Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 11 of 11

Full-Text Articles in Law

Abstracts Of Recent Cases, T. E. P. Dec 1956

Abstracts Of Recent Cases, T. E. P.

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.


Workmen's Compensation—Chairman's Authority—Minimum Fees For Medical Care, Vincent P. Furlong Oct 1956

Workmen's Compensation—Chairman's Authority—Minimum Fees For Medical Care, Vincent P. Furlong

Buffalo Law Review

Brooklyn Hospital v. Donlon, 309 N. Y. 520, 132 N. E. 2d 489 (1956).


Workmen's Compensation—Test For Occupational Disease, Vincent P. Furlong Oct 1956

Workmen's Compensation—Test For Occupational Disease, Vincent P. Furlong

Buffalo Law Review

Dettenbeck v. General Motors, 309 N. Y. 558, 132 N. E. 2d 840 (1956).


Labor Law And Workmen's Compensation -- 1956 Tennessee Survey, Paul H. Sanders, James G. Bowman, Jr. Aug 1956

Labor Law And Workmen's Compensation -- 1956 Tennessee Survey, Paul H. Sanders, James G. Bowman, Jr.

Vanderbilt Law Review

Labor Law

Inducing Breach of Contract: Howard v. Haven' was the only case during the survey period which presented a legal problem relating to the activities of a labor organization. In this case an electrical contractor sought an injunction and damages because of the acts of a local labor union, its business agent, and other named defendants in preventing the plaintiff from carrying out a hospital construction contract. On the trial of the case the determinative issue became whether or not the defendants brought about a breach of the contract which the complainant claimed to have had with the general …


Workman's Compensation, Clarence Shuh Jun 1956

Workman's Compensation, Clarence Shuh

Washington Law Review

Covers cases on causation in heart cases.


Labor Law - Lmra - Deduction Of Workmen's Compensation From Employer's Back Pay Liability, John A. Beach May 1956

Labor Law - Lmra - Deduction Of Workmen's Compensation From Employer's Back Pay Liability, John A. Beach

Michigan Law Review

The National Labor Relations Board found that the Moss Planing Mill Company had committed an unfair labor practice in discharging an employee for his union activities. The company's secretary-treasurer also had battered the employee, inflicting injury, at the time of the discharge. Pursuant to section 10 (c) of the amended National Labor Relations Act, the Board ordered the company to reinstate the employee and make him whole for back pay lost due to the unfair discharge. The order was enforced by the court of appeals. In a supplemental order specifying the amount of back pay to be awarded, the Board …


Workmen’S Compensation: Bar To An Action In Deceit, Vincent Furlong Apr 1956

Workmen’S Compensation: Bar To An Action In Deceit, Vincent Furlong

Buffalo Law Review

Greenwalt v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., __ O. S. __ , 128 N. E. 2d 116 (1955).


Proposed Procedure For Administering Heart Cases Under The Washington Industrial Insurance Act, Ivan C. Rutledge Mar 1956

Proposed Procedure For Administering Heart Cases Under The Washington Industrial Insurance Act, Ivan C. Rutledge

Washington Law Review

Recent and authoritative medical investigations have convinced qualified cardiologists that the great majority of cardiac patients can perform productive labor without physical harm to themselves. Despite the assurance of cardiologists, many industrial concerns are reluctant to employ workmen suffering from cardiac disorders due to fear of increased industrial insurance costs. The resultant nonemployment of these patients when otherwise employable not only creates needless despair for themselves and their families, but it deprives the industrial community of many skills developed over long years of training. It is the purpose of this article to review the Washington Industrial Insurance Act to determine …


Conflict Of Laws - Full Faith And Credit - Exclusive-Remedy Provision Of Foreign Workmen's Compensation Law, Morton A. Polster S.Ed. Feb 1956

Conflict Of Laws - Full Faith And Credit - Exclusive-Remedy Provision Of Foreign Workmen's Compensation Law, Morton A. Polster S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff, a resident of Missouri, entered into an employment contract there with a Missouri painting company. He was injured while working in Arkansas on a job his employer had subcontracted from the defendant, a Louisiana contractor. The Missouri employer's insurer voluntarily began weekly payments to the plaintiff pursuant to the Missouri workmen's compensation law, although there had been no formal proceeding or award. Payments under the Missouri act were exclusive of all other rights and remedies. After receiving thirty-four payments, the plaintiff sued the defendant for negligence in the Arkansas courts. The defendant had the case removed to the federal …


Industrial Noise Causing Acoustic Trauma, Heinz Gasser Jan 1956

Industrial Noise Causing Acoustic Trauma, Heinz Gasser

Cleveland State Law Review

Is acoustic trauma an accident, and do the Workmen's Compensation Statutes thus save the employer from being sued in Common Law? Or is it considered an occupational disease, and thus not within the Acts?


Workmen's Compensation - Injury Suffered During Coffee Break As Arising Out Of And In The Course Of Employment, Hazen V. Hatch S.Ed. Jan 1956

Workmen's Compensation - Injury Suffered During Coffee Break As Arising Out Of And In The Course Of Employment, Hazen V. Hatch S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff was employed by defendant laundry company as a mangle operator. A collective bargaining agreement between the defendant and the union representing its employees provided for two paid ten minute rest periods during the work day. Plaintiff left the defendant's premises during such a rest period and went to a nearby restaurant. On her return she slipped on ice on defendant's front step and was injured." The Department of Labor and Industry found the injury compensable under the Michigan Workmen's Compensation Act. On appeal, held, reversed, two justices dissenting. The place of the injury is not determinative of eligibility …