Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (32)
- University of Richmond (14)
- William & Mary Law School (14)
- University of Colorado Law School (10)
- Columbia Law School (3)
-
- Georgia State University College of Law (2)
- New York Law School (2)
- North Carolina Central University School of Law (2)
- UIC School of Law (2)
- University of Baltimore Law (2)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (2)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Florida International University College of Law (1)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (1)
- Minnesota State University, Mankato (1)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (1)
- Selected Works (1)
- Southern Methodist University (1)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- University of Miami Law School (1)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (1)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (1)
- University of Washington School of Law (1)
- University of the District of Columbia School of Law (1)
- University of the Pacific (1)
- West Virginia University (1)
- Keyword
-
- United States Supreme Court (42)
- Supreme Court (11)
- Media (8)
- Oral arguments (7)
- Sixth Amendment (7)
-
- Federal Circuit (6)
- Open government (6)
- Patent law (6)
- Public interest (6)
- Television (6)
- Law reform (5)
- Transparency (5)
- Confrontation Clause (4)
- Constitutional law (4)
- Crawford v. Washington (4)
- Cross-examination (4)
- International law (4)
- Patent system (4)
- Privacy (4)
- Testimony (4)
- Access to information (3)
- Book reviews (3)
- Davis v. Washington (3)
- Federalism (3)
- Hearsay (3)
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. (3)
- Patent and Trademark Office (3)
- Patent reform (3)
- Patentability (3)
- Segregation (3)
- Publication
-
- Articles (14)
- University of Richmond Law Review (14)
- Supreme Court Preview (11)
- Publications (10)
- Michigan Law Review First Impressions (9)
-
- Michigan Law Review (7)
- Faculty Scholarship (6)
- All Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Faculty Publications (3)
- Faculty Publications By Year (2)
- Journal Articles (2)
- North Carolina Central Law Review (2)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (2)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (2)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (2)
- Andrew P. Morriss (1)
- Articles and Writings (1)
- Books (1)
- Democracy/Government (1)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (1)
- Faculty Works (1)
- Kentucky Law Journal (1)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (1)
- McGeorge Law Review (1)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (1)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (1)
- Public Interest Law Reporter (1)
- Washington Law Review (1)
- West Virginia Law Review (1)
- William & Mary Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 104
Full-Text Articles in Law
Is There A Dormant Extraterritoriality Principle?: Commerce Clause Limits On State Antitrust Laws, Michael J. Ruttinger
Is There A Dormant Extraterritoriality Principle?: Commerce Clause Limits On State Antitrust Laws, Michael J. Ruttinger
Michigan Law Review
State antitrust laws ordinarily supplement federal law by providing a cause of action for anticompetitive activity that occurs in the state. Some states, however, have construed their antitrust regimes to reach conduct that occurs outside the state's boundaries. Such regulation raises significant federalism and Commerce Clause concerns by creating possible extraterritorial liability for conduct with virtually no in-state effect. This Note examines two Commerce Clause standards that may limit the degree to which state antitrust laws may exercise extraterritorial force-the "dormant" or "negative" Commerce Clause and the so-called "Extraterritorial Principle." Unfortunately, the dormant Commerce Clause test, as articulated in Pike …
The Common Law Genius Of The Warren Court, David A. Strauss
The Common Law Genius Of The Warren Court, David A. Strauss
William & Mary Law Review
The Warren Court's most important decisions-on school segregation, reapportionment, free speech, and criminal procedure are firmly entrenched in the law. But the idea persists, even among those who are sympathetic to the results that the Warren Court reached, that what the Warren Court was doing was somehow not really law: that the Warren Court "made it up," and that the important Warren Court decisions cannot be justified by reference to conventional legal materials. It is true that the Warren Court's most important decisions cannot be easily justified on the basis of the text of the Constitution or the original understandings. …
Corporate And Business Law, Gregory R. Bishop, Laurence V. Parker
Corporate And Business Law, Gregory R. Bishop, Laurence V. Parker
University of Richmond Law Review
In 2005, the Virginia Stock Corporation Act (the "Virginia Act") was extensively revised and updated for the first time since 1985. Having just undertaken such a major revision to the Virginia Act,
the General Assembly further amended the Act in a more targeted fashion in 2006 and 2007. Section II of this article addresses some of the changes that have taken place since the 2005 amendments and gives a brief overview of some conforming changes that have been incorporated in the Virginia Nonstock Corporation Act (the "Nonstock Act").
