Law Commons^™

Judicial Review And Deliberative Politics. A Tension In Need Of Analysis., Donald E. Bello Hutt

Donald E. Bello Hutt

Champions of judicial review of legislation have defended this institution even before John Marshall decided Marbury v. Madison in 1803. Nevertheless, those defenses have to face with several difficulties, both practical and abstract. The aim of this paper is to analyze those difficulties and the context in which the defenses have been successful. We shall discuss the origins of judicial review in the work of James Iredell, Alexander Hamilton and John Marshall in order to introduce not only the first defenses of judicial review, but to fix the political context and dominant constitutional philosophy at their time: departmentalism and popular …

Playing The Race Card: White Americans’ Sense Of Victimization In Response To Affirmative Action, Brett Hammon

Brett Hammon

“They marched on Washington to reclaim civil rights. They complained of voter intimidation at the polls. They called for ethnic studies programs to promote racial pride. They are, some say, the new face of racial oppression in this nation -- and their faces are White.”a A 2011 poll indicates that Whites have now come to view anti-White bias as a bigger problem than anti-Black bias.b Based on recent Supreme Court opinions, most of the Justices apparently agree that Whites are today’s true victims, as the Court has continued to steadfastly stand up for the rights of White plaintiffs against discrimination …

The Haunting Of Abigail Fisher: Race, Affirmative Action, And The Ghosts Of Legal History, Hilary A. Leewong

Hilary A Leewong

What is race in 2012, and why does it matter?

At the end of the current term, the Supreme Court will decide Fisher v. University of Texas. In doing so, the Court revisits the role of affirmative action and the meaning of race much sooner than constitutional law scholars, and likely the average college applicant, expected it would.

The Court’s last definitive take on the subject was conveyed by Justice O’Connor in 2003’s Grutter v. Bollinger. Justice O’Connor’s opinion conveyed disappointment that race-based admissions in higher education was still necessary this long after Brown v. Board of Education, heralded the …

From Pyramids To Stories: Cognitive Reconstruction Of Local Government Authority, John Martinez

John Martinez

This article describes a cognitive science approach to law, uses it to critically evaluate conventional "pyramid" legal analysis of local government authority, and suggests stories as alternative models for defining such authority. The article suggests that stories better reveal what is at stake in regard to local government authority and thus helps us to arrive at better solutions. The article illustrates the storytelling analytical approach in three situations: a local government's condemnation of private property for resale to a private developer, the delegation of land use control authority to neighborhood groups, and local government attempts to zone out nontraditional families.

Litigation-Fostered Bureaucratic Autonomy: Administrative Law Against Political Control, Daniel E. Walters

Daniel E Walters

No abstract provided.

Evading Emergency: Strengthening Emergency Response Through Integrated Pluralistic Governance, Lance Gable

Lance Gable

This Article examines the significant governance challenges that arise during responses to public health emergencies and proposes a new multifaceted strategy—integrated pluralistic governance—to address these challenges. Emergency preparedness is an inherently complex problem that entails the integration of scientific and medical expertise, good logistical planning, and clear laws and policies. The governance function has particular import for public health emergencies because pandemics, hurricanes, and other disasters can have profoundly divisive social and political consequences. Moreover, recent disasters like Hurricane Katrina and the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill revealed an emergency preparedness and response infrastructure in the United States that was …

Partisanship, Politics, And The Voting Rights Act: The Curious Case Of U.S. V. Ike Brown, Donald E. Campbell

Donald E. Campbell

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 has been described as the “crown jewel” of the civil rights movement. The success of the Act to remove official obstacles to voting is undeniable, and the influx of African American voters into the political system changed the nature of politics in the United States at all levels. The political and cultural context has changed so greatly that in 2006, it was politically possible for the Justice Department of President George W. Bush to bring the first claim against an African American for violating the voting rights of white citizens. This article seeks to …

Paul Clement And The State Of Conservative Legal Thought, Sam Singer

Sam Singer

If 2011 is remembered as the year the states stood up to the Obama Administration and its bold vision of federal power, Paul Clement will be remembered as the lawyer they chose to make their case to the Supreme Court. In addition to the healthcare challenge, Clement appeared on behalf of Arizona in defense of the State’s sweeping new immigration law and helped Texas defend its new electoral map against interference from the federal courts. Along the way, he became the go-to lawyer for the states’ rights cause--a “shadow Solicitor General” leading the states in their push to reclaim power …

Fragmenting The Judiciary: Potential Ideological Effects Of Shifting Implementation Of Supreme Court Doctrine From Federal Courts To State Courts, Ryan Walters

Ryan Walters

More than ever, the Supreme Court of the United States can rely on an army of life-tenured judges on lower federal courts to implement the doctrines it develops on statutory and constitutional issues. Those judges are shielded from public opinion on controversial rulings, and recent research has shown that the Supreme Court itself is more likely to be affected by elite opinion than that of the public.

