Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Access to justice (1)
- Anti-Sexual Harassment Policies (1)
- Antitrust (1)
- Assault in the Workplace (1)
- Cannabis Law (1)
-
- Civil claims (1)
- Civil courts (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Domestic Violence Services and the Law (1)
- Economics (1)
- Employment Law (1)
- Filing Fees (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Hospitality Services (1)
- Hotel Industry (1)
- Immigration Reform (1)
- In forma pauperis (1)
- Redress (1)
- Reverse Discrimination Claims (1)
- Right to Petition (1)
- Right to file (1)
- Supreme Court (1)
- Systemic Racism (1)
- The Participation Principle (1)
- Workplace Safety (1)
- Zoning Laws (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents
Time To Panic! The Need For State Laws Mandating Panic Buttons And Anti-Sexual Harassment Policies To Protect Vulnerable Employees In The Hotel Industry, Kristy D'Angelo-Corker
Time To Panic! The Need For State Laws Mandating Panic Buttons And Anti-Sexual Harassment Policies To Protect Vulnerable Employees In The Hotel Industry, Kristy D'Angelo-Corker
Seattle University Law Review
One only has to turn on the television or read the newspaper to see news story after news story reporting instances of women facing harassment, discrimination, or assault while at work. The “Me Too” and “Time’s Up” campaigns have brought many of these issues to the forefront and have shown that women are fighting to be respected and demanding equal treatment. Although this fight for equal protection is ongoing, many women, such as those in lower-paying service industries, are still unable to protect themselves from sexual harassment, discrimination, and assault, as they do not have the support or power to …
Why Do The Poor Not Have A Constitutional Right To File Civil Claims In Court Under Their First Amendment Right To Petition The Government For A Redress Of Grievances?, Henry Rose
Seattle University Law Review
Since 1963, the United States Supreme Court has recognized a constitutional right for American groups, organizations, and persons to pursue civil litigation under the First Amendment right to petition the government for redress of grievances. However, in three cases involving poor plaintiffs decided by the Supreme Court in the early 1970s—Boddie v. Connecticut,2 United States v. Kras,3 and Ortwein v. Schwab4—the Supreme Court rejected arguments that all persons have a constitutional right to access courts to pursue their civil legal claims.5 In the latter two cases, Kras and Ortwein, the Supreme Court concluded that poor persons were properly barred from …
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents.