Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Law

Texaco, Inc. V. Short (U.S. Supreme Court): An Analysis Of The Proposed Dormant Mineral Legislation For Arkansas, Phillip E. Norvell Feb 1983

Texaco, Inc. V. Short (U.S. Supreme Court): An Analysis Of The Proposed Dormant Mineral Legislation For Arkansas, Phillip E. Norvell

Annual of the Arkansas Natural Resources Law Institute

No abstract provided.


The Citizen's Relief Against Inactive Federal Officials: Case Studies In Mandamus, Actions "In The Nature Of Mandamus," And Mandamus Injunctions, Howard Brill Jan 1983

The Citizen's Relief Against Inactive Federal Officials: Case Studies In Mandamus, Actions "In The Nature Of Mandamus," And Mandamus Injunctions, Howard Brill

School of Law Faculty Publications and Presentations

In response to citizen pressure and perceived need legislative bodies have enacted statutes prescribing specific legislative standards designed to protect the public. The scope of these statutes has required a corresponding growth of the administrative process. For instance, statutes enacted by Congress in the past few decades include provisions mandating that the Department of Education (hereinafter DOE) deny federal funds to schools that fail to desegregate in accordance with constitutional standards. When the legislature has spoken the citizen expects a certain result; yet, the DOE may continue to provide funds to these schools. However, in all likelihood this failure to …


The Election Of Remedies Doctrine In Arkansas, Howard Brill Jan 1983

The Election Of Remedies Doctrine In Arkansas, Howard Brill

School of Law Faculty Publications and Presentations

The doctrine of election of remedies provides that if a party has two or more inconsistent remedies for a single cause of action, or arising from a single transaction, only one remedy may be ultimately pursued and only one remedy satisfied. The classic, and perhaps most frequent, illustration of the doctrine is presented in contract cases in which the plaintiff alleges that he was fraudulently induced to enter into the transaction. The buyer of the property must choose whether to keep the goods and sue for damages for fraud, thus affirming the contract, or to rescind the contract for fraud …