Despite checks and balances being a centerpiece of the constitutional order, the increasing size and jurisdictional scope of the federal judiciary, combined with its lack of political accountability, has led to a increase …

Constitutional Newspeak: Learning To Love The Affordable Care Act Decision, A. Christopher Bryant

Aaron Christopher Bryant

Constitutional Newspeak: Learning to Love the Affordable Care Act Decision In his classic dystopian novel, 1984, George Orwell imagines a world in which language is regularly contorted to mean its opposite – as in the waging of war by the Ministry of Peace and infliction of torture by the Ministry of Love. A core claim of Orwell’s was that such abuse of language – which in his novel he labeled “Newspeak” -- would ultimately channel thought. Whatever the merits of this claim as a theory of linguistics, constitutional developments too recent to be called history demonstrate that as a practical …

Pro-Business Or Anti-Gay? Disguising Lgbt Animus As Economic Legislation, James A. Reed

Alex Reed

Several states are considering legislation that would prohibit cities from enacting nondiscrimination ordinances which are more inclusive than state law in terms of their protected classes. Although characterized as economic legislation, the evidence suggests that these bills are being introduced because of—not merely in spite of—their adverse effects upon the LGBT community. This article proposes that the Supreme Court apply heightened scrutiny to classifications based on sexual orientation and gender identity so as to expose the discriminatory motivations underlying these bills and ensure that courts are no longer complicit in denying LGBT Americans the equal protection of the laws.

Presidential Inaction And The Separation Of Powers, Jeffrey Love, Arpit Garg

Jeffrey Love

James Madison famously articulated a functional account of our governmental structure; he and his Federalist brethren created overlapping authority to prevent any single branch of government from acting unilaterally to dictate policy for the nation as a whole. And for more than two hundred years, the focus has been on just that: action. But the Framers and their intellectual heirs have failed to update their story to account for the government we have. In the modern administrative state, the President’s refusal to enforce duly enacted statutes—what we call “presidential inaction”—will often dictate national policy and yet will receive virtually none …

The Unity Thesis: How Positivism Distorts Constitutional Argument, John Lunstroth

John Lunstroth

Democracy and civil rights are distorted and polarizing ideas that pit the rich against the poor, and should be abandoned in favor of an emphasis on the common good. To reach that conclusion I argue the US Constitution is and has always been designed to protect the wealth of the ruling class. All political associations or states have this as a central idea. My argument rests on a unique jurisprudential principle, the Unity Thesis. The main school of legal theory, positivism (the science of law) is based on the idea law is always separate from morals. I argue the opposite, …

When Can You Teach An Old Law New Tricks?, Philip A. Wallach

Philip A Wallach

This article considers the distinctive legal and institutional dynamics involved when agencies interpret existing statutes for novel purposes. It argues that courts take into account policy-specific institutional factors, such as legislative dysfunction, when they consider the propriety of such novel interpretations, rather than employing universal ideas about institutional competencies. Where Congress has shown an inability to legislate in a policy area, courts are more likely to sympathize with changes in interpretation as partial substitutes for new legislation, but relying on old statutory language creates problems of statutory mismatch. The article contends that many arguments over statutory meaning mask disagreements about …

Restorative Justice In The Gilded Age: Shared Principles Underlying Two Movements In Criminal Justice, Ali M. Abid

Ali M Abid

Two very different approaches to Criminal Justice have developed in recent years suggesting systemic reforms that would reduce rates of crime and incarceration and lessen the disproportionate effect on minority groups and other suspect classes. The first of these is the Restorative Justice movement, which has programs operating in most US states and many countries around the world. The Restorative Justice movement focuses on reintegrating offenders with the community and having them repair the damage directly to their victims. The movement describes itself as based on the systems of indigenous and pre-modern societies and as wholly distinct from the conventional …

The Flaws Of Stem Cell Legislation: Sherley, Brustle, And Future Policy Challenges Posed By Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells, Nicholas J. Diamond

Nicholas J Diamond

In this article, I first contextualize the origins of disagreement over the nature and extent of human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research regulation. By analyzing two key pieces of hESC legislation as considered in two landmark court decisions—one from the United States and one from the European Union—I argue that current stem cell policies are deeply flawed. After surfacing the flaws of these policies, I examine novel challenges for policymakers posed by the newest advancement in stem cell science, induced pluripotent stem cells. In view of these novel challenges, I contend that current policies, which are hESC-focused and deeply flawed, …

