Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Boston College Law School (33)
- University of Michigan Law School (26)
- Selected Works (22)
- University of San Diego (15)
- University of Montana (12)
-
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (12)
- Barry University School of Law (11)
- Roger Williams University (11)
- University of Maine School of Law (11)
- Pepperdine University (11)
- American University Washington College of Law (10)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (10)
- Columbia Law School (9)
- Brooklyn Law School (9)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (9)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (7)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (7)
- Fordham Law School (7)
- University of Colorado Law School (6)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (6)
- University of Georgia School of Law (6)
- Duke Law (6)
- William & Mary Law School (5)
- Notre Dame Law School (4)
- Georgia State University College of Law (4)
- Mercer University School of Law (4)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (4)
- Southern Methodist University (4)
- Florida State University College of Law (4)
- Boston University School of Law (3)
- Keyword
-
- Administrative law (38)
- Regulation (30)
- Rulemaking (17)
- Judicial review (10)
- Innovation (9)
-
- Administrative Law (9)
- Environmental Protection Agency (9)
- Deference (8)
- Law reform (8)
- Congress (8)
- California legislation (8)
- Separation of powers (8)
- Regulations (7)
- Ohio (7)
- State law; State administrative decision (7)
- Immigration (6)
- Securities and Exchange Commission (6)
- Constitutional law (6)
- Chevron (6)
- Administrative Procedure Act (6)
- Agency (5)
- Governance (5)
- Accountability (5)
- Environmental law (5)
- Enforcement (5)
- Clean Water Act (5)
- Disclosure (5)
- Statutory interpretation (5)
- Agencies (4)
- Administrative law judge (4)
- Publication
-
- Articles (20)
- Faculty Scholarship (20)
- California Regulatory Law Reporter (15)
- Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review (12)
- Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law (12)
-
- Public Land & Resources Law Review (12)
- Maine Law Review (11)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (10)
- Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law (9)
- Michigan Law Review (8)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (8)
- Sea Grant Law Fellow Publications (8)
- Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law (8)
- Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions (7)
- Faculty Publications (6)
- Boston College Law School Faculty Papers (6)
- Boston College Law Review (6)
- Scholarly Works (6)
- Environmental and Earth Law Journal (EELJ) (6)
- Fordham Law Review (6)
- Boston College International and Comparative Law Review (5)
- American University Law Review (4)
- Indiana Law Journal (4)
- Boston College Journal of Law & Social Justice (4)
- Northwestern University Law Review (4)
- Lisa PytlikZillig Publications (4)
- Cleveland State Law Review (3)
- Indonesia Law Review (3)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (3)
- Daniel Lyons (3)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 357
Full-Text Articles in Law
What Congress's Repeal Efforts Can Teach Us About Regulatory Reform, Cary Coglianese, Gabriel Scheffler
What Congress's Repeal Efforts Can Teach Us About Regulatory Reform, Cary Coglianese, Gabriel Scheffler
Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law
Major legislative actions during the early part of the 115th Congress have undermined the central argument for regulatory reform measures such as the REINS Act, a bill that would require congressional approval of all new major regulations. Proponents of the REINS Act argue that it would make the federal regulatory system more democratic by shifting responsibility for regulatory decisions away from unelected bureaucrats and toward the people’s representatives in Congress. But separate legislative actions in the opening of the 115th Congress only call this argument into question. Congress’s most significant initiatives during this period — its derailed attempts to ...
How Big Money Ruined Public Life In Wisconsin, Lynn Adelman
How Big Money Ruined Public Life In Wisconsin, Lynn Adelman
Cleveland State Law Review
This Article discusses how Wisconsin fell from grace. Once a model good government state that pioneered many democracy-enhancing laws, in a very short time, Wisconsin became a state where special interest money, most of which is undisclosed, dominates politics. This Article identifies several factors as being critical to Wisconsin’s descent. These include the state’s failure to nurture and build on the campaign finance reforms enacted in the 1970s and both the state’s and the United States Supreme Court’s failure to adequately regulate sham issue ads. As evidence of Wisconsin’s diminished status, this Article describes how ...
Ohio's Modern Courts Amendment Must Be Amended: Why And How, Richard S. Walinski, Mark D. Wagoner Jr.
Ohio's Modern Courts Amendment Must Be Amended: Why And How, Richard S. Walinski, Mark D. Wagoner Jr.
Cleveland State Law Review
A 1968 amendment to the Ohio Constitution granted the Supreme Court of Ohio the authority to promulgate “rules governing practice and procedure” for Ohio courts. The amendment also provided that “[a]ll laws in conflict with such rules shall be of no further force or effect after such rules have taken effect” and that no rule may “abridge, enlarge, or modify any substantive right.”
Although the amendment was explicit about automatic repeal of existing laws, it says nothing about whether the General Assembly may legislate on a procedural matter after a court rule takes effect. That silence has caused enduring ...
Stuck In Ohio's Legal Limbo, How Many Mistrials Are Too Many Mistrials?: Exploring New Factors That Help A Trial Judge In Ohio Know Whether To Exercise Her Authority To Dismiss An Indictment With Prejudice, Especially Following Repeated Hung Juries, Samantha M. Cira
Cleveland State Law Review
Multiple mistrials following validly-prosecuted trials are becoming an increasingly harsh reality in today’s criminal justice system. Currently, the Ohio Supreme Court has not provided any guidelines to help its trial judges know when to make the crucial decision to dismiss an indictment with prejudice following a string of properly-declared mistrials, especially due to repeated hung juries. Despite multiple mistrials that continue to result in no conviction, criminal defendants often languish behind bars, suffering detrimental psychological harm and a loss of personal freedom as they remain in “legal limbo” waiting to retry their case. Furthermore, continuously retrying defendants cuts against ...
Indonesia's Energy Security: Are We Securing It Right? Lesson Learned From The Eu, Afghania Dwiesta
Indonesia's Energy Security: Are We Securing It Right? Lesson Learned From The Eu, Afghania Dwiesta
Indonesia Law Review
Over the past few years, one of Indonesia’s state-owned enterprises, PLN, has conducted dialogues focusing on developing a new value-creative business model to transform itself, a sleepy regulated utility, into a truly competitive electricity service provider. However, efforts to preserve the prominence of the Country’s electricity sector have been ongoing as the sector is still experiencing sustained rolling blackouts, net import dependency and lack of transmission facility enforcement throughout the Indonesian archipelago. Such efforts have been varied from the incentivise policy and programs such as the Public-Private Partnership and the two phases of Fast Track Program. The reformation ...
Mays V. City Of Flint, Michigan, Nathan A. Burke
Mays V. City Of Flint, Michigan, Nathan A. Burke
Public Land & Resources Law Review
In Mays v. City of Flint Michigan, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality employees removed a class action against them in the Michigan state court to federal court under the federal-officer removal statute. This court ruled in favor of the residents of Flint, determining that the federal officer removal statute did not give the federal court jurisdiction over a state agency simply because the agency must follow federal rules. The court held that Michigan Department of Environmental Quality employees could not have been “acting under” the federal government even though the state agency’s enforcement authority could be trumped by the ...
Dep’T Of Health & Human Serv.’S V. Samantha Inc., 133 Nev. Adv. Op. 100 (Dec. 14, 2017), Sara Schreiber
Dep’T Of Health & Human Serv.’S V. Samantha Inc., 133 Nev. Adv. Op. 100 (Dec. 14, 2017), Sara Schreiber
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Under the Nevada Administrative Procedure Act (APA), the right to petition for judicial review is limited to contested cases. When Nevada’s Department of Health and Human Services (the Department) denies an applicant a registration certificate to operate a medical marijuana dispensary, it is not a contested case under the APA. Since it is not a contested case, the applicant cannot petition the court for judicial review.
Private Prisons And The Need For Greater Transparency: Private Prison Information Act, Libbi L. Vilher
Private Prisons And The Need For Greater Transparency: Private Prison Information Act, Libbi L. Vilher
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
Private prisons are not subject to the same regulations as government prisons. Particularly, private prisons are exempt from the requirements set forth in the Freedom of Information Act and its state equivalents, which provide that the public has an enforceable right to request certain records from government agencies. Numerous efforts made by members of Congress to enact the Private Prison Information Act, a bill that would subject private prisons to disclosure laws found in the Freedom of Information Act, have been unsuccessful. Such efforts to strip the veil of secrecy that shades private prisons from public scrutiny are especially important ...
