Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
On Tax Increase Limitations: Part Ii -- Evasion And Transcendence, David Gamage, Darien Shanske
On Tax Increase Limitations: Part Ii -- Evasion And Transcendence, David Gamage, Darien Shanske
Articles by Maurer Faculty
In this essay, the second of a series, we continue our evaluation of state Tax Increase Limitations (TILs) – special rules that limit state legislatures’ ability to raise taxes, such as by requiring supermajority votes. We analyze two strategies whereby majority parties can evade TILs to the extent they so desire. We further argue that these strategies have some positive normative features. The strategies designed to evade TILs may ultimately lead toward a more effective means for controlling the size of state government than TILs themselves are able to provide.
The Saga Of State "Amazon" Laws: Reflections On The Colorado Decision, David Gamage, Darien Shanske
The Saga Of State "Amazon" Laws: Reflections On The Colorado Decision, David Gamage, Darien Shanske
Articles by Maurer Faculty
We analyze the Colorado district court’s decision in Direct Marketing Association v. Huber – a decision that permanently enjoined Colorado’s "Amazon" law. Had it not been enjoined, the Colorado law would have mandated information reporting by remote e-commerce vendors so that Colorado could levy its sales and use tax on the e-commerce purchases made by Colorado residents. We evaluate the applicability of the Tax (Anti-)Injunction Act and whether the Colorado statute and regulations should be reviewed as a tax or as a regulation. We also suggest alternative approaches that state legislatures might use in order to levy taxes on remote …
A Better Way Forward For State Taxation Of E-Commerce, David Gamage, Devin J. Heckman
A Better Way Forward For State Taxation Of E-Commerce, David Gamage, Devin J. Heckman
Articles by Maurer Faculty
We propose a novel solution for states that wish to tax interstate e-commerce – based on fully and adequately compensating remote vendors for all tax compliance costs. We argue that our proposed solution is compatible with the Quill framework for when states can constitutionally impose burdens on remote vendors. We argue that unlike our proposed solution, the recent state attempts to tax interstate e-commerce through so-called “Amazon laws” are unconstitutional, ineffective, or both. We thus urge the states to adopt our proposed approach as the best way forward for state taxation of interstate e-commerce.