Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Officers Under The Appointments Clause, John Plecnik
Officers Under The Appointments Clause, John Plecnik
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
Much ink has been spilled, and many keyboards worn, debating the definition of "Officers of the United States" under the Appointments Clause of Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the Constitution. The distinction between Officers and employees is constitutionally and practically significant, because the former must be appointed by the President, with or without the advice and consent of the Senate, Courts of Law, or Heads of Departments. In contrast, employees may be hired by anyone in any manner.
Appointments Clause controversies are triggered when a government official who was hired as an employee is accused of unconstitutionally wielding …
The Emasculated Role Of Judicial Precedent In The Tax Court And Internal Revenue Service, Deborah A. Geier
The Emasculated Role Of Judicial Precedent In The Tax Court And Internal Revenue Service, Deborah A. Geier
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
This article examines the Tax Court and the Internal Revenue Service. Part I discusses the structural and decision-making evolution of the Tax Court as well as the most common recommendation for change--the creation of a National Court of Tax Appeals. Part II examines the nonacquiescence practice of the Internal Revenue Service and the current state of the law with respect to intracircuit nonacquiescence. The article concludes that an expanded concept of stare decisis can alleviate many of the problems without the massive structural change entailed in the creation of a National Court of Tax Appeals.