Baking Common Sense Into The Ferpa Cake: How To Meaningfully Protect Student Rights And The Public Interest, Zach Greenberg, Adam Goldstein
Baking Common Sense Into The Ferpa Cake: How To Meaningfully Protect Student Rights And The Public Interest, Zach Greenberg, Adam Goldstein
Journal of Legislation
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Amici Curiae Finance Regulation Scholars In Support Of Plaintiff's Motion For A Preliminary Injunction In English V. Trump, Patricia A. Mccoy
Brief Of Amici Curiae Finance Regulation Scholars In Support Of Plaintiff's Motion For A Preliminary Injunction In English V. Trump, Patricia A. Mccoy
Boston College Law School Faculty Papers
Professor McCoy was the lead author of an amicus brief in support of the lawsuit by CFPB Deputy Director Leandra English against the Trump Administration, asserting that she lawfully became the Acting Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau under the Dodd-Frank Act.
Cybersecurity And Tax Information: A Vicious Cycle?, Diane M. Ring
Cybersecurity And Tax Information: A Vicious Cycle?, Diane M. Ring
Boston College Law School Faculty Papers
A review of Michael Hatfield, Cybersecurity and Tax Reform, 93 Ind. L.J., scheduled to be published in Spring 2018.
United States V. Osage Wind, Llc, Summer Carmack
United States V. Osage Wind, Llc, Summer Carmack
Public Land & Resources Law Review
The Osage Nation, as owner of the beneficial interest in its mineral estate, issues federally-approved leases to persons and entities who wish to conduct mineral development on its lands. After an energy-development company, Osage Wind, leased privately-owned surface lands within Tribal reservation boundaries and began to excavate minerals for purposes of constructing a wind farm, the United States brought suit on the Tribe’s behalf. In the ensuing litigation, the Osage Nation insisted that Osage Wind should have obtained a mineral lease from the Tribe before beginning its work. In its decision, the Tenth Circuit applied one of the Indian ...
Rus V Comcare: The Rules Of Evidence In The Aat, Nicholas Cardaci
Rus V Comcare: The Rules Of Evidence In The Aat, Nicholas Cardaci
The University of Notre Dame Australia Law Review
The Rus v Comcare cases arise from a claim for compensation by the widowed Ms Rus. The cases saw a highly contentious piece of evidence tendered. This evidence was hearsay of a lay opinion that answered the ultimate issue. The evidence was considered by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (‘AAT’) and the Federal Court of Australia (‘Court’). These considerations demonstrate the uncertainty of how the rules of evidence are applicable in tribunals. Specifically, the cases raise applicability of the rules against opinion and hearsay evidence. Further, the relevance of delay and the parol evidence rule to these cases is raised. The ...
Administrative Law, Jennifer B. Alewine, Courtney E. Ferrell, Allison W. Pryor
Administrative Law, Jennifer B. Alewine, Courtney E. Ferrell, Allison W. Pryor
Mercer Law Review
This Article surveys cases from the Georgia Supreme Court and the Georgia Court of Appeals from June 1, 2016 through May 31, 2017 in which principles of administrative law were a central focus of the case. The Article first discusses the exhaustion of administrative remedies, followed by decisions by state administrative agencies, then on to scope of authority, statutory construction, a review of administrative decisions, and concludes with a brief review of enactments from the 2017 regular session of the Georgia General Assembly.
Plenary Power In The Modern Administrative State, Catherine Y. Kim
Plenary Power In The Modern Administrative State, Catherine Y. Kim
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Ocr's Bind: Administrative Rulemaking And Campus Sexual Assault Protections, Sheridan Caldwell
Ocr's Bind: Administrative Rulemaking And Campus Sexual Assault Protections, Sheridan Caldwell
Northwestern University Law Review
During President Barack Obama’s Administration, significant light was shed on the depth of the United States’ campus sexual assault problem. As a result, the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights increased enforcement of Title IX provisions by way of its 2011 “Dear Colleague Letter.” This Note argues that the Dear Colleague Letter was improperly enforced as if it were a formal legislative rule and was therefore illegitimate. Nevertheless, this Note contends that the preponderance of the evidence standard initially enshrined within the Dear Colleague Letter should be adopted through the notice-and-comment procedures President Donald Trump’s Administration ...