There has also been a concerted effort to conform the language and …
Exclusion Confusion? A Defense Of The Federal Circuit's Specific Exclusion Jurisprudence, Peter Curtis Magic
Exclusion Confusion? A Defense Of The Federal Circuit's Specific Exclusion Jurisprudence, Peter Curtis Magic
Michigan Law Review
Specific exclusion has become a controversial limitation on the doctrine of equivalents, which is itself an essential and controversial area of patent law. The doctrine of equivalents allows a patentee to successfully claim infringement against devices that are outside of the literal reach of the language used by the patentee in her patent to describe what she claims as her invention. The Supreme Court has prescribed some of the outer limits of the doctrine of equivalents and articulated the underlying policy concerns that inform its analysis-noting that courts should balance protection of the patentee's intellectual property with the public's reasonable …
Issue 2: Annual Survey 2007 Table Of Contents
Issue 2: Annual Survey 2007 Table Of Contents
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Embracing The Living Constitution: Justice Anthony M. Kennedy's Move Away From A Conservative Methodology Of Constitutional Interpretation, Lisa K. Parshall
Embracing The Living Constitution: Justice Anthony M. Kennedy's Move Away From A Conservative Methodology Of Constitutional Interpretation, Lisa K. Parshall
North Carolina Central Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court Report 2006-2007: Closing Of The Courthouse Doors?, Julie M. Cheslik, Andrea Mcmurty, Kristin Underwood
Supreme Court Report 2006-2007: Closing Of The Courthouse Doors?, Julie M. Cheslik, Andrea Mcmurty, Kristin Underwood
Faculty Works
This article reviews the decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court for the 2006-2007 term focusing on decisions of particular relevance to state and local government. In reviewing those decisions, we focus on the shifts in the Court over time on those issues.
The expectation that the Supreme Court would shift to the right came to fruition in the 2006-07 term by the sheer lack of clear decisions on the merits. Time and again, the Court decided cases on the standing issue, never reaching the merits and frustrating litigants and citizens attempts to define their rights. Yale law professor Judith Resnick …
Reading Too Much Into Reeder-Simco?, Jeremy M. Suhr
Reading Too Much Into Reeder-Simco?, Jeremy M. Suhr
Michigan Law Review
This Note argues that a careful analysis of the Supreme Court's opinion in Volvo Trucks North America, Inc. v. Reeder-Simco GMC, Inc. demonstrates that, despite the expansive dicta appearing in part IV of that opinion, the Court did not intend to reshape the course of its Robinson-Patman Act jurisprudence in any significant way. The Court's opinion operated well within the confines of established Robinson-Patman Act doctrine, even if its searching review of the evidence presented at trial represented a rare foray into the arena of factual error correction. After Reeder-Simco, however, many commentators emphasized the dicta in part IV …
Section 6: Criminal Law, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law At The William & Mary Law School
Section 6: Criminal Law, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law At The William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
2007-2008 Supreme Court Preview: Contents, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law At The William & Mary Law School
2007-2008 Supreme Court Preview: Contents, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law At The William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 7: Election Law, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law At The William & Mary Law School
Section 7: Election Law, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law At The William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 3: The Roberts Court, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law At The William & Mary Law School
Section 3: The Roberts Court, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law At The William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 2: Moot Court, Guantanamo Detainees & The Military Commissions Act, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law At The William & Mary Law School
Section 2: Moot Court, Guantanamo Detainees & The Military Commissions Act, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law At The William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 1: The Executive Power & The War On Terror, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law At The William & Mary Law School
Section 1: The Executive Power & The War On Terror, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law At The William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 9: Looking Ahead, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law At The William & Mary Law School
Section 9: Looking Ahead, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law At The William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 8: Judicial Modesty, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law At The William & Mary Law School
Section 8: Judicial Modesty, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law At The William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 5: Business, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law At The William & Mary Law School
Section 5: Business, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law At The William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 4: Individual Rights, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law At The William & Mary Law School
Section 4: Individual Rights, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law At The William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
2007-2008 Supreme Court Preview: Schedule, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law At The William & Mary Law School
2007-2008 Supreme Court Preview: Schedule, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law At The William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Native America And The Rule Of Law, Dr. Joe Shirley Jr.
