civil Rights Clinic

Menstrual Policies and the Bar

No abstract provided.


Letter To Alabama State Bar, Legislation/Civil Rights Clinic Jul 2020

Letter To Alabama State Bar, Legislation/Civil Rights Clinic

Menstrual Policies and the Bar

No abstract provided.


Letter To Office Of Bar Admissions Supreme Court Of South Carolina, Legislation/Civil Rights Clinic Jul 2020

Letter To Office Of Bar Admissions Supreme Court Of South Carolina, Legislation/Civil Rights Clinic

Menstrual Policies and the Bar

No abstract provided.


Letter To Wyoming State Bar, Legislation/Civil Rights Clinic Jul 2020

Letter To Wyoming State Bar, Legislation/Civil Rights Clinic

Menstrual Policies and the Bar

No abstract provided.


Letter To Executive Director Office Of Professional Programs Arkansas, Legislation/Civil Rights Clinic Jul 2020

Letter To Executive Director Office Of Professional Programs Arkansas, Legislation/Civil Rights Clinic

Menstrual Policies and the Bar

No abstract provided.


Letter To State Bar Of Nevada, Legislation/Civil Rights Clinic Jul 2020

Letter To State Bar Of Nevada, Legislation/Civil Rights Clinic

Menstrual Policies and the Bar

No abstract provided.


Letter To Department Of Admissions/Exam State Bar Of Montana, Legislation/Civil Rights Clinic Jul 2020

Letter To Department Of Admissions/Exam State Bar Of Montana, Legislation/Civil Rights Clinic

Menstrual Policies and the Bar

No abstract provided.


Letter To Supreme Court Of Wisconsin Board Of Bar Examiners, Legislation/Civil Rights Clinic Jul 2020

Letter To Supreme Court Of Wisconsin Board Of Bar Examiners, Legislation/Civil Rights Clinic

Menstrual Policies and the Bar

No abstract provided.


Letter To Washington State Bar Association, Legislation/Civil Rights Clinic Jul 2020

Letter To Washington State Bar Association, Legislation/Civil Rights Clinic

Menstrual Policies and the Bar

No abstract provided.


Letter To Mississippi Board Of Bar Admissions, Legislation/Civil Rights Clinic Jul 2020

Letter To Mississippi Board Of Bar Admissions, Legislation/Civil Rights Clinic

Menstrual Policies and the Bar

No abstract provided.


Letter To The West Virginia Board Of Law Examiners, Legislation/Civil Rights Clinic Jul 2020

Letter To The West Virginia Board Of Law Examiners, Legislation/Civil Rights Clinic

Menstrual Policies and the Bar

No abstract provided.


Remarks: "When They Go Low, We Go Local" Strategies For Pursuing Dc Democracy In The Age Of Trump, Jon S. Bouker Esq. May 2020

Remarks: "When They Go Low, We Go Local" Strategies For Pursuing Dc Democracy In The Age Of Trump, Jon S. Bouker Esq.

University of the District of Columbia Law Review

Remarks of Jon S. Bouker, Esq., Chair, DC Appleseed Center for Law and Justice, at the University of the District of Columbia, David A. Clarke School of Law, Law Review Symposium, DC Democracy During the Time of Trump: 51 and 45.


2017 Keynote Speech: Dc Democracy During The Time Of Trump: 51 And 45!, Wade Henderson May 2020

2017 Keynote Speech: Dc Democracy During The Time Of Trump: 51 And 45!, Wade Henderson

University of the District of Columbia Law Review

Keynote speech of Wade Henderson at the University of the District of Columbia, David A. Clarke School of Law, Law Review Symposium, DC Democracy During the Time of Trump: 51 and 45.


