Law Commons^™

Torture Warrants, Necessity, And Self-Defense, Fritz Allhoff

Fritz Allhoff

This article explores a debate over the legal mechanisms by which interrogational torture could be sanctioned. Four separate proposals are considered, including: civil disobedience; torture warrants; self-defense; and necessity. Civil disobedience does not allow for legalized torture, but may allow for reduced punishments. Torture warrants contrast with self-defense and necessity in terms of offering ex ante, as opposed to ex post, authorization; arguments for and against either approach are considered. While there has been some legal scholarship in relation to torture warrants, less has been said about ex post justifications. This article ultimately defends the appropriateness of the necessity defense …

Empirical Objections To Torture: A Critical Reply, Fritz Allhoff

Fritz Allhoff

Those who support torture in ticking-time-bomb cases are often criticized as failing to consider empirical objections to torture; however, torture’s critics often wield this charge uncritically, doing little more than throwing out platitudes without considering the role of those platitudes in the dialectic. I agree with the critics that more empirical engagement is owed than is typically on offer, but deny that such engagement vindicates their position. This essay therefore considers various stock objections to the actual use of torture, while ultimately arguing that those objections fail to undermine the use of torture in exceptional cases. In particular, we will …

Alternative Litigation Finance And The Work Product Doctrine, Grace M. Giesel

Grace M. Giesel

The Immorality Of Denial, Jonathan R. Cohen

Jonathan R. Cohen

This article is the first of a two-part series critically examining the role of lawyers in assisting clients in denying responsibility for harms they have caused. If a person injures another, the moral response is for the injurer actively to take responsibility for what he has done. In contrast, the common practice within our legal culture is for injurers to deny responsibility for harms they commit. The immoral, in other words, has become the legally normal. In this Article, Professor Cohen analyzes the moral foundations of responsibility-taking. He also explores the moral, psychological, and spiritual risks to injurers who knowingly …

Judicial Externship Evalution Online Version, Taras Zenyuk

Taras Zenyuk

You who are on the road must have a code that you can live by and so become yourself because the past is just a good bye. Teach your children well their father's hell did slowly go by and feed them on your dreams the one they picked the one you'll know by...

Law Firm Ethics In The Shadow Of Corporate Social Responsibility, Christopher J. Whelan

Christopher J Whelan

Corporate clients, and in particular global corporations, are gaining influence and control of law firm practices in ways that would have been unthinkable in the past. Through various mechanisms, such as ‘Outside Counsel Guidelines,’ ‘Codes of Practice’ and the like, corporate clients set standards which lawyers are expected to follow. We have examined over 20 sets of Guidelines and conducted over 20 interviews with outside, in-house and general counsel.

The topics incorporated in the guidelines vary to a great extent. However, while some clearly protect the direct and immediate interests of the client – provisions relating to billing and conflicts …

The Role Law Schools Should Play In Filling The Justice Gap, Karen Millard

Karen Millard

In the article, details about the current need for legal services in the United States are provided. For example, in 2010, nearly one in seven Americans lived below the poverty line, the highest proportion in nearly two decades. As the number of people living in poverty continues to increase, the number of people needing legal assistance also continues to grow. What is startling is that only about twenty percent of the legal needs of low-income people are being satisfied. One reason for this is that a total of less than one percent of the nation’s legal expenditures is given to …

Outing-- And Ousting-- The "Hidden" Hyde: Toward Repeal And Replacement Of The Hyde Amendment, Rebecca Stewart

Rebecca K Stewart

Poorly crafted statutes have always created interpretive quandaries for judges and litigants, and these problems naturally tend to be exacerbated when substantive legislation is passed as a result of less than substantive legislative processes, such as through limitations riders to appropriations bills. However, these issues become vastly more troublesome when Congress intentionally subverts measures intended to restrain such processes. This Article examines the passage of one such rider, commonly known as the Hyde Amendment, exploring its origins and curious subtextual codification, and analyzing its life in the federal courts over more than a dozen years.

The Article argues that early …

Note: Guiding The Modern Lawyer Through A Global Economy: An Analysis On Outsourcing And The Aba's 2012 Proposed Changes To The Model Rules, Patrick Poole

Patrick Poole

Over the last few decades, the dramatic changes that have occurred in the global economy have similarly altered the landscape for outsourced work both domestically and internationally. One study estimates that as many as 3.3 million white-collar jobs could be shipped abroad by 2015. This growing trend has also substantially affected the unique nature of the legal field. For the past year and a half, the American Bar Association (ABA) Ethics 20/20 Commission has been considering changes to the Model Rules of Professional Conduct as they relate to domestic and international outsourcing. The revision process has included soliciting input from …

Medical Marijuana Premises Leasing And Property Lawyer Dilemmas In Statutorily Altered States, Michael N. Widener

Michael N. Widener

This is a review article digesting certain writings in the fields of law and ethics involving medical marijuana during 2011-2012 after summarizing the history of federal and state enforcement of medical marijuana-related laws between the date of the Ogden Memorandum (DOJ, October 2009) and the spring of 2012.