Law Commons^™

Rights, Wrongs, And Recourse In The Law Of Torts, Benjamin C. Zipursky

Vanderbilt Law Review

Cardozo's opinion in Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co.' hinges on a stark assertion about rights and wrongs: A plaintiff has no right of action unless she can show "'a wrong' to herself; i.e., a violation of her own right." Cardozo himself made this principle the core of his analysis, yet scholars typically regard it as impenetrable, circular, vacuous, or, as Posner put it, "eloquent bluff." Small wonder, then, that readers typically turn to "reasonable foreseeability" as the essence of the case. Leading scholars treat Palsgraf as a proximate cause case, despite Cardozo's pronouncement that "W[the law of causation, remote …

Variation On Libel Per Quod, Laurence H. Eldredge

Vanderbilt Law Review

During the nineteenth century it became settled common law in England and in the United States that in any action for libel, as distinct from slander, the plaintiff could recover damages without pleading or proving that he had in fact suffered any damages as a result of the publication. The American Law Institute accepted this as sound law. Volume III of the Restatement of Torts, published in 1938, stated the rule in section 569: "One who falsely, and without a privilege to do so, publishes matter defamatory to another in such a manner as to make the publication a libel …

Misrepresentation And Third Persons, William L. Prosser

Vanderbilt Law Review

"The assault upon the citadel of privity is proceeding in these days apace." So said Cardozo in 1931, and he has been much quoted since. But the case' in which he said it was one of misrepresentation causing pecuniary loss to a third person who acted in reliance upon it, but to whom it was not made. It is in this area that the assault upon the citadel has made, during the intervening thirty-five years, the least headway, and has broken down into a tangle of more or less unconnected struggles which are apparently making no great progress in any …

Torts -- 1962 Tennessee Survey, Dix W. Noel

Vanderbilt Law Review

Most of the tort cases during the survey period do not involve any significant changes in the law. Mindful of the necessity of stability and predictability, and of a tradition of even-handed continuity, our courts have been naturally hesitant to upset established rules. However, in a few areas (injuries to unborn children, application of the immunity doctrine to a minor whose disability is removed, scope of liability for negligent misrepresentation) the courts have been faced with new problems and changed conditions. In these areas the decisions frankly accept responsibility for some development of legal doctrine to keep it responsive to …

Developments In The English Law Of Medical Liability, John G. Fleming

Vanderbilt Law Review

Throughout the common law world, as indeed elsewhere, our generation has been witness to an unmistakable, if not always consistent, trend of increasingly disassociating the administration of accident law from the philosophy of individual fault in favor of the collectivist principle of loss distribution, as evidenced in the movement towards stricter liability in litigation areas with a background of liability insurance. However debatable the measure of this reorientation in the United States,' it has taken very large strides in the several jurisdictions of the British Commonwealth where a pattern of loss allocation is now visibly emerging which, in many respects, …

Book Reviews, John W. Wade Dean

Vanderbilt Law Review

Cogitations on Torts

By Warren A. Seavey.

Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1954. Pp. 72. $2.00

=================================

Selected Topics on the Law of Torts

By William L. Prosser

Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1953. Pp. xi, 627.

State Law Versus A Federal Common Law Of Torts, Irvin M. Gottlieb

Vanderbilt Law Review

The Statute, Its Scope and Basic Standard Section 421(k) of the Federal Tort Claims Act excludes from its coverage "any claim arising in a foreign country."' The Foreign Claims Act which was passed by the 77th Congress and amended by the 78th Congress has specific application to foreign countries, including places located therein which are under the temporary or permanent jurisdiction of the United States.

Court test of the territorial scope of the Federal Tort Claims Act arose in a series of cases decided in 1948, culminating in United States v. Spelar, where the issue of possible foreign coverage was …

Bases For Master's Liability And For Principal's Liability To Third Persons, Merton Ferson

Vanderbilt Law Review

The law with regard to principal and agent grew up as part and parcel of the law of contracts. The law with regard to master and servant grew up as part and parcel of the law of torts. Each one takes its origin far back in the history of the common law.

Agents were used in an early day to effect livery of seisin, to create covenants, and to carry on commercial transactions. The terms "principal" and "agent" may be of modern origin. But the power of one person to bind another in legal transactions was familiar in the days …