Law Commons^™

Big-Box Bullies Bust Benign Buyer Behavior: Wal-Mart, Get Your Hand Off My Receipt!, Victoria S. Salzmann

Victoria S. Salzmann

This Article is a critical analysis of “big-box” store policies that force consumers to hand over their receipts before they are permitted to leave. I argue that, at least in the tort context, the economic power of retail stores has grown beyond the limiting power of the law. To support this theory, I consider a practice I show to be unlawful under settled tort law—store demands for customer receipts. Considering this illegal practice against other unchecked illegalities performed by the superstores, I theorize that economic power is replacing the law as the personal liberty safeguard.

An Inconvenient Truth: Recognizing Andrea Yates Was A Victim Of Spousal Abuse: She Killed Her Children To Save Her Life, Shelby A.D. Moore

Shelby A.D. Moore

The definition of domestic violence is broad and includes physical as well as psychological and sexual abuse. However, the legal system gives considerably less attention to these latter forms of abuse. One reason for the relative neglect in the area is the assumption that physical abuse causes more harm than do psychological and sexual abuse. In reality these forms of abuse may have a far greater impact on their victims. Apart from physical abuse, greater attention must be given to those who suffer on-going psychological and sexual abuse at the hand of a spouse or intimate partner. We must consider …

Into The Twilight Zone: Informing Judicial Discretion In Federal Sentencing, Mary K. Ramirez

mary k ramirez

Into the Twilight Zone: Informing Judicial Discretion in Federal Sentencing

Recent changes in federal sentencing have shifted discretionary decision-making back to federal district court judges, while appellate courts review challenged sentences for reasonableness. Each judge brings considerable legal experience and qualifications to the bench, however, cultural experiences cannot necessarily prepare judges for the range of persons or situations they will address on the bench. Social psychologists who have studied social cognition have determined that the human brain creates categories and associations resulting in implicit biases and associations that are often unconscious or subconscious. Moreover, research suggests that such biases may …

Into The Twilight Zone: Informing Judicial Discretion In Federal Sentencing, Mary K. Ramirez

mary k ramirez

Into the Twilight Zone: Informing Judicial Discretion in Federal Sentencing

Recent changes in federal sentencing have shifted discretionary decision-making back to federal district court judges, while appellate courts review challenged sentences for reasonableness. Each judge brings considerable legal experience and qualifications to the bench, however, cultural experiences cannot necessarily prepare judges for the range of persons or situations they will address on the bench. Social psychologists who have studied social cognition have determined that the human brain creates categories and associations resulting in implicit biases and associations that are often unconscious or subconscious. Moreover, research suggests that such biases may …

Predicting Law School Success: A Study Of Goal Orientations, Academic Achievement And The Declining Self-Efficacy Of Our Law Students, Leah M. Christensen

Leah M Christensen

This study asked 157 law students to respond to a survey about their learning goals and motivations for learning in law school. The student responses were correlated to different academic variables, including class rank, LSAT scores, undergraduate GPA. Further, the study explored whether any relationships existed between goal orientations (mastery or performance) and law school success (class rank). The results were illuminating: despite the performance-based curriculum of law school, the most successful students were mastery oriented learners. In contrast, there was no statistical correlation between performance-oriented learning and law school success. Further, the LSAT score was the weakest predictor of …

The Kidney Donor Scholarship Act: How College Scholarships Can Provide Financial Incentives For Kidney Donation While Preserving Altruistic Meaning, Jake Linford

Jake Linford

In the United States, lives are lost on a daily basis due to a significant shortfall in the availability of kidneys for transplantation. The current debate over possible solutions has primarily taken place at two theoretical poles—open markets and pure altruism. This article provides a timely and original response, bridging the gulf between the poles by proposing an educational scholarship to encourage kidney donation, and presenting data which indicates that the scholarship incentive may well increase the availability of transplantable kidneys in a way that preserves altruistic donation and mitigates potentially coercive market pressures. In making this case, this article …