The Ideological Divide: Conflict And The Supreme Court’S Certiorari Decision, Emily Grant, Scott A. Hendrickson, Michael S. Lynch

Emily Grant

This Article bridges a gap in existing literature by evaluating, from an empirical perspective, the impact of conflict among the lower courts on the Supreme Court’s decision to grant or deny a petition for a writ of certiorari. Specifically, this Article looks at the political ideology of the lower courts involved in a split of authority on federal law and compares those positions to the political ideology of the Supreme Court itself. This Article concludes that the ideological content of lower court opinions in a conflict case impacts the Supreme Court’s certiorari decisions in a statistically significant way, and thus …

Strategy And Tactics In Nfib V. Sebelius, Tonja Jacobi

Tonja Jacobi

This Article provides an in depth examination of the strategic judicial maneuvering witnessed in the Supreme Court’s healthcare decision. Through that lens, it is possible to gain a detailed understanding of the doctrinal groundwork that Chief Justice Roberts was laying for future conservative revolutions in the Commerce Clause Power, the Necessary and Proper Clause, and the Taxing and Spending Power. The reason Roberts was able to dramatically read down Congress’s main avenues of regulatory power was not despite the liberal outcome of the case, but because of it. Roberts’s strategic sacrifice in NFIB v. Sebelius suggests an obvious analogy to …

Disparate Protections For American Human Trafficking Victims, Amanda J. Peters

Amanda J Peters

The United States enacted the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) in 2000. It was the first piece of legislation to address human trafficking. Since that time, the United States has monitored anti-trafficking efforts worldwide. Nations that fail to meet minimum standards set by the United States risk losing non-humanitarian financial aid from the federal government, the International Monetary Fund, and global banks. Yet, these minimum standards are not met by the United States when it comes to protecting American trafficking victims.

According to the TVPA, governments shall attempt to prevent human trafficking, punish traffickers, and protect people who have been …

The United States And Iran – Decades Of Animosity: An Analysis Of The Historical And Present Conflicts., Patrick A. Mcdade

Patrick A. McDade

Lost in the international debate raging around Iran’s burgeoning nuclear weapon’s program is the deep and complex history that exists between the United States and Iran, as well as the legal rights and responsibilities that exist between the two nations. A thorough examination of the intensely adversarial relationship that has developed over the past sixty years must be undertaken before any path to a diplomatic solution is likely to succeed. The historical evidence clearly shows that Iran’s animosity towards and distrust of the United States is entirely justified, and the United States’ mistrust of Iran is equally well-grounded. Due these …

State Constitutional Prohibitions On Special Laws, Justin R. Long

Justin R Long

Since the nineteenth century, most states have had constitutional clauses prohibiting “special laws.” These clauses were ratified to protect the people of each state from domination by narrow economic elites, who would use their economic power to win grants of privilege from the state legislatures. To fight the corrupt favors garnered by private interests in this way, state constitutional drafters wrote clauses requiring their legislatures to pass only “general” laws that would apply equally to all members of the regulated class. For a brief period, these clauses were enforced in the courts—but more to protect economic elites than the democratic …

Litigation-Fostered Bureaucratic Autonomy: Administrative Law Against Political Control, Daniel E. Walters

Daniel E Walters

The idea of political control dominates our understanding of both what administrative law does and what it should do. This emphasis on political control, however, downplays the important ways that administrative law facilitates resistance to political control in administrative agencies. In this article, I offer studies of two instances where agencies harnessed the power of seemingly standard administrative law litigation to resist the imposition of policies by political leadership. I classify these kinds of modes of resistance as instances of “litigation-fostered bureaucratic autonomy” and flesh out the mechanisms that drive the process. Acknowledging the role of such modes of resistance …

The Unity Thesis: How Positivism Distorts Constitutional Argument, John Lunstroth

John Lunstroth

Democracy and civil rights are distorted and polarizing ideas that pit the rich against the poor, and should be abandoned in favor of an emphasis on the common good. To reach that conclusion I argue the US Constitution is and has always been designed to protect the wealth of the ruling class. All political associations or states have this as a central idea. My argument rests on a unique jurisprudential principle, the Unity Thesis. The main school of legal theory, positivism (the science of law) is based on the idea law is always separate from morals. I argue the opposite, …

Building A Better America: Tax Expenditure Reform And The Case Of State And Local Government Bonds And Build America Bonds, Blaine G. Saito

