Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Civil Law (2)
- American Popular Culture (1)
- American Studies (1)
- Arts and Humanities (1)
- Business Organizations Law (1)
-
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Disability Law (1)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Gender and Sexuality (1)
- Labor and Employment Law (1)
- Law and Gender (1)
- Legal Education (1)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (1)
- Race and Ethnicity (1)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (1)
- Sociology (1)
- Workers' Compensation Law (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Expanding The Civil Rights Dialogue In An Increasingly Diverse America: A Review Of Frank Wu’S Yellow: Race In America Beyond Black And White, Harvey Gee
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Discrimination Cases Of The 2002 Term, Eileen Kaufman
Discrimination Cases Of The 2002 Term, Eileen Kaufman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Dan Subotnik, Toxic Diversity: Race, Gender, And Law Talk In America, Hannah Abrams
Dan Subotnik, Toxic Diversity: Race, Gender, And Law Talk In America, Hannah Abrams
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Race Indeed Above All: A Reply To Professors Andrea Curcio, Carol Chomsky, And Eileen Kaufman, Dan Subotnik
Race Indeed Above All: A Reply To Professors Andrea Curcio, Carol Chomsky, And Eileen Kaufman, Dan Subotnik
Scholarly Works
This article was written as part of an ongoing dialog about the author’s previous article, Does Testing = Race Discrimination?: Ricci, The Bar Exam, the LSAT, and the Challenge to Learning, which defended the Supreme Court’s decision in Ricci v. DeStefano, as well as defending testing more generally against charges of irrelevance, racial obtuseness, and most seriously, race discrimination.
This article specifically responds to Andrea A. Curcio, Carol L. Chomsky, and Eileen Kaufman’s article, Testing, Diversity, and Merit: A Reply to Dan Subotnik and Others.