State Actors Beating Children: A Call For Judicial Relief, Deana Ann Pollard Sacks

Deana A Pollard

Controversy over public school corporal punishment is at an all-time high. On August 20, 2008, the Human Rights Watch/ACLU brought public attention to the issue by releasing its report on corporal punishment of children in American public schools. Lawsuits challenging this state action on constitutional grounds continue to be filed, as advocates seeking to ban school paddling refuse to accept that beating students is constitutionally permissible, despite their repeated losses in the federal courts, and the Supreme Court’s refusal to consider the issue again on June 23, 2008. Ignoring the uproar, nearly half of the United States continue to employ …

Exposing The Myth Of Homo Economicus, Ronald J. Colombo

Ronald J Colombo

The prevalence of the "homo economicus" model of humanity has crowded out considerations of important noneconomic aspects of human nature - most importantly, the moral dimension of human thought and conduct. As a result, our understanding of the present ills besetting the business world and the market economy is incomplete, and the policy prescriptions flowing therefrom are often suboptimal (if not counterproductive).

This book review situates "Moral Markets" within this larger debate over human nature generally. I show how, through the presentation of biological evidence and evolutionary theory, "Moral Markets" repudiates the "homo economicus" model of humankind, and supports the …

Preparing Law Students For Disappointing Exam Results: Lessons From "Casey At The Bat", Grant H. Morris

Grant H Morris

It is a statistical fact of life that two-thirds of the law students who enter law school will not graduate in the upper one-third of their law school class. Typically, those students are disappointed in their examination grade results and in their class standing. Nowhere does this disappointment manifest itself more than in their attitude toward their classes. As students begin law school, they are eager, excited, and willing to participate in class discussion. But after they receive their first semester grade results, many students withdraw from the learning process; they are depressed and disengaged. They suffer a significant loss …

Methinks The Lady Doth Protest Too Little: Reassessing The Probative Value Of Silence, Mikah K. Story Thompson

Mikah K. Story Thompson

This article takes a fresh look at why individuals remain silent in the face of accusations by law enforcement. Traditionally, many courts have found that a defendant’s failure to protest her innocence reflects one of three things: (1) that the defendant has manifested her assent to the accusation by not responding; (2) that the defendant’s silence is a prior statement inconsistent with any testimony proclaiming innocence at trial; or (3) that the silence is substantive evidence of the defendant’s guilt. This article posits that a defendant’s silence actually means very little. Social science research regarding the possible meanings of silence …

The Place Of Storytelling In Legal Reasoning: Abraham Joshua Heschel’S Torah Min Hashamayim, Stefan H. Krieger

Stefan H Krieger

This article reads the teachings of two rabbis from the Second Century through the lenses of cognitive science on legal thinking and shows the relationship of their narratives and legal opinions. Cognitive scientists posit that both logical and narrative thinking are essential modes of cognitive functioning. The stories and legal decisions of Rabbi Akiva and Rabbi Ishmael, as described by Abraham Joshua Heschel in his masterpiece, Torah Min Hashamayim (Heavenly Torah) support these insights. Both rabbis lived in a critical period in Jewish history. The Temple, the central focus of the people’s connection with God, had been destroyed; large numbers …

When It's So Hard To Relate: Can Legal Systems Mitigate The Trauma Of Victim-Offender Relationships?, Jody L. Madeira

Jody L Madeira

This article argues that, in the aftermath of violent crime, a relationship that is both negative and involuntary can form between crime victims and offenders. This relationship fetters the victim to the crime and the criminal, rendering it difficult to recover from the transgression. To illustrate how such a relationship may form and what consequences it may have for victims, this article uses the Oklahoma City bombing as a case study, documenting through the use of original interviews an involuntary relationship in which victims’ family members and survivors perceived they were tethered to Timothy McVeigh. This perceived relationship with McVeigh …

