Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 4 of 4

Full-Text Articles in Law

The New Deportations Delirium (Editor), Daniel Kanstroom, M. Lykes Dec 2015

The New Deportations Delirium (Editor), Daniel Kanstroom, M. Lykes

Daniel Kanstroom

Since 1996, when the deportation laws were hardened, millions of migrants to the U.S., including many long-term legal permanent residents with “green cards,” have experienced summary arrest, incarceration without bail, transfer to remote detention facilities, and deportation without counsel—a life-time banishment from what is, in many cases, the only country they have ever known. U.S.-based families and communities face the loss of a worker, neighbor, spouse, parent, or child. Many of the deported are “sentenced home” to a country which they only knew as an infant, whose language they do not speak, or where a family lives in extreme poverty …


Response To Jacqueline Bhabha, Child Migration And Human Rights In A Global Age, Daniel Kanstroom Mar 2015

Response To Jacqueline Bhabha, Child Migration And Human Rights In A Global Age, Daniel Kanstroom

Daniel Kanstroom

No abstract provided.


Human Rights For All Is Better Than Citizenship Rights For Some, Daniel Kanstroom Dec 2014

Human Rights For All Is Better Than Citizenship Rights For Some, Daniel Kanstroom

Daniel Kanstroom

No abstract provided.


Executive Justice?, Daniel Kanstroom, Mae Ngai Dec 2014

Executive Justice?, Daniel Kanstroom, Mae Ngai

Daniel Kanstroom

The executive order on immigration that President Obama announced last November filled part of a void created by a Congress that has failed to pass much-needed comprehensive reform legislation. A rambling 123-page opinion (in a case appropriately named Texas v. U.S.A., written by a George W. Bush-appointed Texas federal judge), issued on February 16, ordered a temporary halt to the program on highly technical administrative law grounds. However, the president’s immediate response is absolutely right: both law and history are on the administration’s side.