Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Tort Reform Through Damages Law Reform, Stephen D. Sugarman
Tort Reform Through Damages Law Reform, Stephen D. Sugarman
Stephen D Sugarman
In this article I compare tort damages law in Australia (most expecially recent reforms in New South Wales) with that of the US, and I propose changes in the US rules based on Australian experience (and that of some other nations).
Let's Try Performance-Based Regulation To Attack Our Smoking And Obesity Problems, Stephen D. Sugarman
Let's Try Performance-Based Regulation To Attack Our Smoking And Obesity Problems, Stephen D. Sugarman
Stephen D Sugarman
Instead of "command and control" regulation, and instead of litigation, let's try "performance-based regulation" as a way to force enterprises that are responsible for our obesity and smoking problems to solve them.
Making The Food And Beverage Industry Take Responsibility For Reducing Childhood Obesity: A Market-Based Approach To Public Health, Stephen D. Sugarman
Making The Food And Beverage Industry Take Responsibility For Reducing Childhood Obesity: A Market-Based Approach To Public Health, Stephen D. Sugarman
Stephen D Sugarman
How we might attack childhood obesity through performance based regulation, requiring food and beverage companies to solve the problem they have created.
Comparing Tobacco And Gun Litigation, Stephen D. Sugarman
Comparing Tobacco And Gun Litigation, Stephen D. Sugarman
Stephen D Sugarman
No abstract provided.
Conflicts Of Interest In The Roles Of The University Professor, Stephen D. Sugarman
Conflicts Of Interest In The Roles Of The University Professor, Stephen D. Sugarman
Stephen D Sugarman
American universities are increasingly proactive in dealing with conflict of interest problems of their faculty. Changing social norms, publicized scandals, and more have made both university administrators and faculty extra alert to the dangers of faculty infidelity to their roles as teachers and scholars. Personal interests — both financial and non-financial — appear increasingly to pressure faculty to behave inappropriately. Most faculty members resist those pressures. Yet, enough conduct that either is, or appears to be, improper has occurred to prompt the adoption by universities of an ever-more complex regulatory regime. This regime no longer relies primarily upon threats of …