"Nigger": A Critical Race Realist Analysis Of The N-Word Within Hate Crimes Law, Shayne E. Jones, Gregory S. Parks

Shayne E Jones

On a 2005 summer morning, Nicholas “Fat Nick” Minucci (White) beat Glenn Moore (Black) with a baseball bat and robbed him. During the assault, Minucci repeatedly screamed the N-word. At trial, Minucci’s attorney argued that he had not committed a hate crime. The essence of the defense’s argument was that Minucci’s use of the N-word while assaulting and robbing Moore was not indicative of any bias or prejudice. The defense went on to indicate that Minucci had Black friends, was immersed in Black culture, and employed the N-word as part of his everyday vocabulary. Two Black men—Gary Jenkins (hip hop …

Spiritualism And Will(S) In The Age Of Contract, Christopher J. Buccafusco

Christopher J. Buccafusco

Spiritualism was one of the most salient cultural phenomena of late-nineteenth-century American life. The belief of considerable numbers of respectable citizens that they could communicate with the dead via an entranced medium called into question both popular and scientific conceptions of rationality, volition, and freedom. In turn, these changing ideas about the mind challenged American law’s commitment to its belief in free and reasonable legal actors. This Article, the first to consider Spiritualism’s implications for American law, examines the legal reaction to the anxieties Spiritualism generated for the age of contract. Principally, it looks at the judicial response to cases …

Hedonic Adaptation And The Settlement Of Civil Lawsuits, Jonathan S. Masur, John Bronsteen, Christopher Buccafusco

Jonathan S. Masur

This paper examines the burgeoning psychological literature on happiness and hedonic adaptation (a person’s capacity to preserve or recapture her level of happiness by adjusting to changed circumstances), bringing this literature to bear on a previously overlooked aspect of the civil litigation process: the probability of pre-trial settlement. The glacial pace of civil litigation is commonly thought of as a regrettable source of costs to the relevant parties. Even relatively straightforward personal injury lawsuits can last for as long as two years, delaying the arrival of necessary redress to the tort victim and forcing the litigants to expend ever greater …

Neither Saints Nor Devils: A Behavioral Analysis Of Attorneys' Contingent Fees, Eyal Zamir, Ilana Ritov

Eyal Zamir

The market for legal services, and particularly lawyers’ Contingent Fee (CF) arrangements, have been extensively studied from legal, economic and sociological standpoints, but curiously not from a behavioral perspective. Building on Kahneman and Tversky’s Prospect Theory, this paper presents a series of experiments designed to reveal people’s preferences regarding attorneys’ fees and their perceived fairness.

Contrary to common economic wisdom, we demonstrate that loss aversion (rather than risk aversion or incentivizing the lawyer to win the case) plays a major role in clients’ preferences for CF. Facing a choice between a mixed “gamble” and a pure positive one, plaintiffs prefer …

Law And Biology, Morris B. Hoffman

Morris B. Hoffman

Survey of the impacts of emerging evolutionary and neuroscientific insights into the foundations of law.

Is Today The Day We Free Electroconvulsive Therapy?, Mike Jorgensen

Mike Jorgensen

ABSTRACT IS TODAY THE DAY WE FREE ELECTROCONVULSIVE THERAPY? By Mike E Jorgensen Electroconvulsive Therapy, or “ECT,” has become increasingly more popular to treat certain mental illnesses, especially severe depression and pseudo dementia. The stigma it suffered due to prior barbaric type applications in the past are largely historic, and most medical professionals will agree that ECT is safe today, has very minimal side effects, not inherently abusive, and no long- term detriments. Yet, with the increase in popularity and the safe applications, ECT is still treated archaically under the law and the legislative restraints are causing an indigent, elderly …

Hyperbole And The Laws Of Evidence: Why Chicken Is Generally Wrong, A Ten Year Retrospective On Fre 413-415, Thomas A. Vogele

Thomas A Vogele

The Federal Rules of Evidence 413 through 415 were hailed by their proponents as a critical tool in combating the scourge of rape and child sexual assault. The new rules' critics claimed that passage of such radical changes would be the death knell for due process, civil liberties, and the presumption of innocence.

