Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Corporate tax (1)
- Discharge of indebtedness (1)
- Dividend exemption (1)
- Divorce (1)
- Double taxation (1)
-
- Earned income tax credit (1)
- Income tax burden (1)
- Individual income taxation (1)
- Integration (1)
- Internal Revenue Code Section 1001 (1)
- Internal Revenue Code Section 108 (1)
- Lowering of corporate tax rate (1)
- Medicare (1)
- Mortgage debt relief (1)
- One percent (1)
- Payroll taxes (1)
- Property settlement (1)
- Reform (1)
- Return free tax system (1)
- Social Security (1)
- Tax justice (1)
- Tax reform (1)
- Taxpayer Relief Act (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Reckless Means Reckless: Understanding The Eitc Ban, John Plecnik
Reckless Means Reckless: Understanding The Eitc Ban, John Plecnik
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
This article argues that the legislative history of the EITC ban demonstrates that Congress intended to import to section 32(k) the well-established definition for reckless or intentional disregard from section 6662, which imposes the accuracy-related penalties.
The Future Of Corporate Tax Reform: A Debate, Deborah A. Geier, Omni Y. Marian, David S. Miller, Adam H. Rosenzweig
The Future Of Corporate Tax Reform: A Debate, Deborah A. Geier, Omni Y. Marian, David S. Miller, Adam H. Rosenzweig
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
Professor Geier participated in a Lincoln-Douglas style debate, where the debaters were assigned different roles, so the opinions expressed were not necessarily their own. On the first point debated, Professor Geier was assigned to argue: The Affirmative: We Need to Tax Corporationsat the Entity Level. Others argued the negative: The United States Should Repeal the Corporate Income Tax. On the second point debated, Professor Geier argued the negative, that Dividend Exemption Is NOT the Best Method of Corporate/Shareholder Integration, and is in fact the worst method. On the third point, Professor Geier argued in the affirmative, that the corporate tax …
Another Take On The Mortgage Debt Relief Situation, Deborah A. Geier
Another Take On The Mortgage Debt Relief Situation, Deborah A. Geier
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
Prof. Deborah A. Geier responds to Prof. Stephen Cohen's viewpoint on the mortgage debt relief debate.
Incremental Versus Fundamental Tax Reform And The Top One Percent, Deborah A. Geier
Incremental Versus Fundamental Tax Reform And The Top One Percent, Deborah A. Geier
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
This article describes the historical shift from consumption taxation at the federal level to income taxation with the enactment of the 16th amendment (the intent of which was chiefly to tax the capital income of the wealthy) and the incremental shifts since then back toward consumption taxation (which frees capital from tax) through expansion of both the payroll taxes as well as the consumption tax features of our current hybrid income/consumption tax that target the middle class.
It then addresses the issue of whether we ought to expand consumption tax treatment to the very wealthy by reviewing two recently published …
Integrating The Tax Burdens Of The Federal Income And Payroll Taxes On Labor Income, Deborah A. Geier
Integrating The Tax Burdens Of The Federal Income And Payroll Taxes On Labor Income, Deborah A. Geier
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
This 2002 article explores the increasing burden of federal income and payroll taxes on labor income and how those tax burdens might be integrated.
Simplifying And Rationalizing The Federal Income Tax Law Applicable To Transfers In Divorce, Deborah A. Geier
Simplifying And Rationalizing The Federal Income Tax Law Applicable To Transfers In Divorce, Deborah A. Geier
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
This 2002 article explores the tax consequences of transfers in divorce and suggests how the tax consequences can be both simplified and rationalized. This article was written as an "Academic Adviser" to the Joint Committee on Taxation in connection with a study mandated by Congress on the overall state of the Federal tax system (June 2000 through April 2001) and was first published at JOINT COMMITTEE ON TAXATION, STUDY OF THE OVERALL STATE OF THE FEDERAL TAX SYSTEM AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SIMPLIFICATION JCS-3-01, VOLUME III (ACADEMIC PAPERS), April, 2001, at 19.