Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Tax Law

University of Michigan Law School

Michigan Law Review

Tax deductions

Articles 1 - 5 of 5

Full-Text Articles in Law

Patrons Despite Themselves: Taxpayers And Arts Policy, Michigan Law Review Feb 1984

Patrons Despite Themselves: Taxpayers And Arts Policy, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Patrons Despite Themselves: Taxpayers and Arts Policy by Alan L. Feld, Michael O'Hare, and J. Mark Davidson Schuster


Home Office Deductions: May A Taxpayer Have More Than One Principal Place Of Business?, Michigan Law Review Aug 1981

Home Office Deductions: May A Taxpayer Have More Than One Principal Place Of Business?, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

This Note argues that the Tax Court's more liberal interpretation is correct because it more nearly reflects Congress's intent. Part I seeks a basis for preferring one of the competing interpretations in the text of section 280A and in the section's legislative history, but finds none. Looking, of necessity, to the purposes that Congress sought to advance with section 280A, Part II argues that those purposes do not demand a restrictive reading of "principal place of business." Such a reading, moreover, would undermine fundamental and longstanding congressional tax policies. In the absence of a more explicit statement of congressional intent, …


The Judicial Public Policy Doctrine In Tax Litigation, Michigan Law Review Nov 1975

The Judicial Public Policy Doctrine In Tax Litigation, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

This Note evaluates the merits of Revenue Ruling 74-323. First, it asserts that, while not arbitrary, the Service's resolution of the preemption issue was not mandated by the language of amended section 162 or by the relevant legislative history. Second, it maintains that it is both appropriate and procedurally feasible to apply the judicial public policy doctrine to violations of federal civil rights laws that impose no fine, imprisonment, loss of license, or other criminal penalty. The denial of a deduction in this situation would extend the public policy doctrine beyond both section 162(c)(2) and the judicial doctrine as it …


Tax Practitioners Forum, Michigan Law Review Mar 1949

Tax Practitioners Forum, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

A Review of TAX PRACTITIONERS FORUM


Abstracts, Mary Jane Plumer Feb 1945

Abstracts, Mary Jane Plumer

Michigan Law Review

The abstracts consist merely of summaries of the facts and holdings of recent cases and are distinguished from the notes by the absence of discussion.