‘Airbnb’ In Western Australia: New Issues For Policy Makers Arising From A ‘Disruptive Innovatation', Bertus De Villiers
‘Airbnb’ In Western Australia: New Issues For Policy Makers Arising From A ‘Disruptive Innovatation', Bertus De Villiers
The University of Notre Dame Australia Law Review
The short terms rental market, colloquially referred to as ‘Airbnb’ accommodation, has proliferated the Australian (and international) accommodation market. The number of rooms being made available per nights in Australia via sort term rental websites runs into the hundreds of thousands. Policy makers have generally been slow to respond to this ‘disruptive innovation’. It is particularly in strata title schemes where the legality of short term rentals is being tested. In this article consideration is given to a recent judgement of the Supreme Court of Appeal in Western Australia to uphold a decision of the State Administrative Tribunal whereby a ...
Protecting Whistleblowing (And Not Just Whistleblowers), Evan J. Ballan
Protecting Whistleblowing (And Not Just Whistleblowers), Evan J. Ballan
Michigan Law Review
When the government contracts with private parties, the risk of fraud runs high. Fraud against the government hurts everyone: taxpayer money is wasted on inferior or nonexistent products and services, and the public bears the burdens attendant to those inadequate goods. To combat fraud, Congress has developed several statutory frameworks to encourage whistleblowers to come forward and report wrongdoing in exchange for a monetary reward. The federal False Claims Act allows whistleblowers to file an action in federal court on behalf of the United States, and to share in any recovery. Under the Dodd- Frank Act, the SEC Office of ...
Opening The Gates Of Cow Palace: Regulating Runoff Manure As A Hazardous Waste Under Rcra, Reed J. Mccalib
Opening The Gates Of Cow Palace: Regulating Runoff Manure As A Hazardous Waste Under Rcra, Reed J. Mccalib
Michigan Law Review
In 2015, a federal court held for the first time that the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) may regulate runoff manure as a “solid waste” under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”). The holding of Community Ass’n for Restoration of the Environment, Inc. v. Cow Palace, LLC opened the gates to regulation of farms under the nation’s primary toxic waste statute. This Comment argues that, once classified as a “solid waste,” runoff manure fits RCRA’s definition of “hazardous waste” as well. This reclassification would expand EPA’s authority to monitor and respond to the nation’s tragically ...
Current Navigation Points In Drug Diversion Law: Hidden Rocks In Shallow, Murky, Drug-Infested Waters, John J. Mulrooney Ii, Katherine E. Legel
Current Navigation Points In Drug Diversion Law: Hidden Rocks In Shallow, Murky, Drug-Infested Waters, John J. Mulrooney Ii, Katherine E. Legel
Marquette Law Review
None
Regulating Black-Box Medicine, W. Nicholson Price Ii
Regulating Black-Box Medicine, W. Nicholson Price Ii
Michigan Law Review
Data drive modern medicine. And our tools to analyze those data are growing ever more powerful. As health data are collected in greater and greater amounts, sophisticated algorithms based on those data can drive medical innovation, improve the process of care, and increase efficiency. Those algorithms, however, vary widely in quality. Some are accurate and powerful, while others may be riddled with errors or based on faulty science. When an opaque algorithm recommends an insulin dose to a diabetic patient, how do we know that dose is correct? Patients, providers, and insurers face substantial difficulties in identifying high-quality algorithms; they ...
Privatizing Regulatory Enforcement: A Preliminary Assessment Of Citizen Suits Under Federal Environmental Laws, Barry Boyer, Errol Meidinger
Privatizing Regulatory Enforcement: A Preliminary Assessment Of Citizen Suits Under Federal Environmental Laws, Barry Boyer, Errol Meidinger
Errol Meidinger
This article provides a preliminary assessment of the potential effects of the privatization of regulatory enforcement and speculates on what such a realignment might portend for the regulatory process. Based primarily on an indepth review of the first wave of citizen suits brought under the federal Clean Water and Clean Air Acts, it identifies four key problems that can undermine the citizen suit as a device for regulatory enforcement: (1) Citizen suits must surmount a series of doctrinal barriers that could make it difficult or impossible to mount an effective private enforcement campaign. Courts have generally been able to control ...
