Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Loving v. virginia (8)
- International law (7)
- Marriage (6)
- Race (6)
- Sexuality (6)
-
- Constitutional law (5)
- Civil rights (4)
- Federalism (4)
- Human Rights (4)
- International Law (4)
- Education (3)
- Family (3)
- Hedge funds (3)
- Immigration (3)
- Regulation (3)
- Same-sex marriage (3)
- American values (2)
- Bankruptcy (2)
- Circuit split (2)
- Civil Procedure (2)
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Constitutional interpretation (2)
- Corporations (2)
- Criminal law (2)
- Critical race (2)
- Economics (2)
- Evidence (2)
- First Amendment (2)
- Free speech (2)
- Human rights (2)
Articles 1 - 30 of 64
Full-Text Articles in Law
Turf Wars: Street Gangs And The Outer Limits Of Rico's "Affecting Commerce" Requirement, Frank D'Angelo
Turf Wars: Street Gangs And The Outer Limits Of Rico's "Affecting Commerce" Requirement, Frank D'Angelo
Fordham Law Review
In response to the increasingly vast economic impact of organized crime, Congress in 1970 enacted the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) to provide federal prosecutors additional tools to combat such crime. RICO requires that enterprises whose members are charged with violating the Act must “affect interstate commerce.” Courts have held that RICO may be applied to enterprises with no economic motivation so long as they minimally affect interstate commerce. However, given the Act's economic history and interstate commerce element, its application to noneconomic intrastate enterprises presents a special problem. This Note argues that, consistent with relevant Commerce Clause …
Rule 26(A)(2)(B) Of The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure: In The Interest Of Full Disclosure, Katherine A. Rocco
Rule 26(A)(2)(B) Of The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure: In The Interest Of Full Disclosure, Katherine A. Rocco
Fordham Law Review
This Note examines the varying interpretations of Rule 26(a)(2)(B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, an issue currently dividing the nation's circuit courts of appeal and district courts. Interpreting the Rule for its plain meaning yields an exemption for expert witnesses who are either treating physicians or employees of a party in the case. While some courts have followed this textualist approach, more have opted for a broader interpretation, imposing the expert report requirements of Rule 26 on employee experts and treating physicians under certain circumstances. In keeping with the spirit of the Rules, courts should interpret the Rule …
Home Ownership Risk Beyond A Subprime Crisis: The Role Of Delinquency Management, Melissa B. Jacoby
Home Ownership Risk Beyond A Subprime Crisis: The Role Of Delinquency Management, Melissa B. Jacoby
Fordham Law Review
A surge in delinquency among risky subprime home mortgages has produced calls for front-end regulatory fixes as well as emergency foreclosure avoidance interventions. Whatever the merit of those interventions, this Essay calls for home mortgage delinquency management to be conceptualized as an enduring component of housing policy. The Essay identifies and evaluates a framework for the management of delinquency that is not limited to formal foreclosure law and includes other debtor-creditor laws such as bankruptcy, industry loss mitigation efforts, and third-party interventions such as delinquency housing counseling. The Essay also proposes that delinquency management be evaluated through the lens of …
Prudential Standing Limitations On Lanham Act False Advertising Claims, Gregory Apgar
Prudential Standing Limitations On Lanham Act False Advertising Claims, Gregory Apgar
Fordham Law Review
Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act provides a federal cause of action for false advertising. There is considerable disagreement among the federal circuit courts over the proper way to determine standing under this statute. Much of the disagreement centers on how the plaintiff's status as a direct competitor of the defendant should affect the standing inquiry. This Note argues that the five-factor test currently used by the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Third, Fifth, and Eleventh Circuits is the best approach. Further, this Note argues that an allegation of a commercial injury by a direct competitor of the defendant …
From T-Shirts To Teaching: May Public Schools Constitutionally Regulate Antihomosexual Speech?, Amanda L. Houle
From T-Shirts To Teaching: May Public Schools Constitutionally Regulate Antihomosexual Speech?, Amanda L. Houle
Fordham Law Review
In applying the First Amendment in the public school context, courts are faced with the challenge of balancing the constitutional rights of students against the discretion of schools to control speech and conduct on school grounds. This Note focuses on the specific issue of public schools regulating antihomosexual speech. Evaluating the First Amendment rights of students expressing antihomosexual sentiment through private and school-sponsored mediums, this Note ultimately argues for a comprehensive standard permitting schools to regulate both private and school-sponsored student speech.