Native America And The Rule Of Law, Dr. Joe Shirley Jr.
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Dream Deferred, Lewis M. Steel '63
“Massachusetts V. Epa,” The Supreme Court: Past And Prologue – A Look At The October 2006 And October 2007 Terms, Andrew Morriss
“Massachusetts V. Epa,” The Supreme Court: Past And Prologue – A Look At The October 2006 And October 2007 Terms, Andrew Morriss
Andrew P. Morriss
No abstract provided.
Justice Kennedy And The Environment: Property, States' Rights, And A Persistent Search For Nexus, Michael C. Blumm, Sherry L. Bosse
Justice Kennedy And The Environment: Property, States' Rights, And A Persistent Search For Nexus, Michael C. Blumm, Sherry L. Bosse
Washington Law Review
Justice Anthony Kennedy, now clearly the pivot of the Roberts Court, is the Court's crucial voice in environmental law cases. Kennedy's central role was never more evident than in the two most celebrated environmental cases of the last few years, Kelo v. City of New London and Rapanos v. United States, as he supplied the critical vote in both. Kennedy has in fact been the needle of the Supreme Court's environmental law compass since his nomination in 1988. Although he wrote surprisingly few environmental law opinions over his first eighteen years on the Court, Kennedy was in the majority …
From "Navigable Waters" To "Constitutional Waters": The Future Of Federal Wetlands Regulation, Mark Squillace
From "Navigable Waters" To "Constitutional Waters": The Future Of Federal Wetlands Regulation, Mark Squillace
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Wetlands regulation in the United States has a tumultuous history. The early European settlers viewed wetlands as obstacles to development, and they drained and filled wetlands and swamps at an astounding rate, often with government support, straight through the middle of the twentieth century. As evidence of the ecological significance of wetlands emerged over the last several decades, programs to protect and restore wetlands became prominent. Most notable among these is the permitting program under section 404 of the Clean Water Act. That provision prohibits dredging or filling of "navigable waters, " defined by law to mean "waters of the …
The Press As An Interest Group: Mainstream Media In The United States Supreme Court, Eric Easton
The Press As An Interest Group: Mainstream Media In The United States Supreme Court, Eric Easton
All Faculty Scholarship
There can be little doubt that the institutional press is an interest group to be reckoned with in the Supreme Court, its aversion to such a designation notwithstanding. Over the past century, and especially since 1964, the press has secured for itself the greatest legal protection available anywhere in the world. While some of that protection has come from Congress, by far the greatest share has come from the Supreme Court's expansive interpretation of the First Amendment's Press Clause. Although the role of the press in American politics has been studied extensively for nearly two centuries, the role of the …
Furman'S Mythical Mandate, Scott W. Howe
Furman'S Mythical Mandate, Scott W. Howe
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
This Article argues for the rescue and reform of Supreme Court doctrine regulating capital sentencing trials under the Eighth Amendment. Many legal commentators, both liberal and conservative, including several members of the Supreme Court, have concluded that the Court's regulation of capital sentencing trials is a disaster. The repeated criticisms rest on a commonly accepted view about a principal goal of capital sentencing regulation. The prevailing account, fueled by the rhetoric of the Justices, stems from the notion that Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 208 (1972), revealed a mandate of consistency in the use of the death penalty that …
Issue 4: Symposium Table Of Contents
Issue 4: Symposium Table Of Contents
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.