Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Creditor’S Failure To File A Proof Of Claim Is Inexcusable Where Potential Danger Of Prejudice To Debtor Exists, Meghan Lombardo
Creditor’S Failure To File A Proof Of Claim Is Inexcusable Where Potential Danger Of Prejudice To Debtor Exists, Meghan Lombardo
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
The Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure provide that when an act is required … to be done at or within a specified period … the court for cause shown may at any time in its discretion… on motion made after the expiration of the specified period permit the act to be done where the failure to act was the result of excusable neglect. Rule 9006 grants a pardon for late filings that were caused by neglect. The Supreme Court has defined neglect as “‘giv[ing] little attention or respect’ to a matter or… ‘to leave undone or unattended to especially …
The Nondischargeability Of Government Cleanup Orders, Christina Mavrikis
The Nondischargeability Of Government Cleanup Orders, Christina Mavrikis
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
One of the primary purposes of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) is to provide debtors with a financial fresh start. Upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition by or against the debtor, section 362(a) of the Bankruptcy Code provides that all entities are barred from actions to collect, assess, or recover any pre-petition claims against the debtor. In general, the automatic stay serves to halt any pending legal proceedings against the debtor so that the pre-petition claims can be managed and discharged by the bankruptcy court. There are, however, exceptions to the automatic stay. …
A Showing Of Gross Recklessness Satisfies Section 523(A)(2)(A): Denying Deceivers The Ability To Discharge Debts Related To Fraudulently Obtained Funds, Megan Kuzniewski
A Showing Of Gross Recklessness Satisfies Section 523(A)(2)(A): Denying Deceivers The Ability To Discharge Debts Related To Fraudulently Obtained Funds, Megan Kuzniewski
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
11 U.S.C. Section 523(a) lists certain debts that may not be discharged through a debtor’s bankruptcy. In particular, section 523(a)(2)(A) provides that a debtor who files bankruptcy will not be discharged of debts that were obtained by “false pretenses, a false representation, or actual fraud, other than a statement respecting the debtor’s or an insider’s financial condition.” False representations, such as those described in section 523(a)(2)(A), carry a scienter requirement which requires that it be shown that an individual knowingly made false statements or representations. This requirement carries a heavy burden, as trying to prove that a person had …
The Continued Growth Of The Presumption Against Extraterritoriality And Its Impact On The Bankruptcy Code’S Avoidance Provisions, Michael Vandermark
The Continued Growth Of The Presumption Against Extraterritoriality And Its Impact On The Bankruptcy Code’S Avoidance Provisions, Michael Vandermark
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Exceprt)
Over the past several years, ever since the United States Supreme Court’s seminal decision in Morrison v. National Australia Bank Limited, the presumption against extraterritoriality has steadily expanded across much of the legal field. In doing so, the presumption has again become the dominant standard in deciding whether Congressional legislation may be used on an extraterritorial basis. This expansion has recently encompassed portions of the Bankruptcy Code, specifically, its avoidance provisions.
The presumption, as noted in detail below, relies on the premise that although the legislature has the authority to regulate beyond the borders of the United States, …