The Blurring Of The Lines: Children And Bans On Interracial Unions And Same-Sex Marriages, Carlos A. Ball
The Blurring Of The Lines: Children And Bans On Interracial Unions And Same-Sex Marriages, Carlos A. Ball
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Listening To The Interracial Canary: Contemporary Views On Interracial Relationships Among Blacks And Whites, Erica Chito Childs
Listening To The Interracial Canary: Contemporary Views On Interracial Relationships Among Blacks And Whites, Erica Chito Childs
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Time For Rights? Loving, Gay Marriage, And The Limits Of Legal Justice, Chandan Reddy
Time For Rights? Loving, Gay Marriage, And The Limits Of Legal Justice, Chandan Reddy
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
"Who Killed Katie Couric?" And Other Tales From The World Of Executive Compensation Reform, Kenneth M. Rosen
"Who Killed Katie Couric?" And Other Tales From The World Of Executive Compensation Reform, Kenneth M. Rosen
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Direct Democracy And The Electoral College: Can A Popular Initiative Change How A State Appoints Its Electors?, Michael Mclaughlin
Direct Democracy And The Electoral College: Can A Popular Initiative Change How A State Appoints Its Electors?, Michael Mclaughlin
Fordham Law Review
This Note explores the constitutionality of a proposed popular initiative in California that would direct the manner in which the state appoints presidential electors. Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution gives the state legislature the power to direct the manner in which the state appoints its presidential electors. The issue presented in this Note is whether a popular initiative qualifies as a “state legislature” under Article II, Section 1, Clause 2. To answer this question, this Note first examines the history of the Elector Appointment Clause, with respect to the Electoral College and in light of …
Are Storylines Patentable? Testing The Boundaries Of Patentable Subject Matter, Anu R. Sawkar
Are Storylines Patentable? Testing The Boundaries Of Patentable Subject Matter, Anu R. Sawkar
Fordham Law Review
This Note examines doctrinal issues relating to the patentability of nonphysical inventions by assessing a proposal to patent storylines for use in books and movies. Analyzing recent and historical case law regarding the limits of patentable subject matter, this Note identifies four points of doctrinal tension whose resolution will determine the extent to which nonphysical inventions, such as the storyline proposal, are patentable. This Note suggests how the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit should resolve these tensions in upcoming cases and proposes boundaries for the patentability of nonphysical inventions.
Reconciling Morse With Brandenburg, Steven Penaro
Reconciling Morse With Brandenburg, Steven Penaro
Fordham Law Review
This Note examines Morse v. Frederick in connection with the Brandenburg v. Ohio test governing speech that advocates unlawful acts. In Morse, the U.S. Supreme Court devised a new test that gives school officials the power to restrict student speech promoting the use of illegal drugs. However, in Brandenburg, the Supreme Court held that speech must be struck down if the speaker intends to incite imminent lawless action and that speech is likely to produce such action. This Note argues that a relaxed application of the Brandenburg standard would be useful in prohibiting student drug speech within a school setting.
