Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Torts - Recklessness - Liability Of Driver Under "Host-Guest" Statute
Torts - Recklessness - Liability Of Driver Under "Host-Guest" Statute
Michigan Law Review
Iowa Code, 1927, sec. 5026-b1, provides that no automobile owner or operator shall be liable for injuries received by a gratuitous occupant therein, except those caused by the driver's intoxication or reckless operation. Defendant, a rather inexperienced driver, became excited upon coming to a hill and pressed the accelerator instead of the brake, causing an accident which injured plaintiff, a gratuitous passenger in the car. The jury found that defendant had been driving recklessly. In reversing for error in instruction, the court held that recklessness may or may not include wilfulness or wantonness, but always implies no care, coupled with …
Negligence - Amusements - Assumption Of Risk By Football Spectators
Negligence - Amusements - Assumption Of Risk By Football Spectators
Michigan Law Review
The plaintiff, a woman who had paid to witness a football game played on defendant's field, stood near the boundaries of the playing field and was hurt when hit by a player tackled at the side-line. The evidence disclosed that the field was not roped off for the minor games, that there was no policing except that done by a few school officials, and that the spectators were not required to occupy seats in the stands. Reversing the lower court, the appellate tribunal held that, under these circumstances, there was no negligence, the opinion of the majority indicating that, if …
Municipal Corporations - Governmental Function - Liability For Nuisance
Municipal Corporations - Governmental Function - Liability For Nuisance
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff was injured at a municipal bathing beach as the result of a dive from a spring board into shallow water. Held, that while the city was not liable for the negligent performance of a governmental function, the jury would be justified in finding that the diving board, as erected, constituted a nuisance, and that the defendant city would be liable, on that ground, for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff. Hoffman v. City of Bristol, 113 Conn. 386, 155 Atl. 499 (1931).
Negligence - Res Ipsa Loquitur - Circumstantial Evidence
Negligence - Res Ipsa Loquitur - Circumstantial Evidence
Michigan Law Review
Defendant company owned, and was in possession of, a wall, from the top of which a loose piece of concrete fell and injured the plaintiff who was at work on land adjoining. In affirming a judgment for plaintiff, the court held that, while the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur did not apply, there was "evidence from which the jury could legitimately infer that the defendant was negligent in permitting loose pieces of concrete to remain on the wall." Pope v. Rending Co., (Pa. 1931) 156 Atl. 106.