Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Tort (2)
- Balancing tests (1)
- Battery (1)
- Choice of law (1)
- Common law evolution (1)
-
- Common law rules (1)
- Conflict of law (1)
- Damage (1)
- Decisions biasing the legal standard (1)
- Duty (1)
- Externality (1)
- Fault (1)
- Intent (1)
- Intentional (1)
- Intentional tort (1)
- Law of decision site (1)
- Law of forum (1)
- Law of injury site (1)
- Liability (1)
- Liability rules (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Litigation procedure (1)
- Negligence (1)
- Property rules (1)
- Proximate cause (1)
- Strict liability (1)
- Subsidy (1)
- Tax (1)
- Theory of efficient legal rules (1)
- Theory of litigation (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Duty In Tort Law: An Economic Approach, Keith N. Hylton
Duty In Tort Law: An Economic Approach, Keith N. Hylton
Faculty Scholarship
Theories of tort law have focused on the breach and causation components of negligence, saying little if anything about duty. This paper provides a positive economic theory of duty doctrine. The theory that best explains duty doctrines in tort law is the same as the theory that explains strict liability doctrine. The core function of both sets of doctrines is to regulate the frequency or scale of activities that have substantial external effects. Strict liability aims to suppress or tax activities that carry unusually large external costs. Duty doctrines, especially those relieving actors of a duty of care, serve several …
Information, Litigation, And Common Law Evolution, Keith N. Hylton
Information, Litigation, And Common Law Evolution, Keith N. Hylton
Faculty Scholarship
It is common in the legal academy to describe judicial decision trends leading to new common law rules as resulting from conscious judicial effort. Evolutionary models of litigation, in contrast, treat common law as resulting from pressure applied by litigants. One apparent difficulty in the theory of litigation is explaining how trends in judicial decisions favoring one litigant, and biasing the legal standard, could occur. This article presents a model in which an apparent bias in the legal standard can occur in the absence of any effort toward this end on the part of judges. Trends can develop favoring the …
A Restatement (Third) Of Intentional Torts?, Kenneth Simons
A Restatement (Third) Of Intentional Torts?, Kenneth Simons
Faculty Scholarship
Some intentional tort doctrines have developed in intriguing ways since the Restatement Second was published, and other doctrines remain contentious or obscure. For example, disagreement persists about whether the tort of battery requires merely the (single) intent to make a nonconsensual contact, or the (dual) intent both (1) to contact and (2) either to harm or to offend. The single intent view is much more plausible; the dual intent view cannot make much sense of the liability of well-intentioned doctors for battery if they exceed the patient's consent, or the liability of pranksters, or the well-accepted doctrine of apparent consent. …
Liability Externalities And The Law: A Comment On Cooter And Porat, Keith N. Hylton
Liability Externalities And The Law: A Comment On Cooter And Porat, Keith N. Hylton
Faculty Scholarship
Robert Cooter and Ariel Porat have offered a simple model of tort liability with sensible reform proposals. Their focus is in on damage levels, and how those levels can be modified to reflect the socially desirable level of externalization. However, to the extent that there is any gain to be achieved by modifying damage awards, it would be better to secure this gain through other approaches, such as adopting a more careful analysis of factual causation or reducing the likelihood of judicial error.
Torts And Choice Of Law: Searching For Principles, Keith N. Hylton
Torts And Choice Of Law: Searching For Principles, Keith N. Hylton
Faculty Scholarship
If a tortious act (e.g., negligently firing a rifle) occurs in state X and the harm (e.g., killing a bystander) occurs in state Y, which state's law should apply? This is a simple example of the choice of law problem in torts. The problem arises between states or provinces with different laws within one nation and between different nations. In this article I discuss this problem largely in terms of incentive effects and also consider where this topic might be addressed in a torts course.