Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Torts

Vanderbilt Law Review

Journal

1966

Negligence

Articles 1 - 2 of 2

Full-Text Articles in Law

Trespassing Children: A Study In Expanding Liability, R. Neal Batson Dec 1966

Trespassing Children: A Study In Expanding Liability, R. Neal Batson

Vanderbilt Law Review

When confronted with a case involving a child plaintiff, attorneys and the courts should recognize that the doctrine of attractive nuisance is only one of several theories on which the plaintiff may proceed against a landowner. The status of a plaintiff should first be determined. If the child is a trespasser, then either the constant trespasser theory, the known trespasser theory, or the doctrine of attractive nuisance may be applicable. It is possible, however, that the court may reject any one or all of these theories and decide the particular case under the general negligence principles of foreseeability of harm …


Landowner's Negligence Liability To Persons Entering As A Matter Of Right Or Under A Privilege Of Private Necessity, Donald W. Fish Mar 1966

Landowner's Negligence Liability To Persons Entering As A Matter Of Right Or Under A Privilege Of Private Necessity, Donald W. Fish

Vanderbilt Law Review

In modem tort law, the liability of occupiers of land for their negligence depends in the first instance upon the status of the plaintiff upon the premises. This status generally determines the level of duty which the occupier owes him, and a vast body of case law has developed dealing with the many aspects of the question.Of the myriad classes of persons to whom some duty of care maybe owed by an occupier, perhaps those who enter the premises by virtue of a legal right, and irrespective of the consent of the occupier, present the most elusive problems in analysis. …