Law Commons^™

Equity -- 1964 Tennessee Survey, W. W. Garrett

Vanderbilt Law Review

In 1956 in the case of Langford v. Vanderbilt University, the Tennessee Supreme Court recognized the existence of a common law right of privacy. The Court of Appeals, Western Division, in Kyritsis v. Vieron, now holds that injunction does not lie to protect a personal right. The suit arose in the chancery court of Shelby County. Complainant alleged he was pastor of the Saint George's Greek Orthodox Church affiliated with the Greek Orthodox Church of North America and Canada, and that defendant was pastor of the Church of the Annunciation affiliated with the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of North and South …

Recent Cases, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

Attorneys--Interstate Legal Services and the Unauthorized Practice of Law

==============================

Conflict of Laws--New York Public Policy Permits Enforcement of Foreign Gambling Obligation

===============================

Conscientious Objectors--Universal Military Training and Service Act--Supreme Court Test of"Belief In A Relation to A Supreme Being

===============================

Constitutional Law--Abatement of Convictions Occurring Prior to Passage of Civil Rights Act of 1964

===============================

Escheats--Disputes Between States Concerning Unclaimed Corporate Obligations

===============================

Labor Law--Failure To Bargain--Employer Required To Bargain With Respect to His Proposal To Contract Out Work

================================

Professions--Canon Twenty of the Canons of Professional Ethics Interpreted To Ban Statements to News Media

================================

Taxation--Corporate Income Taxation--Merger …

Torts -- 1964 Tennessee Survey, Dix W. Noel

Vanderbilt Law Review

As usual, the Tennessee appellate courts decided a considerable number of tort cases last year, covering a wide variety of problems.There were no striking new developments. In fact, the two decisions which were awaited by the profession with the greatest interest, Kyker v. General Motors Corporation' and Texas Tunneling Co. v. City of Chattanooga, tend to slow down some modem developments. In the Kyker case, it was indicated that manufacturers are not yet strictly liable in Tennessee, at least on warranty grounds, without privity of contract. In the Texas Tunneling case, a federal court undertaking to apply Tennessee law placed …

Agency -- 1964 Tennessee Survey, John S. Beasley

Vanderbilt Law Review

During the period covered by this Survey several cases have raised rather interesting points for consideration under the law of agency. On one occasion the Tennessee Supreme Court declined the opportunity of joining the ranks of the majority of states in moving toward a more modern rule on employer's liability with respect to an employee's child injured negligently by the employee. In this and other decisions, the courts have followed Tennessee precedent rather closely, with the result that there are few changes in the law of agency.

Torts -- 1964 Tennessee Survey, Dix W. Noel

Vanderbilt Law Review

As usual, the Tennessee appellate courts decided a considerable number of tort cases last year, covering a wide variety of problems.There were no striking new developments. In fact, the two decisions which were awaited by the profession with the greatest interest, Kyker v. General Motors Corporation' and Texas Tunneling Co. v. City of Chattanooga, tend to slow down some modem developments. In the Kyker case, it was indicated that manufacturers are not yet strictly liable in Tennessee, at least on warranty grounds, without privity of contract. In the Texas Tunneling case, a federal court undertaking to apply Tennessee law placed …

Experience Or Reason: The Tort Theories Of Holmes And Doe, John P. Reid

Vanderbilt Law Review

Oliver Wendell Holmes is credited with awakening the American bar to the utility of tort theory. The author here emphasizes the contributions to tort theory made by a Chief Justice of the New Hampshire Supreme Court, Charles Cogswell Doe, during the latter half of the nineteenth century and compares and contrasts the tort theories of Holmes and Doe through analysis of the judicial opinions and other writings of each man.