Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (14)
- Cleveland State University (11)
- West Virginia University (4)
- University of Kentucky (3)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (3)
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (2)
- Marquette University Law School (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (1)
- Pepperdine University (1)
- Roger Williams University (1)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (1)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (1)
- University of Richmond (1)
- University of Washington School of Law (1)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Michigan Law Review (14)
- Cleveland State Law Review (10)
- West Virginia Law Review (4)
- Kentucky Law Journal (3)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (3)
-
- Touro Law Review (2)
- Catholic University Law Review (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- Journal of Health Care Law and Policy (1)
- Journal of Law and Health (1)
- Journal of Law and Practice (1)
- Marquette Law Review (1)
- Nevada Law Journal (1)
- Pepperdine Law Review (1)
- Roger Williams University Law Review (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (1)
- University of Richmond Law Review (1)
- Washington Law Review (1)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 49
Full-Text Articles in Law
Dextraze V. Bernard, 253 A.3d 411 (R.I. 2021), Angela Amaral
Dextraze V. Bernard, 253 A.3d 411 (R.I. 2021), Angela Amaral
Roger Williams University Law Review
No abstract provided.
The "Accident Network": A Network Theory Analysis Of Proximate Causation, Anat Lior
The "Accident Network": A Network Theory Analysis Of Proximate Causation, Anat Lior
Marquette Law Review
In torts, proximate causation, or legal cause, examines whether harmful negligent conduct is “closely enough related” to the damages that ensue. Torts professors often use the metaphor of a stone being thrown into a pond to explain this rather amorphous legal doctrine. The ripples the stone creates surrounding it are the direct result of the act of it being thrown. The stone tossed into the pond, i.e., a negligent act, created an effect which perpetuated via ripples to a long distance, forever changing the entire pond, i.e., causing close and far damages. Can all of those affected by the negligent …
Why Exempting Negligent Doctors May Reduce Suicide: An Empirical Analysis, John Shahar Dillbary, Griffin Edwards, Fredrick E. Vars
Why Exempting Negligent Doctors May Reduce Suicide: An Empirical Analysis, John Shahar Dillbary, Griffin Edwards, Fredrick E. Vars
Indiana Law Journal
This Article is the first to empirically analyze the impact of tort liability on suicide. Counter-intuitively, our analysis shows that suicide rates increase when potential tort liability is expanded to include psychiatrists—the very defendants who would seem best able to prevent suicide. Using a fifty-state panel regression for 1981 to 2013, we find that states which allowed psychiatrists (but not other doctors) to be liable for malpractice resulting in suicide experienced a 9.3% increase in suicides. On the other hand, and more intuitively, holding non-psychiatrist doctors liable de-creases suicide by 10.7%. These countervailing effects can be explained by psychiatrists facing …
Recovering Wagner V. International Railway Company, Kenneth S. Abraham, G. Edward White
Recovering Wagner V. International Railway Company, Kenneth S. Abraham, G. Edward White
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Palsgraf V. Long Island R.R.: Its Historical Context, William E. Nelson
Palsgraf V. Long Island R.R.: Its Historical Context, William E. Nelson
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Positive Externalities And The Economics Of Proximate Cause, Israel Gilead, Michael D. Green
Positive Externalities And The Economics Of Proximate Cause, Israel Gilead, Michael D. Green
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rape On The Washington Southern: The Tragic Case Of Hines V. Garrett, Michael I. Krauss
Rape On The Washington Southern: The Tragic Case Of Hines V. Garrett, Michael I. Krauss
Catholic University Law Review
In 1919, Ms. Julia May Garret, a young Virginian woman, was brutally raped by two different men as she was walking home after the Washington Southern Railway failed to stop at her designated station. What followed was a legal battle that created precedent still discussed in American casebooks today. Although most case law recognizes that the criminal acts of third parties severs liability because such conduct is considered unforeseeable, Hines v. Garrett held that the harm Ms. Garrett suffered was within the risk created by the railroad’s negligence, and as a common carrier, the railroad owed her a duty to …
Economic And Causation Issues In City Suits Against Gun Manufacturers , Frank J. Vandall
Economic And Causation Issues In City Suits Against Gun Manufacturers , Frank J. Vandall
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Proximate Cause In Civil Damages, Michael E. Steenson
Proximate Cause In Civil Damages, Michael E. Steenson
Journal of Law and Practice
No abstract provided.
