Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Vanderbilt University Law School (11)
- UIC School of Law (8)
- West Virginia University (7)
- St. Mary's University (6)
- Florida State University College of Law (5)
-
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (5)
- Brigham Young University Law School (4)
- Duquesne University (4)
- University of Richmond (4)
- University of Washington School of Law (4)
- Cleveland State University (3)
- University of Michigan Law School (3)
- Seattle University School of Law (2)
- University of Kentucky (2)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (2)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Mercer University School of Law (1)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (1)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Comparative negligence (7)
- Negligence (6)
- Strict liability (5)
- Product liability (4)
- Liability (3)
-
- Products liability (3)
- Torts (3)
- Comparative fault (2)
- Contributory negligence (2)
- Damages (2)
- Legislation (2)
- Non-manufacturing seller (2)
- Product liability insurance (2)
- Sovereign immunity (2)
- State of the art (2)
- Statute of limitations (2)
- Tort claims (2)
- Tort law (2)
- Washington (2)
- West Virginia (2)
- 348 So. 2d 303 (1)
- 768.01 (1)
- 768.03 (1)
- 768.28 (1)
- Absolute Liability (1)
- Accidents (1)
- Accurate medical information (1)
- Advertising (1)
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Price (1)
- Alaska Airlines Inc. v. Sweat (1)
- Publication
-
- Vanderbilt Law Review (10)
- UIC Law Review (8)
- West Virginia Law Review (7)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (6)
- Florida State University Law Review (5)
-
- Washington and Lee Law Review (5)
- BYU Law Review (4)
- Duquesne Law Review (4)
- University of Richmond Law Review (4)
- Washington Law Review (4)
- Cleveland State Law Review (3)
- Kentucky Law Journal (2)
- Seattle University Law Review (2)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (2)
- Buffalo Law Review (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- Loyola University Chicago Law Journal (1)
- Maryland Journal of International Law (1)
- Maryland Law Review (1)
- Mercer Law Review (1)
- Michigan Law Review (1)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (1)
- Villanova Law Review (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 75
Full-Text Articles in Law
Defamation And The First Amendment: Protecting Speech On Public Issues, Bruce J. Borrus
Defamation And The First Amendment: Protecting Speech On Public Issues, Bruce J. Borrus
Washington Law Review
The common law of defamation collided with the United States Constitution in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, and aftershocks from that collision have been rumbling for sixteen years. Ever since the New York Times Court asserted that the first and fourteenth amendments impose restraints on a state's power to afford a civil remedy for wrongful injury to reputation, the Supreme Court has been torn between its concern for personal reputation and its competing concern for free expression. The difficulty of resolving the conflict between these two concerns has forced the Court to decide a long line of cases …
Defamation And The First Amendment: Protecting Speech On Public Issues, Bruce J. Borrus
Defamation And The First Amendment: Protecting Speech On Public Issues, Bruce J. Borrus
Washington Law Review
The common law of defamation collided with the United States Constitution in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, and aftershocks from that collision have been rumbling for sixteen years. Ever since the New York Times Court asserted that the first and fourteenth amendments impose restraints on a state's power to afford a civil remedy for wrongful injury to reputation, the Supreme Court has been torn between its concern for personal reputation and its competing concern for free expression. The difficulty of resolving the conflict between these two concerns has forced the Court to decide a long line of cases in …
Lex Loci Delicti And Dissimilarity Doctrine Abandoned And Most Significant Relationship Test Adopted., Patrick B. Tobin
Lex Loci Delicti And Dissimilarity Doctrine Abandoned And Most Significant Relationship Test Adopted., Patrick B. Tobin
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Torts, Jerry B. Blackstock, Steven B. Licata
Torts, Jerry B. Blackstock, Steven B. Licata
Mercer Law Review
This article seeks to point out, examine, and comment on the significant developments in Georgia tort law during the period from June 1979 through May 1980. Of course, with over 300 appellate cases decided in this area during one year, every case is not included, and we have endeavored to exercise our best judgment to include only the cases of significance to the practitioner.
Survey Of Developments In West Virginia Law: 1980
Survey Of Developments In West Virginia Law: 1980
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Encouraging Safety: The Limits Of Tort Law And Government Regulation, Richard J. Pierce, Jr.
Encouraging Safety: The Limits Of Tort Law And Government Regulation, Richard J. Pierce, Jr.
