Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 8 of 8

Full-Text Articles in Law

“Exporting U.S. Anti-Terrorism Legislation And Policies To The International Law Arena, A Comparative Study: The Effect On Other Countries' Legal Systems”, Olga Kallergi Mar 2007

“Exporting U.S. Anti-Terrorism Legislation And Policies To The International Law Arena, A Comparative Study: The Effect On Other Countries' Legal Systems”, Olga Kallergi

Olga Kallergi

Abstract

The terrorist attack on the World Trade Center in New York on 9/11 set in motion a new era all over the world: an era of a world uniting against a common enemy, but also an era of insecurity and fear. Laws have been changed worldwide, nations have united against a common threat, legal theories and belies of centuries have been questioned, and civil liberties have been replaced by a need for national safety. Has this worldwide effort worked? Is our world a better place not that we are all fighting the same enemy? Did we learn from our …


"Drug Treatment Courts In The 21st Century: Improving The Criminal Justice System's Response To Drug Offenses", Peggy Fulton Hora, Theodore Stalcup Mar 2007

"Drug Treatment Courts In The 21st Century: Improving The Criminal Justice System's Response To Drug Offenses", Peggy Fulton Hora, Theodore Stalcup

Peggy Hora

The article demonstrates that the traditional criminal justice system’s response to drug offenses – arrest, trial and incarceration and re-arrest, re-trial and re-incarceration of 70% of offenders within three years – wastes vast economic and human resources. Drug treatment courts, on the other hand, have proven to be strong alternatives to incarceration as well as effective mechanisms for dealing with America’s drug problem. The article addresses criticism of drug treatment courts, including resistance to the disease model of addiction, disputes over efficacy of treatment, legal issues related to purported coercion of treatment, concern over unbridled judicial discretion and ethical issues …


Do Rules Of Evidence Apply (Only) In The Courtroom? Deceptive Interrogations In The United States And Germany, Jacqueline E. Ross Mar 2007

Do Rules Of Evidence Apply (Only) In The Courtroom? Deceptive Interrogations In The United States And Germany, Jacqueline E. Ross

Jacqueline E Ross

Scholars who compare common law and civil law countries have long argued that civil law legal systems like Germany do not employ formal rules of evidence comparable to those which govern American courtrooms. The complex and restrictive nature of American evidentiary rules is said to be an artifact of the adversarial process and lay juries, which the legal system does not trust to evaluate evidence dispassionately. Civil law systems that commit fact-finding to mixed panels of lay and professional judges are said to have less need for formal rules of evidence that withhold information from decision-makers.

My essay challenges this …


Deciding Death, Corinna Lain Mar 2007

Deciding Death, Corinna Lain

Corinna Lain

When the Supreme Court decides death, how much does law matter? Scholars long have lamented the majoritarian nature of the Court’s Eighth Amendment “evolving standards of decency” doctrine, but a close look at the Court’s decisions in this area shows that their criticism misses the mark. Doctrine does not matter one whit in the Supreme Court’s “evolving standards” cases, but where majoritarian doctrine does not constrain the Court’s decision-making, other majoritarian forces do. To make this point, I first examine three of the Supreme Court’s most prominent (and in two cases, most recent) “evolving standards” decisions, along with the decisions …


Blowing The Whistle On Whistleblower Protection: A Tale Of Reform Versus Power, Mary K. Ramirez Mar 2007

Blowing The Whistle On Whistleblower Protection: A Tale Of Reform Versus Power, Mary K. Ramirez

mary k ramirez

Abstract: Blowing the Whistle on Whistleblower Protection: A Tale of Reform Versus Power, by Mary Kreiner Ramirez Congress is currently considering expanding whistleblower protection, which the President has vowed to veto. With every wave of scandals or with each new political movement, Congress seems to include whistleblower protection. Yet, this article shows that after nearly 150 years of piecemeal evolution, whistleblowing remains fraught with risk. The protections extended to whistleblowers are a porous net rather than a secure blanket. Indeed, one should only enter these dangerous waters with the advice of counsel. The recent extension by Congress of whistleblower protection …


Assessing The Legality Of Counterterrorism Measures Without Characterizing Them As Law Enforcement Or Military Action, Gregory E. Maggs Mar 2007

Assessing The Legality Of Counterterrorism Measures Without Characterizing Them As Law Enforcement Or Military Action, Gregory E. Maggs

Gregory E. Maggs

My Article is called: “Assessing the Legality of Counterterrorism Measures without Characterizing them as Law Enforcement or Military Action.” In this article, I develop three theses:

First, I claim that disagreements about the legality of counterterrorism measures commonly stem from disagreements about whether to characterize the measures as law enforcement efforts or as military actions. Observers who see the measures as methods of controlling crime assess their lawfulness differently from those who see them as a form of warfare against terrorists because criminal law enforcement rules differ substantially from the laws of war. With many specific examples, I show that …


Entrapment And Terrorism, Dru Stevenson Mar 2007

Entrapment And Terrorism, Dru Stevenson

Dru Stevenson

The thesis of this article is that the unique nature of terrorist crime requires a tweaking of the entrapment rules. The entrapment defense is our legal system’s primary mechanism for regulating government sting operations. I argue that sting operations and surveillance are conceptually distinct (or rival) methods of law enforcement, which compete for resource allocation. If an enforcement agency favors one method, it shifts resources away from the other. To the extent that we dislike panoptic government surveillance, we can steer enforcement agencies away from it by encouraging targeted stings; and we can achieve this, in part, by adapting the …


Private Criminal Justice, Ric Simmons Mar 2007

Private Criminal Justice, Ric Simmons

Ric Simmons

The past few decades have seen the rise of two very different alternatives to the traditional criminal justice system: private police and restorative justice programs. Each of these approaches represents a revolutionary paradigm shift as to how criminal justice is administered in this country—and yet each of these movements has been limited in its impact on the current criminal justice system. The privatization movement has been restricted to the law enforcement stage of the criminal justice system, while the restorative justice movement has been dependent upon state support. This Article argues that it is only a matter of time before …