Mixing Oil And Water: Reconciling The Substantial Factor And Result-Within-The-Risk Approaches To Proximate Cause, Peter Zablotsky
Mixing Oil And Water: Reconciling The Substantial Factor And Result-Within-The-Risk Approaches To Proximate Cause, Peter Zablotsky
Cleveland State Law Review
Most recently, however, the courts—the entities mandated to apply proximate cause during the course of the analysis of liability for negligence—appear to have brokered a peace between the dueling conceptualizations of proximate cause. As applied, the proximate cause analysis grounded in substantial factor appears to be yielding the same results with respect to liability as the proximate cause analysis grounded in foreseeability. It is the thesis of this Article that such a peace has, in fact, been brokered; whether approached from the means of substantial factor or result-within-the-risk, the end is the finding of common ground for the purpose of …
Proximate Cause In Constitutional Torts: Holding Interrogators Liable For Fifth Amendment Violations At Trial, Joel Flaxman
Proximate Cause In Constitutional Torts: Holding Interrogators Liable For Fifth Amendment Violations At Trial, Joel Flaxman
Michigan Law Review
This Note argues for the approach taken by the Sixth Circuit in McKinley: a proper understanding of the Fifth Amendment requires holding that an officer who coerces a confession that is used at trial to convict a defendant in violation of the right against self-incrimination should face liability for the harm of conviction and imprisonment. Part I examines how the Supreme Court and the circuits have applied the concept of common law proximate causation to constitutional torts and argues that lower courts are wrong to blindly adopt common law rules without reference to the constitutional rights at stake. It …
Against Genetic Exceptionalism: An Argument In Favor Of The Viability Of Preconception Genetic Torts, Daniel S. Goldberg
Against Genetic Exceptionalism: An Argument In Favor Of The Viability Of Preconception Genetic Torts, Daniel S. Goldberg
Journal of Health Care Law and Policy
No abstract provided.
Proximate Cause And The American Law Institute: The False Choice Between The "Direct-Consequences" Test And The "Risk Standard", Michael L. Wells
Proximate Cause And The American Law Institute: The False Choice Between The "Direct-Consequences" Test And The "Risk Standard", Michael L. Wells
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Insurance Causation Issues: The Legacy Of Bird V. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., Peter Nash Swisher
Insurance Causation Issues: The Legacy Of Bird V. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., Peter Nash Swisher
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Doctors, Nurses And Superseding Cause: The Demise Of The Last In Time Defense, Charles Lattanzi
Doctors, Nurses And Superseding Cause: The Demise Of The Last In Time Defense, Charles Lattanzi
Journal of Law and Health
The question which naturally arises is whether the determination of superseding cause in this context is a question for the jury. Ohio case law has long held, as a matter of law, that the aggravation of an injury by the subsequent malpractice of a physician never breaks the chain of causation. Assuming that the original tortfeaser was negligent and that his actions caused the original injury, the only question left for the jury is whether the plaintiff herself exercised reasonable care in seeking treatment by a qualified physician. This rule was affirmed and given its common appellation, "the subsequent tortfeasor …
Legal Malpractice In Ohio, John C. Nemeth
Legal Malpractice In Ohio, John C. Nemeth
Cleveland State Law Review
This article will discuss the fundamentals of a legal malpractice case, specifically addressing two areas. The first involves the elements of a legal malpractice case. This discussion will expose two problems that continually appear in legal malpractice litigation: (1) expanding the liability of an attorney to third parties, and (2) determining whether the alleged malpractice was the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries. The second area of discussion will focus on the time limitations imposed for bringing a legal malpractice action. Additionally, in order to better understand the current state of the law, a brief discussion illustrating the historical development …
Educational Malpractice: A Tort Is Born, Johnny C. Parker
Educational Malpractice: A Tort Is Born, Johnny C. Parker
Cleveland State Law Review