Laboratory Of Democracy: How The District Of Columbia Is Using The Home Rule Act To Achieve Elements Of Statehood, Walter A. Smith Jr., Kevin M. Hilgers May 2020

Laboratory Of Democracy: How The District Of Columbia Is Using The Home Rule Act To Achieve Elements Of Statehood, Walter A. Smith Jr., Kevin M. Hilgers

University of the District of Columbia Law Review

On January 3, 2019, Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton, the District of Columbia's (the "District') nonvoting delegate to the House of Representatives, reintroduced the Washington, D.C. Admission Act, which would make much of the District the 51st state. While Norton had made a tradition of opening each new Congress by introducing D.C. democracy bills, the context this time gave District advocates more reason to be optimistic. With the Democrats gaining control of the House, the bill gained a record 155 original cosponsors, and Representative Elijah Cummings, chair of the House Committee on Oversight and Reform, committed to holding a hearing on …


Sanctuary Cities? Asylum? Dreamers? When A House Is Not A Home: The Legal And Socioeconomic Implications Of National Populism On Local Governance And Individual Liberties, Rawle Andrews Jr., Sanchita Bose May 2020

Sanctuary Cities? Asylum? Dreamers? When A House Is Not A Home: The Legal And Socioeconomic Implications Of National Populism On Local Governance And Individual Liberties, Rawle Andrews Jr., Sanchita Bose

University of the District of Columbia Law Review

Since the 1950s, the U.S. has proudly boasted itself as "a nation of immigrants," However, immigration reform is amongst the most intensely confusing, divisive, and polarizing issues in America's public square. Immigration remains front and center in the public debate across the U.S., especially since the September 11th terrorist attacks. The fear and turmoil, which ebbed and flowed since the 9/11 tragedy, reached a boiling point during the 2016 general election cycle, and ultimately the election of the 45th president, Donald J. Trump. This article examines the impact and implications of a broken federal government on America's cities which are …


A Review Of The D.C. League Of Women Voters Project To Educate Sister Leagues Around The Country, Anne Anderson, Linda Beebe May 2020

A Review Of The D.C. League Of Women Voters Project To Educate Sister Leagues Around The Country, Anne Anderson, Linda Beebe

University of the District of Columbia Law Review

The League of Women Voters of the District of Columbia ("LWVDC"), a chapter of the League of Women Voters of the United States ("LWVUS" or the "League"), has long been a staunch supporter of equality for the District of Columbia ("D.C." or the "District") by advocating for voting rights in Congress, promoting local control of local affairs, and supporting a Constitutional amendment when it was proposed. Statehood for the People of D.C., as it is currently constructed, is a newer idea that has been shrouded in much confusion and misunderstanding for people in other parts of the country. In 2015, …


A Proposal To Win The District Of Columbia A Partial Vote In The House Of Representatives, Mary M. Cheh May 2020

A Proposal To Win The District Of Columbia A Partial Vote In The House Of Representatives, Mary M. Cheh

University of the District of Columbia Law Review

Unlike many citizens of the United States, citizens of the District of Columbia are denied a vote in the national legislature. Not only are they denied a voting representative on matters of national scope and importance, but Congress may control all facets of local governance for the 700,000 residents of the District. This paper suggests a new initiative. It calls for the D.C. Council, under its "Home Rule" authority granted by Congress, to amend a federal law, "The District of Columbia Delegate Act," ("Delgate Act") and give the District's delegate to the House of Representatives the authority to vote in …


John Fitisemanu, Et. Al. V. United States Of America, Et. Al., And The American Samoa Government And The Hon. Aumua Amata, Rafael Cox Alomar May 2020

John Fitisemanu, Et. Al. V. United States Of America, Et. Al., And The American Samoa Government And The Hon. Aumua Amata, Rafael Cox Alomar

Court Briefs

No abstract provided.


Table Of Contents, University Of The District Of Columbia Law Review Mar 2020

Table Of Contents, University Of The District Of Columbia Law Review

University of the District of Columbia Law Review

No abstract provided.


What Can The Protection And Advocacy Network Offer To Our Veterans?, David A. Boyer Mar 2020

What Can The Protection And Advocacy Network Offer To Our Veterans?, David A. Boyer

University of the District of Columbia Law Review

The desire to compensate veterans predates the establishment of the United States (“U.S.”). In 1636, individuals with disabilities received pensions for defending the Plymouth colony against Native Americans.1 Throughout history, this practice continued, as documented by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”).2 By 1930, President Herbert Hoover signed the Executive Order 5398, which created the Veterans Administration.3 Prior to President Hoover’s signing of that executive order, the available veteran services were divided by three separate governmental agencies: the Veterans’ Bureau, the Pensions Bureau, and the Soldiers’ Home.4 Consequently, that executive order combined all three agencies into one that concentrated …