Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- AEDPA (1)
- Boyd (1)
- CSLI (1)
- Carpenter (1)
- Carpenter v. United States (1)
-
- Cell phone (1)
- Cell site location information (1)
- Constitutional criminal procedure (1)
- Constitutional criminal procedure (1)
- Constructive search (1)
- Criminal appeals (1)
- Customer (1)
- Data (1)
- Defense counsel (1)
- Direct appeal (1)
- Effective assistance of counsel (1)
- Effects (1)
- Electronic (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Exclusionary rule (1)
- Federal Wiretapping Statute (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Habeas corpus (1)
- Information (1)
- Jones (1)
- Justice Alito (1)
- Justice Scalia (1)
- Justice Thomas (1)
- Katz (1)
- Legislative (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Ethical And Aggressive Appellate Advocacy: The Decision To Petition For Certiorari In Criminal Cases, J. Thomas Sullivan
Ethical And Aggressive Appellate Advocacy: The Decision To Petition For Certiorari In Criminal Cases, J. Thomas Sullivan
St. Mary's Law Journal
Over the past six decades, United States Supreme Court decisions have dramatically reshaped the criminal justice process to provide significant protections for defendants charged in federal and state proceedings reflecting a remarkable expansion of due process and specific constitutional guarantees. For criminal defendants seeking relief based on recognition of new rules of constitutional criminal procedure, application of existing rules or precedent to novel factual scenarios, or in some cases, enforcement of existing precedent, obtaining relief requires further action on the Court’s part. In those situations, the Court’s exercise of its certiorari jurisdiction is the exclusive remedy offering an avenue for …
Saving America’S Privacy Rights: Why Carpenter V. United States Was Wrongly Decided And Why Courts Should Be Promoting Legislative Reform Rather Than Extending Existing Privacy Jurisprudence, David Stone
St. Mary's Law Journal
Privacy rights are under assault, but the Supreme Court’s judicial intervention into the issue, starting with Katz v. United States and leading to the Carpenter v. United States decision has created an inconsistent, piecemeal common law of privacy that forestalls a systematic public policy resolution by Congress and the states. In order to reach a satisfactory and longlasting resolution of the problem consistent with separation of powers principles, the states should consider a constitutional amendment that reduces the danger of pervasive technologyaided surveillance and monitoring, together with a series of statutes addressing each new issue posed by technological change as …