Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- United States Supreme Court (366)
- United States. Supreme Court (36)
- Constitutional Law (27)
- Civil Rights (26)
- Supreme Court Justices (23)
-
- United States Constitution 1st Amendment (22)
- Commercial Law (19)
- Criminal Law (19)
- Federalism (19)
- Criminal Procedure (18)
- Judges (17)
- Judicial Review (17)
- Freedom of Speech (16)
- Judicial Process (16)
- Separation of Powers (14)
- Abortion (13)
- Constitutional Interpretation (12)
- Church and State (11)
- Election Law (11)
- John Marshall (10)
- Searches and Seizures (10)
- Affirmative Action (9)
- Book Reviews (9)
- Due Process of Law (9)
- Judicial Power (9)
- United States Constitution 4th Amendment (9)
- W&M Emeriti (9)
- Federal Courts (7)
- Federal Jurisdiction (7)
- Freedom of Religion (7)
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 541 - 570 of 608
Full-Text Articles in Law
Book Review Of The Supreme Court And Constitutional Democracy, Neal Devins
Book Review Of The Supreme Court And Constitutional Democracy, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Righting Past Wrongs: When Affirmative Action May Be Reverse Discrimination, Neal Devins
Righting Past Wrongs: When Affirmative Action May Be Reverse Discrimination, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Possible Final Word On Employment Discrimination Relief, Neal Devins
The Possible Final Word On Employment Discrimination Relief, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court Doctrine In The Trenches: The Case Of Collateral Estoppel, John Bernard Corr
Supreme Court Doctrine In The Trenches: The Case Of Collateral Estoppel, John Bernard Corr
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Book Review Of The Second American Revolution, Neal Devins
Book Review Of The Second American Revolution, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
A Lesson In Incaution, Overwork, And Fatigue: The Judicial Miscraftsmanship Of Segura V. United States, Joshua Dressler
A Lesson In Incaution, Overwork, And Fatigue: The Judicial Miscraftsmanship Of Segura V. United States, Joshua Dressler
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Christmas Without Creches?: Can Private Nativity Scenes Be Banned From Public Land?, Neal Devins
Christmas Without Creches?: Can Private Nativity Scenes Be Banned From Public Land?, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Accommodating Employees' Sabbaths: Is It The Government's Job?, Neal Devins
Accommodating Employees' Sabbaths: Is It The Government's Job?, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Residency Requirements For Attorneys: Home Is Where The License Is?, Neal Devins
Residency Requirements For Attorneys: Home Is Where The License Is?, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
In Re Parochiaid: Church-State Wall Of Separation Scrutinized-Again, Neal Devins
In Re Parochiaid: Church-State Wall Of Separation Scrutinized-Again, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Supreme Court And The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination: Has The Burger Court Retreated?, Paul Marcus
The Supreme Court And The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination: Has The Burger Court Retreated?, Paul Marcus
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Future Of Transferable Development Rights In The Supreme Court, Linda A. Malone
The Future Of Transferable Development Rights In The Supreme Court, Linda A. Malone
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
School Desegregation Law In The 1980'S: The Courts' Abandonment Of Brown V. Board Of Education, Neal Devins
School Desegregation Law In The 1980'S: The Courts' Abandonment Of Brown V. Board Of Education, Neal Devins
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Supreme Court And Private Schools: An Update, Neal Devins
The Supreme Court And Private Schools: An Update, Neal Devins
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
Who Is Injured When Racially Discriminatory Private Schools Are Tax-Exempt?, Neal Devins
Who Is Injured When Racially Discriminatory Private Schools Are Tax-Exempt?, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Diminished Luster In Escambia County?, Neal Devins
Diminished Luster In Escambia County?, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
A New Look At An Old Association: Will Today's Women Be Tomorrow's Jaycees?, Neal Devins
A New Look At An Old Association: Will Today's Women Be Tomorrow's Jaycees?, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Trends In The Supreme Court: Mr. Jefferson’S Crumbling Wall - A Comment On Lynch V. Donnelly, William W. Van Alstyne
Trends In The Supreme Court: Mr. Jefferson’S Crumbling Wall - A Comment On Lynch V. Donnelly, William W. Van Alstyne
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
What Standards Apply When Freedoms Collide?, Neal Devins
What Standards Apply When Freedoms Collide?, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The 1965 Voting Rights Act: Some Wrongs Still Not Righted, Neal Devins
The 1965 Voting Rights Act: Some Wrongs Still Not Righted, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Are Residential Quotas Constitutional?, Neal Devins
Are Residential Quotas Constitutional?, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Your Money Or Your Wife's?: Social Security Changes Considered, Neal Devins
Your Money Or Your Wife's?: Social Security Changes Considered, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Inconsistent Standards Of Review In Last Term's Establishment Clause Cases, Neal Devins
Inconsistent Standards Of Review In Last Term's Establishment Clause Cases, Neal Devins
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
Refining The Lawmaking Function Of The Supreme Court, Frederick Schauer
Refining The Lawmaking Function Of The Supreme Court, Frederick Schauer
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Bob Jones Case - Over To Congress, Neal Devins
The Bob Jones Case - Over To Congress, Neal Devins
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
Book Review Of History Of The Supreme Court Of The United States, Volume Ii, Foundations Of Power: John Marshall, 1801-1815, William F. Swindler
Book Review Of History Of The Supreme Court Of The United States, Volume Ii, Foundations Of Power: John Marshall, 1801-1815, William F. Swindler
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Retroactivity: A Study In Supreme Court Doctrine As Applied, John Bernard Corr
Retroactivity: A Study In Supreme Court Doctrine As Applied, John Bernard Corr
Faculty Publications
The judicial creation of a new rule of law raises the essential question whether that rule is to be applied retroactively orprospectively only. The consistency of the traditionalm andatoryr etroactivityr ule has given way to a more flexible retroactivity ana sis. The change occurred in 1965 when the Supreme Court in Linkletter v. Walker squarelfaced a rule that, if applied retroactively, would have affected thousands of criminal convictions. The Linkletter doctrine has since defined the contours of federal retroactivity ana sis to include three basic considerations: purpose of the rule in question, reliance by theparties on the rule, and effect …
Is The Supreme Court On The Reagan Team?, Neal Devins
Is The Supreme Court On The Reagan Team?, Neal Devins
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
Codifying The First Amendment: New York V. Ferber, Frederick Schauer
Codifying The First Amendment: New York V. Ferber, Frederick Schauer
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Faretta Principle: Self Representation Versus The Right To Counsel, Paul Marcus
The Faretta Principle: Self Representation Versus The Right To Counsel, Paul Marcus
Faculty Publications
The United States Constitution makes provision for criminal defendants to be represented by counsel. In the federal jurisdiction this principle was vigorously applied, even to indigent persons, very early in the Twentieth Century. The United States Supreme Court, however, was reluctant to impose this requirement on the states except in cases of unusual circumstances where the absence of counsel would have affected the basic fairness of the trial. Finally, in a landmark decision by the Supreme Court, it was held that the right to counsel applies in both federal and state cases. For the past twenty years, federal and state …