This article examines the judicial justification for the nonrecognition of educational malpractice as a theory of tort liability. Section I focuses on the various factual contexts in which educational malpractice claims have arisen and analyzes the concept of duty and proximate cause in the different factual contexts. Section II discusses the common law principles which demonstrate that the analytical problems associated with educational malpractice are not new to the law. Section III examines public policy as a distinct component of the duty-proximate cause inquiry. Section IV also focuses on public policy as expressed by various state legislatures regarding the teaching …
Educational Malpractice: A Tort En Ventre, Frank D. Aquila
Educational Malpractice: A Tort En Ventre, Frank D. Aquila
Cleveland State Law Review
This article explores the policy reasons which courts have adopted to deny a private cause of action holding educators legally liable for deficiencies in a student's education. The introductory section provides the background on the basic issue of malpractice in education. Section two examines educational malpractice case law focusing first on cases involving negligence in basic academic skill instruction, then looking at negligence in special education. Section three explores the various duty of care arguments while section four discusses three alternate theories for recovery. Section five analyzes the policy reasons for denial of the tort of educational malpractice. New directions …
Educational Malpractice: A Tort En Ventre, Frank D. Aquila
Educational Malpractice: A Tort En Ventre, Frank D. Aquila
Cleveland State Law Review
This article explores the policy reasons which courts have adopted to deny a private cause of action holding educators legally liable for deficiencies in a student's education. The introductory section provides the background on the basic issue of malpractice in education. Section two examines educational malpractice case law focusing first on cases involving negligence in basic academic skill instruction, then looking at negligence in special education. Section three explores the various duty of care arguments while section four discusses three alternate theories for recovery. Section five analyzes the policy reasons for denial of the tort of educational malpractice. New directions …
Educational Malpractice: A Tort Is Born, Johnny C. Parker
Educational Malpractice: A Tort Is Born, Johnny C. Parker
Cleveland State Law Review
This article examines the judicial justification for the nonrecognition of educational malpractice as a theory of tort liability. Section I focuses on the various factual contexts in which educational malpractice claims have arisen and analyzes the concept of duty and proximate cause in the different factual contexts. Section II discusses the common law principles which demonstrate that the analytical problems associated with educational malpractice are not new to the law. Section III examines public policy as a distinct component of the duty-proximate cause inquiry. Section IV also focuses on public policy as expressed by various state legislatures regarding the teaching …
Who Decides - Community Safety Conventions At The Heart Of Tort Liability, Patrick J. Kelley
Who Decides - Community Safety Conventions At The Heart Of Tort Liability, Patrick J. Kelley
Cleveland State Law Review
What we need is a uniformly accepted theory that explains the tort liability system in terms of its ultimate social function. The reason we don't have one, I will argue, is that our understanding of the tort liability system has been skewed by an earlier, flawed attempt at descriptive theory. Before embarking on a new search for a descriptive theory, we first ought to formulate a search plan, sometimes called, forbiddingly, a "theoretical methodology." Using John Finnis's social science methodology, we can identify the two halves of the focal case of tort liability: intentional battery and negligent infliction of personal …
Expert Testimony On Proximate Cause, Daniel J. Steinbeck, William M. Richman, Douglas E. Ray
Expert Testimony On Proximate Cause, Daniel J. Steinbeck, William M. Richman, Douglas E. Ray
Vanderbilt Law Review
Expert testimony is common in tort litigation, especially on issues of standard of care and cause-in-fact. Rule 704 of the Federal Rules of Evidence and its state counterparts abolished the prohibition of testimony on ultimate issues, leading to the possibility of expert testimony on the often crucial issue of proximate cause. The situation is easy to imagine. After counsel has qualified an expert witness and elicited an opinion that the particular act or omission "caused" the injury in question, counsel might very well be tempted to inquire whether the witness has an opinion as to whether the act or omission …