Vanderbilt Law Review
Society wants more expenditures to reduce the risks of injury,illness, and premature death associated with many activities, but simultaneously it wants the fruits of those activities to continue to be available at a low cost. To some extent, these goals are inherently in conflict. On occasion society may give vitality to the slogan that human life has an infinite value, but it can do so only in narrow contexts and for brief periods. More often, artful self-deception is practiced to create the appearance of adhering to an impossible, but widely held, ideal, while in actuality lives are balanced against dollars. …
Toxic Substance Contamination: The Risk-Benefit Approach To Causation Analysis, Bradford W. Kuster
Toxic Substance Contamination: The Risk-Benefit Approach To Causation Analysis, Bradford W. Kuster
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
This article argues that the dilemma described above requires change and proposes a new standard for causation in this type of toxic contamination case. Part I examines the difficulties posed by conventional common law relief mechanisms, and the inadequacies of existing statutory relief mechanisms. Part II scrutinizes a more lenient burden of proof standard, the risk-benefit approach, which some courts have applied when faced with situations involving scientific uncertainties. The risk-benefit approach will be applied to causation analysis in the context of damage recoveries, using the. Hemlock, Michigan, situation as a case study. Part III discusses present congressional proposals, and …
The Involuntary Public Figure Class Of Gertz V. Robert Welch: Dead Or Merely Dormant?, Dale K. Nichols
The Involuntary Public Figure Class Of Gertz V. Robert Welch: Dead Or Merely Dormant?, Dale K. Nichols
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
This article does not resolve the debate over involuntary public figures but argues instead that in light of the Court's pronouncements in Firestone, Hutchinson and Walston, the involuntary class should be abolished. Part I briefly traces the evolution and significance of public figure status in defamation law, and reviews various interpretations of the involuntary public figure references in Gertz. Part II examines the status of the involuntary class after Firestone, Hutchinson and Walston, and discusses the extent to which future use of the class remains logically consistent with those decisions. Finally, the article considers the merits of …
Negligent Infliction Of Emotional Distress: Keeping Dillon In Bounds
Negligent Infliction Of Emotional Distress: Keeping Dillon In Bounds
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Seamen's Death Actions Under The Jones Act, Dohsa, And The General Maritime Law: A Comparison
Seamen's Death Actions Under The Jones Act, Dohsa, And The General Maritime Law: A Comparison
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Maryland's Equal Rights Amendment Challenges The Common Law Action Of Criminal Conversation: Kline V. Ansell, Mckay Marsden
Maryland's Equal Rights Amendment Challenges The Common Law Action Of Criminal Conversation: Kline V. Ansell, Mckay Marsden
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Advertising The Economics Of High Jury Awards: The Insurance Industry's Bid For Prospective Jurors To Tighten Their Purse Strings
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Loneliness Of The Long Distance Statute, The Alien Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1350
The Loneliness Of The Long Distance Statute, The Alien Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1350
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Johnson V. Bathey, 376 So. 2d 848 (Fla. 1979), Robert Santos
Johnson V. Bathey, 376 So. 2d 848 (Fla. 1979), Robert Santos
Florida State University Law Review
Torts-ATTRACTIVE NUISANCE IN FLORIDA: AN UNATTRACTIVE NUISANCE
Tort Indemnity In Florida, Gerald T. Wetherington
Tort Indemnity In Florida, Gerald T. Wetherington
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Pursuing A Cause Of Action In Hazardous Waste Pollution Cases, Mary Margaret Fabic
Pursuing A Cause Of Action In Hazardous Waste Pollution Cases, Mary Margaret Fabic
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Informed Consent In Washington: Expanded Scope Of Material Facts That The Physician Must Disclose To His Patient, Edwin Rauzi
Informed Consent In Washington: Expanded Scope Of Material Facts That The Physician Must Disclose To His Patient, Edwin Rauzi
Washington Law Review
Part I of this comment charts the current contours of the informed consent doctrine and traces the general pro-plaintiff shift which has developed since Washington recognized the tort a decade ago. The model used to illustrate this shift is a continuum, with the poles representing doctrinal and social policy choices favorable either to the plaintiff-patient or to the defendant-physician. Part II examines the expanded scope of the physician's duty to disclose material facts. This comment posits that the material facts which the physician must disclose to his patient are the risks involved in a proposed treatment, the alternatives to the …
Torts—Wrongful Birth—New Jersey Recognizes Emotional Distress Damages In A Wrongful Birth Action Involving A Deformed Child—Berman V. Allan, 80 N.J. 421, 404 A.2d (1979), T. Ryan Durkan
Washington Law Review
This note begins by reviewing developments that created the legal and social setting for the Berman decision. After analyzing the court's opinion the focus shifts to the issue of damages. A valuation scheme is then proposed to effectuate the conclusion that both pecuniary and emotional damages should be awarded in wrongful birth actions involving impaired children.
