Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Accident prevention (1)
- Aliens (Persons) (1)
- Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990; ADA; hiring and employment practices under Title I of ADA; effect of Title I of ADA on employer/employee relations in the workers' compensation context; preemployment inquiries; protected status of employees injured on job; (1)
- Apportionment of liability (1)
- Ballweg v. Crowder Contracting (1)
-
- Benefit adequacy (1)
- Disability management (1)
- Employer behavior (1)
- Employer retaliation against workers' compensation claimants; legislative remedy for wrongful discharge; Act 796; evolution of judicial remedy for wrongful discharge; feasibility of tort remedy for wrongful discharge; problems of proof in retaliatory discharge claims (1)
- Employment Division Department of Human Resources v. Smith (1)
- Equal rights (1)
- Frazee v. Illinois Employment Security Department (1)
- Government policy (1)
- Hobbie v. Unemployment Appeals Commission (1)
- Impediment and Its Foundation (1)
- Indemnification (1)
- Kansas (1)
- Michigan Court of Appeals (1)
- Minersville School District v. Gobitis (1)
- Negligence (1)
- Occupational safety (1)
- Requirement of Explicit Reference Impediment (1)
- Restatement (Second) of Contracts (1)
- Reynolds v. United States (1)
- Safety intervention (1)
- Sherbert v. Verner (1)
- Thomas v. Review Board (1)
- UNEMPLOYMENT, DISABILITY, and INCOME SUPPORT PROGRAMS (1)
- Unenforceable on Grounds of Public Policy Impediment (1)
- United States v. Lee (1)
Articles 1 - 10 of 10
Full-Text Articles in Law
Change In Condition And New Accident: The Difference Between The Two, Elements Of Each, And Burdens Of Proof, Michael F. Antonowich
Change In Condition And New Accident: The Difference Between The Two, Elements Of Each, And Burdens Of Proof, Michael F. Antonowich
Mercer Law Review
This Article is designed as a survey of the law on the theories of new accident and change in condition. It will compare and contrast these two theories, which compromise one of the most often litigated areas of workers' compensation law. The respective burdens of proof are placed on the employee/claimant and the employer/insurer when either alleges a change in condition, either for the better or for the worse. These burdens are addressed both as to accidents occurring before and after July 1, 1992. Also addressed are the circumstances and attendant outcomes when more than one employer or insurance company …
Workers' Compensation, H. Michael Bagley, Daniel C. Kniffen, John G. Blackmon Jr.
Workers' Compensation, H. Michael Bagley, Daniel C. Kniffen, John G. Blackmon Jr.
Mercer Law Review
After the difficult debate surrounding workers' compensation legislation in 1992, few would have thought it possible that the Georgia Legislature would revisit the Workers' Compensation Act (the "Act")' any time soon. Yet, the 1994 General Assembly made a number of substantial changes to the Act, constituting by far the most significant development in workers' compensation law over the survey period. Important case law decisions affected the areas of exclusive remedy, the employment relationship, and heart attack claims.
New Hope For Workers' Compensation Programs, H. Allan Hunt, Rochelle Virginia Habeck
New Hope For Workers' Compensation Programs, H. Allan Hunt, Rochelle Virginia Habeck
Employment Research Newsletter
No abstract provided.
Go Home Stranger: An Analysis Of Unequal Workers' Compensation Death Benefits To Nonresident Alien Beneficiaries, Adam S. Hersh
Go Home Stranger: An Analysis Of Unequal Workers' Compensation Death Benefits To Nonresident Alien Beneficiaries, Adam S. Hersh
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Collapsing The Legal Impediments To Indemnification, Clark C. Johnson
Collapsing The Legal Impediments To Indemnification, Clark C. Johnson
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Impact Of Title I Of The Americans With Disabilities Act Of 1990 On Workers' Compensation Law, Ranko Shiraki Oliver
The Impact Of Title I Of The Americans With Disabilities Act Of 1990 On Workers' Compensation Law, Ranko Shiraki Oliver
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Arkansas Remedy For Employer Retaliation Against Workers' Compensation Claimants, J. Thomas Sullivan
The Arkansas Remedy For Employer Retaliation Against Workers' Compensation Claimants, J. Thomas Sullivan
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Sullivan V. Scoular Grain Co.: Apportioning The Fault Of Immune Employers, Dale T. Hansen
Sullivan V. Scoular Grain Co.: Apportioning The Fault Of Immune Employers, Dale T. Hansen
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Jurado V. Popejoy Construction Co.: Determining The Constitutionality Of Disparate Awards Of Workers' Compensation Death Benefits To Nonresident Alien Dependents, Mary K. Shannon
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
Partially Disabled And Religious: Virginia Workers' Compensation And The Free Exercise Clause, Brydon Dewitt
Partially Disabled And Religious: Virginia Workers' Compensation And The Free Exercise Clause, Brydon Dewitt
University of Richmond Law Review
The Virginia Workers' Compensation Act denies wage loss benefits to partially disabled employees who unjustifiably reject employment procured by their employer which is within their remaining work capacity. Section 65.2-510 of the Virginia Code provides that "[i]f an injured employee refuses employment procured for him suitable to his capacity, he shall only be entitled to the benefits provided for in section 65.2-603 during the continuance of such refusal, unless in the opinion of the Commission such refusal was justified." Essentially, unjustified refusal of selective employment within the employee's work capacity results in a suspension in wage loss benefits until the …