Medico-Legal Issues In Wound Management, Susan Webber
Medico-Legal Issues In Wound Management, Susan Webber
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Civil Liability For Causing Suicide: A Synthesis Of Law And Psychiatry, Victor E. Schwartz
Civil Liability For Causing Suicide: A Synthesis Of Law And Psychiatry, Victor E. Schwartz
Vanderbilt Law Review
If suicide is a deliberate, intentional act by an individual, how can one person be "civilly liable for causing the suicide of another"? The paradox suggested by this question has caused many courts to shy away from imposing civil liability for causing suicide.' In certain situations,however, a growing number of courts are permitting recovery. Since suicide is on the increase both in numerical terms and in rank as a cause of death in the United States it can be expected that even more tort claims will be brought by parties attempting to fix civil responsibility on someone other than their …
Ill Treatment As The Cause Of Suicide, William Weaver
Ill Treatment As The Cause Of Suicide, William Weaver
Cleveland State Law Review
This paper attempts to summarize the law with respect to the liability of one whose ill treatment of another ultimately results in the suicidal death of such other.
Foreseeability In American And English Law, Harry G. Fuerst
Foreseeability In American And English Law, Harry G. Fuerst
Cleveland State Law Review
Foreseeability is "the ability to see or know in advance, hence, the reasonable anticipation that harm or injury is the likely result of acts or omissions." In order to determine culpable negligence and establish the right to recover for a wrong, there must be a sequence of events like concatenation, or a series of united events like the links of a chain, called proximate cause. The definition of proximate cause is, "that cause which in natural and continuous sequence, unbroken by any efficient intervening cause, produces the injury, and without which the result would not have occurred."
Contibutory Negligence In Medical Malpractice, W. David Alderson
Contibutory Negligence In Medical Malpractice, W. David Alderson
Cleveland State Law Review
Three categories of cases have been noted out of the mass of factually individualistic ones concerning medical malpractice and contributory negligence. The first, where a breach of duty owed the patient by the physician is lacking, involves an injury produced by the patient's own negligence. In the second, the patient's negligence directly contributes to the severity of an injury already present because of the physician's negligence. The plaintiff-patient's damages are not mitigated but rather entirely precluded in light of his acts. Thus a plea of contributory negligence is a complete defense. The third category includes those cases where a time …
Torts--A New Test For Proximate Cause?, Robert William Burk Jr.
Torts--A New Test For Proximate Cause?, Robert William Burk Jr.
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Concurrent Causation In Insurance Contracts, William Conant Brewer Jr.
Concurrent Causation In Insurance Contracts, William Conant Brewer Jr.
Michigan Law Review
A great deal of work and thought has been devoted to concurrent causation problems in the field of torts. Less attention has been paid to the insurance cases, and no serious effort has been made to formulate the separate rules applicable to them. It is the thesis of this article that concurrent causation problems which arise under an insurance contract must be handled somewhat differently from those which arise in connection with tort litigation, and that the tendency to borrow rules of law from the larger tort field and apply them to the smaller volume of insurance cases can only …
Torts -- 1960 Tennessee Survey, John W. Wade
Torts -- 1960 Tennessee Survey, John W. Wade
Vanderbilt Law Review
As usual, there were about forty reported Torts cases this year. There were no striking new developments. Many of the cases were merely routine, some of them indeed carrying quite long opinions without deciding anything which will give them real value as precedents for the future. The great majority of the cases involved actions for negligence, considerably more than half the cases being concerned with traffic accidents.