Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- United States Supreme Court (13)
- Federalism (3)
- Antonin Scalia (1)
- Capital Punishment (1)
- Church and State (1)
-
- Civil Rights (1)
- Commercial Law (1)
- Confirmation Hearings (1)
- Constitutional Interpretation (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Court Administration (1)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- Due Process of Law (1)
- Equal Protection (1)
- Federal Jurisdiction (1)
- Foreign Judgments (1)
- Gideon v. Wainwrights (372 U.S. 335 (1963)) (1)
- Higher Education (1)
- Judicial Power (1)
- Judicial Restraint (1)
- Juvenile Offenders (1)
- Legal Assistance to the Poor (1)
- Legal Education (1)
- Legislative Histories (1)
- Legislative Intent (1)
- Marriage Protection Act of 2004 (Draft) (1)
- Recruiting and Enlistment (1)
- Right to Counsel (1)
- Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic & Institutional Rights (547 U.S. 47 (2006)) (1)
- Separation of Powers (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 17 of 17
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Supreme Court And Foreign Sources Of Law: Two Hundred Years Of Practice And The Juvenile Death Penalty Decision, Steven Calabresi, Stephanie Dotson Zimdahl
The Supreme Court And Foreign Sources Of Law: Two Hundred Years Of Practice And The Juvenile Death Penalty Decision, Steven Calabresi, Stephanie Dotson Zimdahl
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Section 1: Moot Court, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 1: Moot Court, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 10: Miscellaneous, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 10: Miscellaneous, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 3: Confirmation Politics, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 3: Confirmation Politics, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 6: Business Law, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 6: Business Law, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 2: The O'Connor Court, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 2: The O'Connor Court, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 4: Civil Rights, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 4: Civil Rights, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 5: Federalism, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 5: Federalism, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 8: The Rehnquist Court, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 8: The Rehnquist Court, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 9: Looking Ahead, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 9: Looking Ahead, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 7: Criminal Procedure, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 7: Criminal Procedure, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
The Constitutional Limits To Court-Stripping, Michael J. Gerhardt
The Constitutional Limits To Court-Stripping, Michael J. Gerhardt
Faculty Publications
This Article is part of a colloquy between Professor Michael J. Gerhardt and Professor Martin Redish about the constitutionality of court-stripping measures. Court-stripping measures are laws restricting federal court jurisdiction over particular subject matters. In particular, the authors discuss the constitutionality of the Marriage Protection Act of 2004. Professor Gerhardt argues that the Act is unconstitutional and threatens to destroy the principles of separation of powers, federalism and due process. It prevents Supreme Court review of Congressional action and hinders the uniformity and finality of constitutional law. Furthermore, the Act violates the equal protection component of the Fifth Amendment Due …
Reflections On The Teaching Of Constitutional Law, William W. Van Alstyne
Reflections On The Teaching Of Constitutional Law, William W. Van Alstyne
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
A Constitutional Defense Of Legislative History, Paul E. Mcgreal
A Constitutional Defense Of Legislative History, Paul E. Mcgreal
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
The Invisible Pillar Of Gideon, Adam M. Gershowitz
The Invisible Pillar Of Gideon, Adam M. Gershowitz
Faculty Publications
In 1996, the State of South Carolina charged Larry McVay with common-law robbery. McVay, who was employed part-time and took home less than $160 per week after taxes, claimed that after paying his basic living expenses he had no money left with which to hire an attorney. A South Carolina court disagreed and denied McVay’s request for appointed counsel. Seven years later, Scott Peterson was arrested for the murder of his wife and unborn child in California. Although Peterson owned a home, drove an expensive SUV, and was carrying $10,000 in cash when he was captured, he claimed to be …
Bridging The Enforcement Gap In Constitutional Law: A Critique Of The Supreme Court's Theory That Self-Restraint Promotes Federalism, Robert J. Pushaw Jr.
Bridging The Enforcement Gap In Constitutional Law: A Critique Of The Supreme Court's Theory That Self-Restraint Promotes Federalism, Robert J. Pushaw Jr.
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Zelman V. Simmons-Harris, Neal Devins