Survey Says: Army Corps No Scalian Despot, Kim Diana Connolly
Survey Says: Army Corps No Scalian Despot, Kim Diana Connolly
Kim Diana Connolly
Justice Antonin Scalia and others have described the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ('the Corps') administration of the permitting process as burdensome and inefficient. Empirical data gathered from the Corps, however, do not bear out this assessment. In this Article, Kim Diana Connolly evaluates data collected from Corps Customer Service Surveys as well as the apparent disconnect between applicant experiences and the public's negative perception of the permitting process. She begins the Article with an overview of the Corps' regulatory permitting process, then lays out the history of and context for the Corps' Customer Service Surveys. Next, she ...
Can Happy Subjects Have An Enlightened Despot? Customer Satisfaction Among Army Corps Permit Applicants, Kim Diana Connolly
Can Happy Subjects Have An Enlightened Despot? Customer Satisfaction Among Army Corps Permit Applicants, Kim Diana Connolly
Kim Diana Connolly
No abstract provided.
Has The Field Grown Too Complex For A State-Specific "Handbook" On Environmental Law? (Reviewing The Government Institute's South Carolina Environmental Law Handbook (3rd Ed. 2000)), Kim Diana Connolly
Kim Diana Connolly
No abstract provided.
Forces Of Federalism, Safety Nets, And Waivers, Edward H. Stiglitz
Forces Of Federalism, Safety Nets, And Waivers, Edward H. Stiglitz
Jed Stiglitz
Inequality is the defining feature of our times. Many argue it calls for a policy response, yet the most obvious policy responses require legislative action. And if inequality is the defining feature of our times, partisan acrimony and gridlock are the defining features of the legislature. So being, it is worth considering what role administrative agencies, and administrative law, might play in ameliorating or exacerbating economic inequality. Here, I focus on American safety net programs, many of which are joint operations between federal administrative agencies and state governments. In this context, a central mode of bureaucratic policy innovation comes in ...
Strategic Rulemaking Disclosure, Jennifer Nou, Edward H. Stiglitz
Strategic Rulemaking Disclosure, Jennifer Nou, Edward H. Stiglitz
Jed Stiglitz
Congressional enactments and executive orders instruct agencies to publish their anticipated rules in what is known as the Unified Agenda. The Agenda’s stated purpose is to ensure that political actors can monitor regulatory development. Agencies have come under fire in recent years, however, for conspicuous omissions and irregularities. Critics allege that agencies hide their regulations from the public strategically, that is, to thwart potential political opposition. Others contend that such behavior is benign, perhaps the inevitable result of changing internal priorities or unforeseen events. To examine these competing hypotheses, this Article uses a new dataset spanning over thirty years ...
Collaborative Gatekeepers, Stavros Gadinis, Colby Mangels University Of California - Berkeley
Collaborative Gatekeepers, Stavros Gadinis, Colby Mangels University Of California - Berkeley
Stavros Gadinis
In their efforts to hold financial institutions accountable after the 2007 financial crisis, U.S. regulators have repeatedly turned to anti-money-laundering laws. Initially designed to fight drug cartels and terrorists, these laws have recently yielded billion-dollar fines for all types of bank engagement in fraud and have spurred an overhaul of financial institutions’ internal compliance. This increased reliance on anti-money-laundering laws, we argue, is due to distinct features that can better help regulators gain insights into financial fraud. Most other financial laws enlist private firms as gatekeepers and hold them liable if they knowingly or negligently engage in client fraud ...
There And Back Again? Police Reforms Through The Prism Of The Recruitment Decisions In The High Court And The Court Of Appeal, Festus M. Kinoti
There And Back Again? Police Reforms Through The Prism Of The Recruitment Decisions In The High Court And The Court Of Appeal, Festus M. Kinoti
William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
How Much Is “Substantial Evidence” And How Big Is A “Significant Gap”?: The Telecommunications Attorney Full Employment Act, Susan Lorde Martin
How Much Is “Substantial Evidence” And How Big Is A “Significant Gap”?: The Telecommunications Attorney Full Employment Act, Susan Lorde Martin
William & Mary Business Law Review
The late U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia described the Telecommunications Act of 1996 as “a model of ambiguity or indeed even self-contradiction.” Legal wags have also described the Act as the Telecommunications Attorney Full Employment Act. Twenty years after the Act became law, it is still being interpreted by courts all over the country and costing taxpayers millions of dollars as local governments defend their telecom decisions in lawsuits. The Act’s basic notion was to allow local zoning authorities to maintain their control over their territories with a few new limitations that would encourage cell phone service ...