Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law
Robert, Sebelius, And Constitution Day, Kent Greenfield
Robert, Sebelius, And Constitution Day, Kent Greenfield
Kent Greenfield
No abstract provided.
When The Cheering (For Gideon ) Stops: The Defense Bar And Representation At Initial Bail Hearings, Douglas Colbert
When The Cheering (For Gideon ) Stops: The Defense Bar And Representation At Initial Bail Hearings, Douglas Colbert
Douglas L. Colbert
This article suggests that the absence of representation at the beginning of a State criminal prosecution must come to a screeching halt. The criminal defense bar should take a leadership role and dedicate Gideon's anniversary to making certain that an accused's right to the effective assistance of counsel begins at the initial bail hearing. Indeed, guaranteeing vigorous representation should be the defense bar's number one priority.
Individual Mandate Is Constitutional, Leslie Henry, Maxwell Stearns
Individual Mandate Is Constitutional, Leslie Henry, Maxwell Stearns
Maxwell L. Stearns
Supreme Court should find that key aspect of Obama's signature law is a legitimate exercise of Commerce Clause power.
Individual Mandate Is Constitutional, Leslie Henry, Maxwell Stearns
Individual Mandate Is Constitutional, Leslie Henry, Maxwell Stearns
Leslie Meltzer Henry
Supreme Court should find that key aspect of Obama's signature law is a legitimate exercise of Commerce Clause power.
American Constitutionalism: Volume I: Structures Of Government, Howard Gillman, Mark Graber, Keith Whittington
American Constitutionalism: Volume I: Structures Of Government, Howard Gillman, Mark Graber, Keith Whittington
Mark Graber
Constitutionalism in the United States is not determined solely by decisions made by the Supreme Court. Moving beyond traditional casebooks, renowned scholars Howard Gillman, Mark A. Graber, and Keith E. Whittington take a refreshingly innovative approach in American Constitutionalism. Organized according to the standard two-semester sequence--in which Volume I covers institutions and Volume II covers Rights and Liberties-- this text is unique in that it presents the material in a historical organization within each volume, as opposed to the typical issues-based organization.
Decisional Minimalism And The Judicial Evaluation Of Gun Regulations, Richard Boldt
Decisional Minimalism And The Judicial Evaluation Of Gun Regulations, Richard Boldt
Richard C. Boldt
No abstract provided.
To Swear Or Not To Swear: Using Foul Language During A Supreme Court Oral Argument, Alan Garfield
To Swear Or Not To Swear: Using Foul Language During A Supreme Court Oral Argument, Alan Garfield
Alan E Garfield
This essay considers the provocative question of whether it is strategically wise for a lawyer to use foul language during a Supreme Court oral argument. This issue doesn’t come up often. But it does when a lawyer claims his client’s First Amendment rights were violated when the government punished him for using foul language. If the lawyer doesn’t use his client’s offensive words, he risks conceding that these words are so horrid they warrant suppression. But if he does use the words, he risks alienating justices who find the words unseemly. The essay uses the “fleeting expletives” case that was …