Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Torts

St. Mary's University

Faculty Articles

Restatement (Second) of Torts

Publication Year

Articles 1 - 2 of 2

Full-Text Articles in Law

The Recycling, Dismantling, And Destruction Of Goods As A Foreseeable Use Under Section 402a Of The Restatement (Second) Of Torts, Charles E. Cantú Jan 1994

The Recycling, Dismantling, And Destruction Of Goods As A Foreseeable Use Under Section 402a Of The Restatement (Second) Of Torts, Charles E. Cantú

Faculty Articles

The past thirty years have witnessed the significant expansion and transformation of products liability law. While much of the initial confusion regarding the application and interpretation of Section 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts has been settled, some problems remain.

One of these problem areas involves the allocation of liability for injuries resulting from the destruction, dismantling, and recycling of products whose useful lives have come to an end. In this situation, the law has evolved to provide a rule that imposes no liability upon the manufacturer. The courts have reasoned that individuals engaged in reclamation procedures are not …


A New Look At An Old Conundrum: The Determinative Test For The Hybrid Sales/Service Transaction Under Section 402a Of The Restatement (Second) Of Torts, Charles E. Cantú Jan 1993

A New Look At An Old Conundrum: The Determinative Test For The Hybrid Sales/Service Transaction Under Section 402a Of The Restatement (Second) Of Torts, Charles E. Cantú

Faculty Articles

Historically, the concept of strict tort liability was confined to two areas: injuries resulting from dangerous activities, and harm inflicted by wild and/or dangerous animals. However, in 1963, the California Supreme Court held in Greenman v. Yuba Power Products that the theory of strict liability in tort also included products. Then, in 1965, The Restatement (Second) of Torts adopted Section 402A and endorsed the theory of Greenman that strict liability was available as a distinct cause of action in litigation involving injuries caused by defective products.

Though there was some initial confusion associated with the application of some of the …