Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- AI (1)
- AI torts (1)
- AI-Chaperone Liability (1)
- AV (1)
- All-party consent (1)
-
- Artificial Intelligence (1)
- Autonomous Vehicles (1)
- Battery (1)
- Brand (1)
- Cancel culture (1)
- Dubret v. Holland America Line Westours (1)
- Eavesdropping (1)
- Entertainment (1)
- Esports (1)
- Ferguson v. Bombardier Services Corporation (1)
- Gamer (1)
- Gamertag (1)
- Inc. (1)
- Intellectual property (1)
- Intentional torts (1)
- Klein v. United States (1)
- Logo (1)
- Machine learning (1)
- Maloney v. Rath (1)
- Meador v. Apple (1)
- Merchandise (1)
- Modisette v. Apple (1)
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (1)
- Negligence (1)
- One-party consent (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Where We’Re Going, We Don’T Need Drivers: Autonomous Vehicles And Ai-Chaperone Liability, Peter Y. Kim
Where We’Re Going, We Don’T Need Drivers: Autonomous Vehicles And Ai-Chaperone Liability, Peter Y. Kim
Catholic University Law Review
The future of mainstream autonomous vehicles is approaching in the rearview mirror. Yet, the current legal regime for tort liability leaves an open question on how tortious Artificial Intelligence (AI) devices and systems that are capable of machine learning will be held accountable. To understand the potential answer, one may simply go back in time and see how this question would be answered under traditional torts. This Comment tests whether the incident involving an autonomous vehicle hitting a pedestrian is covered under the traditional torts, argues that they are incapable of solving this novel problem, and ultimately proposes a new …
How Can We End #Cancelculture—Tort Liability Or Thumper’S Rule?, Nanci K. Carr
How Can We End #Cancelculture—Tort Liability Or Thumper’S Rule?, Nanci K. Carr
Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology
In the Disney film Bambi, when the young rabbit Thumper says that Bambi “is kinda wobbly” and “doesn’t walk too good,” Thumper’s mother tells him “if you can’t say something nice, don’t say anything at all.” The Des Moines Register seems to have forgotten Thumper’s Rule when it uncovered Carson King’s teenage tweets and canceled the relationship he had built with Busch Light while raising $3 million for the Stead Family Children’s Hospital. #CancelCulture is a social media phenomenon, where some people use their voices to cancel the platform enjoyed by others. It is the 2019 equivalent of the …
Privacy, Eavesdropping, And Wiretapping Across The United States: Reasonable Expectation Of Privacy And Judicial Discretion, Carol M. Bast
Privacy, Eavesdropping, And Wiretapping Across The United States: Reasonable Expectation Of Privacy And Judicial Discretion, Carol M. Bast
Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology
One-party consent and all-party consent eavesdropping and wiretapping statutes are two broad pathways for legislation to deal with the problem of secret taping and some states protect conversation under state constitutions. Whether a conversation is protected against being taped as a private conversation is often gauged by the reasonable expectation of privacy standard. Judges in both all-party consent and one-party consent jurisdictions have had to use their leeway under the reasonable expectation of privacy standard to arrive at what at the time seemed to be the most appropriate solution, perhaps in doing so creating a case law exception.
Pre-Game Strategy For Long-Term Win: Using Trademark Registration And Right Of Publicity To Protect Esports Gamers, John Bat
Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology
The soaring popularity of esports across the globe has turned ultra-talented gamers into a blend of athlete and entertainer. The youthful esports ecosystem is exploding in growth, and the world is taking notice. But are the gamers who are eyeing professional play taking basic legal steps to develop and shield their brands, as well as bolster their collective negotiating leverage with teams, leagues, and miscellaneous entities? This note explores what features of an up-and-coming esports gamer might be worth protecting through a trademark and/or personality-rights schema, which in turn, could assist competitive gamers who are interested in developing their careers …