Should Preemption Apply In A Pharmaceutical Context? An Analysis Of The Preemption Debate And What Regulatory Compliance Statutes Contribute To The Discussion, Jennifer A. Surprenant
Should Preemption Apply In A Pharmaceutical Context? An Analysis Of The Preemption Debate And What Regulatory Compliance Statutes Contribute To The Discussion, Jennifer A. Surprenant
Fordham Law Review
Should the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)’s determination that a product is safe negate a private litigant’s cause of action under state law in all circumstances, unless the FDA determines that the manufacturer withheld relevant information regarding the safety of the product? This Note concludes that such federal preemption is proper because the FDA is fully capable of making a determination regarding the adequacy of the information disclosed by a pharmaceutical manufacturer without state interference. Additionally, such interference on the state level hinders the FDA’s objectives and effective functioning. Thus, determinations about the adequacy of the information provided to the …
Can The Trustee Recover? Imputation Of Fraud To Bankruptcy Trustees In Suits Against Third-Party Service Providers, Samuel C. Wasserman
Can The Trustee Recover? Imputation Of Fraud To Bankruptcy Trustees In Suits Against Third-Party Service Providers, Samuel C. Wasserman
Fordham Law Review
Corporate fraud has become a familiar headline over the last decade and has forced several companies whose managers have committed that fraud to file for bankruptcy. In these cases, a trustee will often be appointed to represent and manage the bankruptcy estate. This trustee is vested with the rights of the debtor corporation upon filing and may try to sue third-party service providers (e.g., accounting firms, law firms, investment banks) for conspiring in, or negligently failing to detect, the fraud. Federal and state courts have disagreed over whether the bankruptcy trustee should be permitted to recover damages from these third …
International Law And The Constitution: Terms Of Engagement, Foreword, Catherine Powell
International Law And The Constitution: Terms Of Engagement, Foreword, Catherine Powell
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Upstairs, Downstairs: Subnational Incorporation Of International Human Rights Law At The End Of An Era, Martha F. Davis
Upstairs, Downstairs: Subnational Incorporation Of International Human Rights Law At The End Of An Era, Martha F. Davis
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
American Ideals & Human Rights: Findings From New Public Opinion Research By The Opportunity Agenda, Alan Jenkins, Kevin Shawn Hsu
American Ideals & Human Rights: Findings From New Public Opinion Research By The Opportunity Agenda, Alan Jenkins, Kevin Shawn Hsu
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Role Of International Bodies In Influencing U.S. Policy To End Violence Against Women, Lenora M. Lapidus
The Role Of International Bodies In Influencing U.S. Policy To End Violence Against Women, Lenora M. Lapidus
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Keynote Address, A Community Of Reason And Rights, Harold Hongju Koh, William Michael Treanor
Keynote Address, A Community Of Reason And Rights, Harold Hongju Koh, William Michael Treanor
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Medellin's Clear Statement Rule: A Solution For International Delegations, Julian G. Ku
Medellin's Clear Statement Rule: A Solution For International Delegations, Julian G. Ku
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Getting Beyond The Crossfire Phenomenon: A Militant Moderate's Take On The Role Of Foreign Authority In Constitutional Interpretation, Melissa A. Waters
Getting Beyond The Crossfire Phenomenon: A Militant Moderate's Take On The Role Of Foreign Authority In Constitutional Interpretation, Melissa A. Waters
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Lower Courts And Constitutional Comparativism, Roger P. Alford
Lower Courts And Constitutional Comparativism, Roger P. Alford
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Humanity Law: A New Interpretive Lens On The International Sphere, Ruti Teitel
Humanity Law: A New Interpretive Lens On The International Sphere, Ruti Teitel
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Corporate Governance And Public Policy Implications Of Activist Distressed Debt Investing, Michelle M. Harner
The Corporate Governance And Public Policy Implications Of Activist Distressed Debt Investing, Michelle M. Harner
Fordham Law Review
Activist institutional investors traditionally have invested in a company's equity to try to influence change at the company. Some of these investors, however, are now purchasing a company's debt for this same purpose. They may seek to change a company's management and board personnel, operational strategies, asset holding, or capital structure. The Chapter 11 bankruptcy cases of Allied Holdings, Inc. and its affiliates exemplify the stategies of activist distressed debt investors. In the Allied cases, Yucaipa Companies, a distressed debt investor, puchased approximately 66% of Allied's outstanding general unsecured bond debt. Yucaipa used this debt position to exert significant influence …
Protecting Status: The Mortgage Crisis, Eminent Domain, And The Ethic Of The Homeownership, Rachel D. Godsil, David V. Simunovich
Protecting Status: The Mortgage Crisis, Eminent Domain, And The Ethic Of The Homeownership, Rachel D. Godsil, David V. Simunovich
Fordham Law Review
Homeownership is in crisis. Millions of families are at risk of foreclosure as they are caught between declining housing values and rising interest payments on adjustable-rate mortgages. The primary concern for such families is not that they will become homeless—most families who lose their homes could afford to become renters—but rather that they will lose their status as homeowners. For families required to sell their property by the government’s use of eminent domain, a similar issue arises, as the “fair market value” of some homes (the standard measure of compensation) is generally not enough to allow the family to purchase …
Intentional Sex Torts, Deana Pollard Sacks
Intentional Sex Torts, Deana Pollard Sacks
Fordham Law Review
Intentional tort law generally protects personal autonomy and self-determination vigorously by requiring fair disclosure before consent to physical contact is considered voluntary and valid. A glaring exception exists regarding consent to sexual relations. Although American law historically has provided remedies for fraudulent or other tortious inducement of sexual relations, current sex tort jurisprudence offers virtually no protection. The law’s contemporary “caveat emptor” approach to cases of sexual autonomy infringement is inappropriate because it departs from fundamental principles of intentional tort doctrine. In addition, the current law supports a “false” norm that sexual misappropriation is acceptable. Current law fails to protect …
Interpreting The Phrase "Newly Discovered Evidence": May Previously Unavailable Exculpatory Testimony Serve As The Basis For A Motion For A New Trial Under Rule 33?, Mary Ellen Brennan
Interpreting The Phrase "Newly Discovered Evidence": May Previously Unavailable Exculpatory Testimony Serve As The Basis For A Motion For A New Trial Under Rule 33?, Mary Ellen Brennan
Fordham Law Review
Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure permits a federal court to grant a new trial to a criminal defendant if the “interest of justice so requires,” specifying as one potential basis the availability of “newly discovered evidence.” The federal circuit courts have disagreed as to whether postconviction testimony proffered by a codefendant who had remained silent at trial may serve as the basis for a Rule 33 motion grounded on newly discovered evidence. A majority of the federal circuits, including, most recently, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, have held that, while a codefendant’s …
Restoring The Grand Jury, Kevin K. Washburn
Restoring The Grand Jury, Kevin K. Washburn
Fordham Law Review
Though it is enshrined in the Constitution, the grand jury is one of the least respected institutions in American criminal justice today. Scholars regard the grand jury just as doctors regard the appendix: an organic part of our constitutional makeup, but not of much use. While scholars have proposed reforms, most of them seem only loosely related to the fundamental purpose of the grand jury. In an era of plea bargains, the grand jury can serve a crucial role in insuring popular legitimacy in the criminal justice system. In light of the criticism, however, the grand jury seems to be …
The Emerging First Amendment Law Of Managerial Prerogative, Lawrence Rosenthal
The Emerging First Amendment Law Of Managerial Prerogative, Lawrence Rosenthal
Fordham Law Review
In Garcetti v. Ceballos, the U.S. Supreme Court, by the narrowest of margins, held that allegations of police perjury made in memoranda to his superiors by Richard Ceballos, a supervisory prosecutor in the Los Angeles County District Attorney's office, were unprotected by the First Amendment because “his expressions were made pursuant to his duties.” The academic reaction to this holding has been harshly negative; scholars argue that the holding will prevent the public from learning of governmental misconduct that is known only to those working within the bowels of the government itself. This Article rejects the scholarly consensus on Garcetti. …
The Multiracial Epiphany Of Loving, Kevin Noble Maillard
The Multiracial Epiphany Of Loving, Kevin Noble Maillard
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.