Blaine G. Saito

Currently most subnational government borrowing in the United States is done via tax-exempt muni bonds. But they are riddled with problems. They are inefficient at delivering the subsidy, and they create economic distortions of investment choices. They are inequitable, and they have significant democratic deficiencies. Direct payment Build America Bonds (BABs) provide an alternative, as they directly pay a cash subsidy to a subnational government. While there are simple technical problems that can easily be remedied, BABs face significant political hurdles that will prevent the permanence of the program. Policy entrepreneurship is a way forward. The piece also discusses how …

Would Jesus Kill Hitler? Bonhoeffer, Church, And State, Kenneth K. Ching

Kenneth K Ching

“Would Jesus kill Hitler?” is a symbolic question about the relationship between church and state. Jesus did not have occasion to answer. But Dietrich Bonhoeffer did. Bonhoeffer was a pastor, theologian, and philosopher who tried to “live the life of Jesus” while conspiring to assassinate Hitler.

This will be the first law journal article to take Bonhoeffer as its primary subject. The article summarizes a long tradition of Christian political theory, the natural law/two kingdoms (“NL2K”) theory, running through St. Augustine, William of Ockham, Martin Luther, John Calvin and many others. Some argue that Bonhoeffer rejected NL2K thought. This article’s …

Presidential Inaction And The Separation Of Powers, Jeffrey Love, Arpit Garg

Jeffrey Love

James Madison famously articulated a functional account of our governmental structure; he and his Federalist brethren created overlapping authority to prevent any single branch of government from acting unilaterally to dictate policy for the nation as a whole. And for more than two hundred years, the focus has been on just that: action. But the Framers and their intellectual heirs have failed to update their story to account for the government we have. In the modern administrative state, the President’s refusal to enforce duly enacted statutes—what we call “presidential inaction”—will often dictate national policy and yet will receive virtually none …

A Right To Speak And Spend: Citizens United And Its Consequences For Objective Journalism, Michael Ellement

Michael Ellement

• Article puts forth two concerns for the future of journalism following the Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. F.E.C. First, Citizens United blurred the line as to what the "press" is. Prior to Citizens United, press entities were traditionally exempt from campaign finance regulations because of their status as non-partisan information sources. This gave the press a unique status to participate in political process not enjoyed by other groups. Such a distinction has been eviscerated by Citizens United. All corporations now have the equal right to disseminate unlimited amounts of advocacy for a candidate or political position. Second, …

Would Jesus Kill Hitler? Bonhoeffer, Church, And State, Kenneth K. Ching

Kenneth K Ching

“Would Jesus kill Hitler?” is a symbolic question about the relationship between church and state. Jesus did not have occasion to answer. But Dietrich Bonhoeffer did. Bonhoeffer was a pastor, theologian, and philosopher who tried to “live the life of Jesus” while conspiring to assassinate Hitler.

This will be the first law journal article to take Bonhoeffer as its primary subject. The article summarizes a long tradition of Christian political theory, the natural law/two kingdoms (“NL2K”) theory, running through St. Augustine, William of Ockham, Martin Luther, John Calvin and many others. Some argue that Bonhoeffer rejected NL2K thought. This article’s …

Regulating From Typewriters In An Internet Age: The Development & Regulation Of Mass Media Usage In Presidential Campaigns, Anthony J. King

Anthony J. King

The American election process has become a misleading process of campaign promises and self-promotion, thus diluting its primary and most fundamental purpose. This discrepancy can be traced to three primary groups; (1) the candidates, who supplied the motive; (2) the mass media, who supplied the means; and (3) the electorate, who so far have allowed it to happen. Seeking to remedy the situation lawmakers have turned to regulations of the media in attempt to assure fairness and nurture the marketplace of ideas. These numerous attempts at fairness have been met with a mixed reception and mixed results leading to questions …

Would Jesus Kill Hitler? Bonhoeffer, Church, And State, Kenneth K. Ching

Kenneth K Ching

“Would Jesus kill Hitler?” is a symbolic question about the relationship between church and state. Jesus did not have occasion to answer. But Dietrich Bonhoeffer did. Bonhoeffer was a pastor, theologian, and philosopher who tried to “live the life of Jesus” while conspiring to assassinate Hitler.

This will be the first law journal article to take Bonhoeffer as its primary subject. The article summarizes a long tradition of Christian political theory, the natural law/two kingdoms (“NL2K”) theory, running through St. Augustine, William of Ockham, Martin Luther, John Calvin and many others. Some argue that Bonhoeffer rejected NL2K thought. This article’s …