Settlement Strategy, Evaluation, And Brochures Lawyer's Forum - Settlements - New Perspectives., James L. Branton
Settlement Strategy, Evaluation, And Brochures Lawyer's Forum - Settlements - New Perspectives., James L. Branton
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Election Of Remedies And Settlement - New Lyrics To An Outworn Tune Lawyer's Forum - Settlements - New Perspectives., Les Mendelsohn
Election Of Remedies And Settlement - New Lyrics To An Outworn Tune Lawyer's Forum - Settlements - New Perspectives., Les Mendelsohn
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Products Liability: Manufacturer's Liability For Products Not Unreasonably Dangerous When Originally Marketed - A Commentary On Bell Helicopter Company V. Bradshaw., Keith B. O'Connell
Products Liability: Manufacturer's Liability For Products Not Unreasonably Dangerous When Originally Marketed - A Commentary On Bell Helicopter Company V. Bradshaw., Keith B. O'Connell
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Contribution And Indemnity Between Negligent And Strictly Liable Tortfeasors Lawyer's Forum - Settlements - New Perspectives., James B. Sales
Contribution And Indemnity Between Negligent And Strictly Liable Tortfeasors Lawyer's Forum - Settlements - New Perspectives., James B. Sales
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Contribution Among Antitrust Defendants, Jane G. Parks
Contribution Among Antitrust Defendants, Jane G. Parks
Vanderbilt Law Review
This Recent Development argues that no single federal common law rule of contribution exists and that federal securities law decisions provide the best analogy from which to imply a right of contribution under the antitrust laws. Thus, the Recent Development proposes that the Supreme Court should fashion a rule permitting contribution among antitrust defendants.
Constitutional Law-Defamation-The Supreme Court Places Further Limitations On Designation As A "Public Figure" In Libel Actions- Wolston V. Reader's Digest Association, 443 U.S. 147 (1979)
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Duty To Rescue In Tort Law: Implications Of Research On Altruism, Viloa C. Brady
The Duty To Rescue In Tort Law: Implications Of Research On Altruism, Viloa C. Brady
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Commercial Carrier Corp. V. Indian River County, 371 So. 2d 1010 (Fla. 1979), S. Stockwell Stoutamire
Commercial Carrier Corp. V. Indian River County, 371 So. 2d 1010 (Fla. 1979), S. Stockwell Stoutamire
Florida State University Law Review
Torts-THE DOCTRINE OF SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY IS ALIVE AND WELL
Rethinking The Policies Of Strict Products Liability, David G. Owen
Rethinking The Policies Of Strict Products Liability, David G. Owen
Vanderbilt Law Review
In the evolution of products liability law, therefore,should be the time for doing what usually comes late in the common-law process: to develop a system of fundamental social values and goals to be protected and advanced by the law in this area. Broadly stated, an appropriate balance between individual liberty and social welfare needs to be struck within a fair and workable adjudicatory system. Once a jurisprudential basis of this type has been set, we may then begin to develop a consistent set of principles tailored to this area of the law. It will then be possible to construct one …
Defining The Government's Duty Under The Federal Tort Claims Act, Thomas A. Varlan
Defining The Government's Duty Under The Federal Tort Claims Act, Thomas A. Varlan
Vanderbilt Law Review
This Recent Development traces the Supreme Court's development of the analogous private liability test and examines the recent cases applying this test. The Recent Development then analyzes the divergent approaches taken in these cases and attempts to determine when an actionable duty arises under the Act.
On Product "Design Defects" And Their Actionability, John W. Wade
On Product "Design Defects" And Their Actionability, John W. Wade
Vanderbilt Law Review
This Article has tried to explain and discuss these developments, to evaluate them, to show their relationship to the general state of the law, and to make suggestions on how far they should affect its future development. At present, the question of "design defects" and the determination of when a product is actionable because of the nature of its design appears to be the most agitated and controversial question before the courts in the field of products liability. I hope that this Article can be of some help to the courts in seeking to develop the most suitable answer to …
Reconsidering Plaintiff's Fault In Product Liability Litigation: The Proposed Conscious Design Choice Exception, Vincent S. Walkowiak
Reconsidering Plaintiff's Fault In Product Liability Litigation: The Proposed Conscious Design Choice Exception, Vincent S. Walkowiak
Vanderbilt Law Review
The Uniform Comparative Fault Act, drafted by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, was approved by the Commissioners in 1977. Dean John W. Wade was Chairman of the special committee that drafted the Act. The Act is a comparative-fault, rather than a comparative-negligence, act; it applies to all nonintentional torts, including products liability actions, whether they are based on negligence, breach of warranty,or strict tort liability. The Act seeks to address the problem of the relationship between the doctrines of comparative negligence and strict liability for products by permitting plaintiff's fault to effect a proportional reduction in …