Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 9 of 9

Full-Text Articles in Law

Taxation--Income Tax--Family Partnerships--Application Of The Tower-Lusthaus Doctrine, Earl R. Boonstra S.Ed. Dec 1949

Taxation--Income Tax--Family Partnerships--Application Of The Tower-Lusthaus Doctrine, Earl R. Boonstra S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Respondent and his four sons formed a partnership in 1939. The sons contributed cattle and property purchased from respondent who accepted their notes in return. Subsequently, part of the notes were forgiven and part paid from shares of the firm proceeds. A firm bank account was opened on which all members could draw. It was planned that all the sons would render substantial services to the partnership. However, the plan was disrupted when the two eldest were called to military duty, and the two minor sons continued their education. A partnership return was filed for 1940. The Commissioner determined a …


Taxation-Federal Income Tax-Taxability To Nonresident Alien Of Lump Sum Payments For Copyright, Myron J. Nadler S.Ed. Nov 1949

Taxation-Federal Income Tax-Taxability To Nonresident Alien Of Lump Sum Payments For Copyright, Myron J. Nadler S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Taxpayer, a nonresident alien author not engaged in trade or business within the United States, delivered certain literary works to American publishers under agreement whereby the latter were to copyright and publish these stories and reassign to the taxpayer after publication all rights except the American serial rights. Lump sum payments for each story were received during the years 1938 and 1941. No tax was paid on these amounts and a deficiency was assessed on the ground that they constituted royalties received for the use of United States copyrights and were taxable as ordinary income. The circuit court of appeals …


Taxation-Income Tax-Realization Of Income By Corporation In Distribution Of Notes To Shareholders, David H. Armstrong S. Ed. Apr 1949

Taxation-Income Tax-Realization Of Income By Corporation In Distribution Of Notes To Shareholders, David H. Armstrong S. Ed.

Michigan Law Review

A corporation charged off notes as worthless prior to 1942. Anticipating future collections on the notes, the corporation distributed them as a dividend in kind. The commissioner determined that the amount collected subsequent to distribution was taxable to the corporation. The Tax Court held that no income was realized by the corporation. On appeal, held, reversed. This was not a distribution of capital assets but rather an assignment of anticipated income. Commissioner v. First State Bank of Stratford, (C.C.A. 5th, 1948) 168 F. (2d) 1004, certiorari denied, 335 U.S. 867, 69 S.Ct. 137 (1948).


Attorneys -Taxation - Unauthorized Practice Of Income Tax Law By Certified Public Accountants, Charles D. Bell S. Ed. Apr 1949

Attorneys -Taxation - Unauthorized Practice Of Income Tax Law By Certified Public Accountants, Charles D. Bell S. Ed.

Michigan Law Review

The accepted law in the United States is that laymen may not engage in the practice of law. However, the enigma of what constitutes the practice of law has plagued laymen, lawyers and the courts for many years. Attempts to find the answer have engendered intense friction between various professional groups, each arguing that its jurisdiction extends further than the other admits. The greatest animosity has developed between lawyers and certified public accountants in the dispute as to their respective functions in the income tax field.


Taxation-Income Tax-Deductions For Alimony Payments Made Under Voluntary Agreement Of Separation, William R. Hewitt S. Ed. Mar 1949

Taxation-Income Tax-Deductions For Alimony Payments Made Under Voluntary Agreement Of Separation, William R. Hewitt S. Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Taxpayer and his wife voluntarily entered into a written agreement of separation. Pursuant to the agreement, taxpayer made periodic payments to his wife in discharge of his legal obligation of support. In his income tax return for 1943, taxpayer took the amount of tlie payments made for that year as a deduction from gross income under the authority of section 23(u) of the Internal Revenue Code. The commissioner disallowed the deduction and determined a tax deficiency. Upon petition to the Tax Court for a redetermination of the deficiency, the commissioner was upheld. On appeal, held, affirmed. Only alimony payments …


Stanley And Kilcullen: The Federal Income Tax: A Guide To The Law., Michigan Law Review Mar 1949

Stanley And Kilcullen: The Federal Income Tax: A Guide To The Law., Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

A Review of THE FEDERAL INCOME TAX: A GUIDE TO THE LAW. By Joyce Stanley and Richard Kilcullen.


Tax Practitioners Forum, Michigan Law Review Mar 1949

Tax Practitioners Forum, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

A Review of TAX PRACTITIONERS FORUM


Taxation-Income Tax-Validity Of Family Partnership Where Partner's Services Are To Be Performed In Future, Daniel W. Reddin, Iii S.Ed. Feb 1949

Taxation-Income Tax-Validity Of Family Partnership Where Partner's Services Are To Be Performed In Future, Daniel W. Reddin, Iii S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

In 1939, petitioner sold certain ranch properties and half of his herd of blooded cattle to his four sons, accepting their notes in return. A firm consisting of petitioner and his sons was then formed, and a bank account was opened upon which any of the members of the firm could draw. Two of the sons were minors, but all were ranch-reared and experienced in cattle raising. The sons paid part of the notes with their shares in the proceeds from firm sales, and petitioner forgave the rest. Military duty disrupted the plan by which all the sons were to …


Taxation-Income Tax-Taxable Persons--Assignment Of License Royalties, J. R. Mackenzie S.Ed. Jan 1949

Taxation-Income Tax-Taxable Persons--Assignment Of License Royalties, J. R. Mackenzie S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

X contracted with a corporation controlled by him for the manufacture of machines on which he held patents. No minimum was established with respect to production or the payment of royalties. The contracts were terminable by either party upon notice, and X was free to make similar contracts with other manufacturers. X assigned all his interest in the contracts and exclusive title and power over the royalties to his wife, who thereafter received all payments and reported them as her income. The Tax Court ruled that since X could cancel the contracts directly, and could indirectly control the contracts through …