As with so many hotly debated issues in our hyper-polarized society, the truth lay somewhere in between. This paper examines the rules, the hype in favor and against them, the objective statistics, and why the passage of the new rules was not so much a radical departure …

Analysis Of Indiana V. Edwards (2008), Andrew S. Mansfield

Andrew S Mansfield

The reasoning of the Supreme Court in Indiana v. Edwards, holding that a State could force a defendant to proceed to trial with appointed counsel instead of allowing him to represent himself, is reviewed. The holding centers on the mental capacity of the individual waiving counsel. A review of the amicus curiae brief filed by the APA in Indiana v. Edwards indicates that the brief had a significant impact on the decision. The arguments concerning Godinez and the non-unitary nature of mental competency in the decision largely track the arguments made by the APA in its brief. The structure of …

Learned Hand’S District Court Opinions, 1916-1917: A Macrostructural Analysis Employing Cognitive Psychology Principles, Jeffrey A. Van Detta

Jeffrey A. Van Detta

What makes a judge a good trial court writer? Should this be measured by the writing of the appeals court judges who review them? Does it even matter if trial court judges write well? Examining trial court opinions that Judge Learned Hand wrote 1916-1917 on the U.S. District Court, this article answers those questions by applying principles of cognitive psychology in a detailed critical evaluation of each opinion and its legal and society context. This article makes a very substantial contribution to the study of legal linguistics, cognitive psychology as applied in critical reading of judicial opinions, and of Learned …

The Wrongfulness Of Wrongly Interpreting Wrongfulness: Provocation Interpretational Bias And Heat Of Passion Homicide, Reid Griffith Fontaine

Reid G. Fontaine

In United States criminal law, a defendant charged with murder can invoke the heat of passion defense, an affirmative, partial-excuse defense so that he may be instead found guilty of the lesser crime of manslaughter. This defense requires the defendant to demonstrate that he was significantly provoked and, as a direct result of the provocation, became extremely emotionally disturbed and committed the killing while in this uncontrolled emotional state. In this way, the law makes a partial allowance for emotional dysfunction—the wrongfulness of the homicide is mitigated when the emotionally charged reactivity restricts the actor’s capacity for rational thought and …

Social Information Processing, Subtypes Of Violence, And A Progressive Construction Of Culpability And Punishment In Juvenile Justice, Reid Griffith Fontaine

Reid G. Fontaine

Consistent with core principles of liberal theories of punishment (including humane treatment of offenders, respecting offender rights, parsimony, penal proportionality, and rehabilitation), progressive frameworks have sought to expand doctrines of mitigation and excuse such that culpability and punishment may be reduced. With respect to juvenile justice, scholars have proposed that doctrinal mitigation be broadened, and that adolescents, due to aspects of developmental immaturity (such as decision making capacity), be punished less severely than adults who commit the same crimes. One model of adolescent antisocial behavior that may be useful to a progressive theory of punishment in juvenile justice distinguishes between …

Reactive Cognition, Reactive Emotion: Toward A More Psychologically-Informed Understanding Of Reactive Homicide, Reid G. Fontaine

Reid G. Fontaine

Recent scholarship has drawn attention to the alternative contributions of dysfunctional reactive cognition (e.g., provocation interpretational bias) and emotion (e.g., provoked fury) in heat of passion killings. Two main theses have been advanced. First, there exists a meaningful parallel between the instrumental/reactive aggression dichotomy in psychology and murder/manslaughter distinction in law. Second, analysis of this parallel suggests that the heat of passion (or provocation) defense disproportionately favors emotional over cognitive dysfunction in mitigating murder to manslaughter. These theses, though, have yet to be fully developed, and raise additional, critical questions that have not yet been addressed. For example, Other than …

