Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Supreme Court of the United States
University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law
- Keyword
-
- Supreme Court advocacy (19)
- First Supreme Court arguments (15)
- United States Supreme Court (4)
- Justices (3)
- Affirmative action (2)
-
- Congress (2)
- Constitution (2)
- Cooper v. Aaron; judicial supremacy; American Federalism; Little Rock school desegregation; racial integration; US Supreme Court; SCOTUS; rule of law; (2)
- Cooper v. Aaron; republican constitution; constitutional change; Article II; Article IV; constitutional violence; domestic constitutional violence legislation; Duncan v. Kirby; Jackson v. Kuhn; Militia Acts of 1792 and 1795; Insurrection Act of 1807 (2)
- Death penalty (2)
- Judicial review (2)
- Legal history (2)
- Supreme Court (2)
- 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 (1)
- Aesthetic (1)
- Alabama State Troopers (1)
- Amendment (1)
- Analysis (1)
- Antarctica (1)
- Antonin Scalia (1)
- Article III (1)
- Baliles v. Virginia Hospital Association (1)
- Bollinger (1)
- Boundary cases (1)
- Boundary contoversies (1)
- Bronston v. United States (1)
- Caperton v. Massey (1)
- Central Machinery Company v. Arizona State Tax Commission (1)
- Chief Justice Roberts (1)
- Citizens United v. FEC (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 38
Full-Text Articles in Law
“Remarkable Influence”: The Unexpected Importance Of Justice Scalia's Deceptively Unanimous And Contested Majority Opinions, Linda L. Berger, Eric C. Nystrom
“Remarkable Influence”: The Unexpected Importance Of Justice Scalia's Deceptively Unanimous And Contested Majority Opinions, Linda L. Berger, Eric C. Nystrom
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Judicial Supremacy In A Federalism Context Through The Lens Of Cooper, Joel K. Goldstein
Judicial Supremacy In A Federalism Context Through The Lens Of Cooper, Joel K. Goldstein
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Domestic Constitutional Violence, F. E. Guerra-Pujol
Domestic Constitutional Violence, F. E. Guerra-Pujol
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Supremacy In A Federalism Context Through The Lens Of Cooper, Joel K. Goldstein
Judicial Supremacy In A Federalism Context Through The Lens Of Cooper, Joel K. Goldstein
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Domestic Constitutional Violence, F. E. Guerra-Pujol
Domestic Constitutional Violence, F. E. Guerra-Pujol
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Behind The Velvet Curtain: Understanding Supreme Court Conference Discussions Through Justices' Personal Conference Notes, Ryan C. Black, Timothy R. Johnson
Behind The Velvet Curtain: Understanding Supreme Court Conference Discussions Through Justices' Personal Conference Notes, Ryan C. Black, Timothy R. Johnson
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
The Supreme Court—Then And Now, Jon O. Newman
The Supreme Court—Then And Now, Jon O. Newman
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
My First Supreme Court Argument . . . And Then What Happened, Adam G. Unikowsky
My First Supreme Court Argument . . . And Then What Happened, Adam G. Unikowsky
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Disrespectful Dissent: Justice Scalia's Regrettable Legacy Of Incivility, J. Lyn Entrikin
Disrespectful Dissent: Justice Scalia's Regrettable Legacy Of Incivility, J. Lyn Entrikin
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Original Intent: Understanding The Supreme Court's Original Jurisdiction In Controversies Between States, Kristen A. Linsley
Original Intent: Understanding The Supreme Court's Original Jurisdiction In Controversies Between States, Kristen A. Linsley
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Procuring ‘Justice’?: Citizens United, Caperton, And Partisan Judicial Elections, André Douglas Pond Cummings
Procuring ‘Justice’?: Citizens United, Caperton, And Partisan Judicial Elections, André Douglas Pond Cummings
Faculty Scholarship
In recent years, two inextricably connected issues have received a great deal of attention in both United States political discourse and in the legal academic literature. One issue of intense legal debate and frustration has been that of judicial recusal, including an examination of the appropriate standards that should necessarily apply to judges that seem conflicted or biased in their role as neutral arbiter. A second issue that has spawned heated commentary and great dispute over the past decade is that of campaign finance law, including examination of the role that powerful and wealthy benefactors play in American electioneering. Both …
Crawford, Retroactivity, And The Importance Of Being Earnest, J. Thomas Sullivan
Crawford, Retroactivity, And The Importance Of Being Earnest, J. Thomas Sullivan
Faculty Scholarship
In this article Professor Sullivan examines the Supreme Court's evolving Confrontation Clause jurisprudence through its dramatic return to pre-Sixth Amendment appreciation of the role of cross-examination in the criminal trial reflected in its 2004 decision in Crawford v. Washington. He discusses the past quarter century of the Court's confrontation decisions and their impact on his client, Ralph Rodney Earnest, recounting the defendant's conviction and twenty-four-year litigation journey through state and federal courts to his eventual release from prison in the only successful attempt to use Crawford retroactively known to date.
