Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Admission (1)
- Antitrust; leniency programs; work product doctrine; privilege; discovery; Federal Rule of Evidence 408 (1)
- Automatic reversal rule (1)
- Confession (1)
- Courts (1)
-
- Cross-examination (1)
- Direct Examination (1)
- Due Process Clause (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Harmless error rule (1)
- Illusion (1)
- Jury Members (1)
- Legal Profession (1)
- Magic (1)
- Magicians (1)
- Malinski v. New York (1)
- Practice and Procedure (1)
- Professional Ethics (1)
- Psychological Techniques (1)
- Psychology (1)
- Psychology and Psychiatry (1)
- Right to counsel (1)
- Sixth Amendment (1)
- Stroble v. California (1)
- Testimony (1)
- Trial Lawyers (1)
- Trial Skills (1)
- Trial Techniques (1)
- Witness Examination (1)
- Witness Manipulation (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Bloomberg Law Brief: Evidence Doctrine, Michael Best, Jeffrey Bellin, Andrew Guthrie Ferguson
Bloomberg Law Brief: Evidence Doctrine, Michael Best, Jeffrey Bellin, Andrew Guthrie Ferguson
Jeffrey Bellin
A discussion of a Supreme Court case over whether a juror may testify about statements made by another juror during deliberations.
Hiding The Elephant (How The Psychological Techniques Of Magicians Can Be Used To Manipulate Witnesses At Trial), Sydney A. Beckman
Hiding The Elephant (How The Psychological Techniques Of Magicians Can Be Used To Manipulate Witnesses At Trial), Sydney A. Beckman
Sydney A. Beckman
In 1917 Harry Houdini performed a single, yet incredible, illusion; “[u]nder the bright spotlights of New York’s Theatre Hippodrome, he made a live elephant disappear.” In 1983 David Copperfield made the Statue of Liberty Disappear in front of both a live and a national television audience. To be sure, neither the elephant nor Lady Liberty actually disappeared. But from the perspective of the audience they did, indeed, disappear. So which is correct? Did they, or didn’t they?
Trial Lawyers and Magicians share many of the same talents and skills. Misdirection, misinformation, selective-attention, ambiguity, verbal manipulation, body language interpretation, and physical …
No Good Whistle Goes Unpunished: Can We Protect European Antitrust Leniency Applications From Discovery?, Constanza Nicolosi
No Good Whistle Goes Unpunished: Can We Protect European Antitrust Leniency Applications From Discovery?, Constanza Nicolosi
Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business
In recent years, the most successful tool in the antitrust arsenal of the European Commission and the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice has proven to be leniency programs, which provide full immunity from fines to the first cartel-member that confesses its participation in the conspiracy. Even though European and U.S. leniency programs are fairly similar to one another, procedural differences may undermine their effectiveness. It has long been argued that potential discovery of corporate statements accompanying the leniency application before the Commission in subsequent proceedings in the United States would put the firms that cooperated with the …
Criminal Law-Confessions-Admission Of Illegally Obtained Confession In State Criminal Prosecution Is Harmless Error Not Requiring Reversal Of Conviction--People V. Jacobson, Michigan Law Review
Criminal Law-Confessions-Admission Of Illegally Obtained Confession In State Criminal Prosecution Is Harmless Error Not Requiring Reversal Of Conviction--People V. Jacobson, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Defendant voluntarily admitted that he had murdered his daughter to a social worker, two ambulance attendants, and three police officers sent to investigate the incident. He continued to declare his guilt to these officers after his arrest, on the way to the police station, and at the police station where he was interrogated without the benefit of counsel although he had not waived his right to counsel. All of the confessions-approximately ten-were admitted in evidence at the defendant's trial over his objection that the two confessions obtained during the interrogation should have been excluded since he had been denied his …