The Identifiability Bias In Environmental Law, Shi-Ling Hsu

Shi-Ling Hsu

The identifiability effect is the human propensity to have stronger emotions regarding identifiable individuals or groups rather than abstract ones. The more information that is available about a person, the more likely this person's situation will influence human decision-making. This human propensity has biased law and public policy against environmental and ecological protection because the putative economic victims of environmental regulation are usually easily identifiable workers that lose their jobs, while the beneficiaries – people who avoid a premature death from air or water pollution, people who would be saved by medicinal compounds available only in rare plant and animal …

Pollution Tax Heuristics: An Empirical Study Of Willingness To Pay For Higher Gasoline Taxes, Shi-Ling Hsu, Joshua Walters, Anthony Purgas

Shi-Ling Hsu

Economists widely agree that in concept, pollution taxes are the most cost-effective means of reducing pollution. With the advent of monitoring and enforcement technologies, the case for pollution taxation is generally getting stronger on the merits. Despite widespread agreement among economists, however, pollution taxes remain unpopular, especially in North America. Some oppose pollution taxes because of a suspicion that government would misspend the tax proceeds, while others oppose pollution taxes because they would impose economic hardships upon certain individuals, groups, or industries. And there is no pollution tax more pathologically hated as the gasoline tax. This is unfortunate from an …

Some Quasi-Behavioral Arguments For Environmental Taxation, Shi-Ling Hsu

Shi-Ling Hsu

For decades, economists have advocated for the adoption of environmental taxes to reduce pollution at least cost. While this campaign has largely succeeded in Europe, where a wide variety of environmental taxes are in effect, environmental taxes are few and far between in North America, as economists have failed to persuade policymakers to make any significant policy use of environmental taxes. This paper presents three new arguments that draw heavily upon the behavioralist and organizational literatures, and augment the economic arguments proffered thus far in favor of environmental taxes.

First, environmental taxation creates conditions under which firms undertake creative processes …

The Social Psychology Of Evil: Can The Law Prevent Groups From Making Good People Go Bad?, David Crump

David Crump

In the year 2000, widespread official perjury by members of the Los Angeles Police Department led to investigations of nearly seventy officers and tainted hundreds of criminal convictions. A few years earlier, managers at Enron Corporation had tolerated and committed pervasive acts of fraud that lost billions of dollars for shareholders. And a few years later, jailers at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq photographed each other abusing detainees in ways that subjected themselves to prosecution and the United States to severe loss of international credibility. In each instance, citizens reading their newspapers must have wondered, “How could these things happen?” …

Situating Emotion: A Critical Realist View Of Emotion And Nonconscious Cognitive Processes For Law And Legal Theory, David J. Arkush

David J. Arkush

This Article attempts to clarify legal thinking about emotion in decision making. It surveys evidence from psychology and neuroscience on the extensive role that emotion and related nonconscious cognitive processes play in human behavior, then evaluates the treatment of emotion in three legal views of decision making: rational choice theory, behavioral economics, and cultural cognition theory. The Article concludes that each theory is mistaken to treat emotion mostly as a decision objective rather than a part of the decision-making process and, indeed, to treat it as a force that mostly compromises that process. The Article introduces the view that emotion …

Wrongly Accused Redux: How Race Contributes To Convicting The Innocent: The Informants Example, Andrew E. Taslitz

Andrew E. Taslitz

This article analyzes five forces that may raise the risk of convicting the innocent based upon the suspect's race: the selection, ratchet, procedural justice, bystanders, and aggressive-suspicion effects. In other words, subconscious forces press police to focus more attention on racial minorites, the ratchet makes this focus every-increasing, the resulting sense by the community of unfair treatment raises its involvment in crime while lowering its willingness to aid the police in resisting crime, innocent persons suffer when their skin color becomes associated with criminality, and the police use more aggressive techniques on racial minorities in a way that raises the …