Grutter V. Bollinger, Clarence Thomas, Affirmative Action And The Treachery Of Originalism: "The Sun Don't Shine Here In This Part Of Town", André Douglas Pond Cummings
Grutter V. Bollinger, Clarence Thomas, Affirmative Action And The Treachery Of Originalism: "The Sun Don't Shine Here In This Part Of Town", André Douglas Pond Cummings
Faculty Scholarship
Careful examination of Justice Clarence Thomas's dissenting opinion in the landmark affirmative action case Grutter v. Bollinger is important for a number of reasons: First, as one of the youngest members of the U.S. Supreme Court, Thomas stands a reasonable chance of still being a member of the court in 25 years, the self imposed implosion date (sunset provision) established by Justice O'Connor's majority opinion. No doubt, Thomas relishes the idea of writing the majority opinion that kills affirmative action and racial preferences for good.
Second, much as Justice Harlan's dissenting opinion in Plessy v. Ferguson was used as a …
Now And Then At The Supreme Court, Nancy Bellhouse May, Nancy May
Now And Then At The Supreme Court, Nancy Bellhouse May, Nancy May
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Preface, David C. Frederick
Preface, David C. Frederick
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Go East, Young Lawyers: The Stanford Law School Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, Pamela S. Karlan, Thomas C. Goldstein
Go East, Young Lawyers: The Stanford Law School Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, Pamela S. Karlan, Thomas C. Goldstein
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Dress Rehearsal: The Moot Court Program At Georgetown Law Center's Supreme Court Institute, Gregory J. Langlois
Dress Rehearsal: The Moot Court Program At Georgetown Law Center's Supreme Court Institute, Gregory J. Langlois
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Avoiding Missteps In The Supreme Court: A Guide To Resources For Counsel, Charles A. Rothfeld
Avoiding Missteps In The Supreme Court: A Guide To Resources For Counsel, Charles A. Rothfeld
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
A Rarefied Kind Of Dread, David I. Bruck
A Rarefied Kind Of Dread, David I. Bruck
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Preface, Nancy Bellhouse May
Preface, Nancy Bellhouse May
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
A First Argument In The Tradition Of Many, Beth S. Brinkmann
A First Argument In The Tradition Of Many, Beth S. Brinkmann
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Pretender In Paradise, J. Richard Cohen
Pretender In Paradise, J. Richard Cohen
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
First Argument In The United States Supreme Court, Talbot D'Alemberte
First Argument In The United States Supreme Court, Talbot D'Alemberte
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Why Me?, Walter Dellinger
Why Me?, Walter Dellinger
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
I Couldn't Wait To Argue, Timothy Coates
I Couldn't Wait To Argue, Timothy Coates
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
A Chilly Reception At The Court, David J. Bederman
A Chilly Reception At The Court, David J. Bederman
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Learning (And Teaching) From Doing, Edward B. Foley
Learning (And Teaching) From Doing, Edward B. Foley
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Still Grateful After All These Years, Christina M. Tchen
Still Grateful After All These Years, Christina M. Tchen
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Tilting At Windmills, Andrew L. Frey
Tilting At Windmills, Andrew L. Frey
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
First Argument Impressions Of The Supreme Court, Stuart M. Riback
First Argument Impressions Of The Supreme Court, Stuart M. Riback
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.