Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 96
Full-Text Articles in Law
Coloring Inside The Lines: A Look At Qualitex V. Jacobson, 21 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 49 (2022), Willajeanne Mclean
Coloring Inside The Lines: A Look At Qualitex V. Jacobson, 21 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 49 (2022), Willajeanne Mclean
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Symposium On The Retirement Of Justice Stephen Breyer, 21 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 35 (2022), William Ford
Symposium On The Retirement Of Justice Stephen Breyer, 21 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 35 (2022), William Ford
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
A La Recherche De Breyer Perdu, 21 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 38 (2022), Shubha Ghosh
A La Recherche De Breyer Perdu, 21 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 38 (2022), Shubha Ghosh
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Justice Breyer And Patent Eligibility, 21 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 71 (2022), David Taylor
Justice Breyer And Patent Eligibility, 21 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 71 (2022), David Taylor
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Justice Breyer: No Friend To Ip Law, 21 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 58 (2022), Kevin Noonan
Justice Breyer: No Friend To Ip Law, 21 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 58 (2022), Kevin Noonan
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Twenty-First Century Supreme Court Retirees: Assessing The Propriety Of Post-Retirement Activities, 54 Uic L. Rev. 829 (2021), Christopher Smith
Twenty-First Century Supreme Court Retirees: Assessing The Propriety Of Post-Retirement Activities, 54 Uic L. Rev. 829 (2021), Christopher Smith
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Justice Anthony Kennedy As Senior Associate Justice: Influence And Impact, 53 Uic J. Marshall L. Rev. 907 (2019), Charles Jacob, Christopher Smith
Justice Anthony Kennedy As Senior Associate Justice: Influence And Impact, 53 Uic J. Marshall L. Rev. 907 (2019), Charles Jacob, Christopher Smith
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Supreme Court: A Help Or A Hindrance To The Federal Circuit's Mission?, 17 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 298 (2018), Donald Dunner
The Supreme Court: A Help Or A Hindrance To The Federal Circuit's Mission?, 17 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 298 (2018), Donald Dunner
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Before the establishment of the Federal Circuit, the system of patent enforcement was deeply flawed, with the circuit courts then responsible for reviewing district court patent decisions harboring widely varying attitudinal views in the interpretation of the patent law. Suggestions for solving the problem through a single specialized appellate patent court were consistently rejected due to general hostility to specialized courts. The formation of the Federal Circuit in 1982 initially appeared to solve the problem in providing uniform and predictable rules governing the enforcement of patents, an essential aspect of the court’s mission. The Supreme Court did not provide any …
Navigating The Rubicon: Constitutionalism And The Inevitability Of The Social Contract, 51 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (2017), Lillian M. Spiess
Navigating The Rubicon: Constitutionalism And The Inevitability Of The Social Contract, 51 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (2017), Lillian M. Spiess
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Corporation In The Marketplace Of Ideas, 51 J. Marshall L. Rev. 19 (2017), Matthew Telleen
The Corporation In The Marketplace Of Ideas, 51 J. Marshall L. Rev. 19 (2017), Matthew Telleen
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Amici Curiae In The United States Supreme Court And The Australian High Court: A Lesson In Balancing Amicability, 51 J. Marshall L. Rev. 81 (2017), Benjamin Robert Hopper
Amici Curiae In The United States Supreme Court And The Australian High Court: A Lesson In Balancing Amicability, 51 J. Marshall L. Rev. 81 (2017), Benjamin Robert Hopper
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Samsung V. Apple, Life Technologies V. Promega, Sca Hygiene Products V. First Quality Baby Products, Tc Heartland V. Kraft, Impression Products V. Lexmark, And Sandoz V. Amgen: The U.S. Supreme Court Decides Six Patent Cases In 2016-17, 17 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 162 (2017), Sue Ann Ganske
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
The United States Supreme Court decided six very important patent cases in the 2016-17 term, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Apple Inc., called the “design patent case of the century,” Life Technologies Corp. v. Promega Corp., an international supply chain patent case, SCA Hygiene Products v. First Quality Baby Products, LLC, where the doctrine of laches was not a defense in a patent infringement case, TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC, which dealt with patent venue statute, Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc., which held that the authorized first sale of a patented item exhausts the …
Implicit In The Concept Of Ordered Liberty: How Obergefell V. Hodges Illuminates The Modern Substantive Due Process Debate, 49 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1021 (2016), Matthew Grothouse
Implicit In The Concept Of Ordered Liberty: How Obergefell V. Hodges Illuminates The Modern Substantive Due Process Debate, 49 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1021 (2016), Matthew Grothouse
UIC Law Review
This Article uses the historical sweep of the Due Process Clause to evaluate the merits of Obergefell’s majority and dissenting opinions. Specifically, the Article explains why the Due Process Clause’s prohibition on arbitrary punishments in general—and legislative judgments in particular—invariably mandates the judicial nullification of arbitrary and irrational legislative acts. What exactly constitutes a “legislative judgment” and how much deference courts should exercise in examining legislative acts are the crucial and largely unanswered questions lying at the heart of the Obergefell case (and in substantive due process cases in general). Although the Obergefell Court’s discussion focuses on a single case, …
The Call And The Response: The Call, The 1991 Open Letter From Federal Judge A. Leon Higginbotham, Jr., And The 25 Years Of Response From Justice Clarence Thomas, 49 J. Marshall L. Rev. 925 (2016), Angela Mae Kupenda
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Out Of Touch: Shelby V. Holder And The Callous Effects Of Chief Justice Roberts’S Equal State Sovereignty, 49 J. Marshall L. Rev. 751 (2016), Adam Bolotin
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court Leaks And Recusals: A Response To Professor Steven Lubet’S Scotus Ethics In The Wake Of Nfib V. Sebelius, 47 Val. U. L. Rev. 925 (2013), Kevin Hopkins
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
As Professor Steven Lubet notes in his article, Stonewalling, Leaks, and Counter-Leaks: SCOTUS Ethics in the Wake of NFIB v. Sebelius, the ethical conduct of Supreme Court Justices has once again gained national attention. This time, however, the context for public outcry is due to actions of an in-house source who released confidential information to a member of the press concerning the voting behavior and the overall sentiments of members of the Court's minority in one of the most significant and controversial rulings of the year: NFIB v. Sebelius (the "Affordable Care Act"). Professor Lubet uses this leaking of significant …
Clever Contraband: Why Illinois’ Lockstep With The U.S. Supreme Court Gives Police Authority To Search The Bowels Of Your Vehicle, 47 J. Marshall L. Rev. 425 (2013), Jason Cooper
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Reverse Payment Settlements: The U.S. Supreme Court Has Finally Agreed To Resolve The Issue, 12 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 787 (2013), Tyler Cho
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Paragraph IV of the Hatch-Waxman Act provides a mechanism for litigating pharmaceutical patent infringement disputes. Many of these cases have been settled with “reverse payments” from the brand to the generic in return for delayed generic entry. The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has contested a number of these settlements with mixed results. On July 16, 2012, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued a decision holding that pharmaceutical patent settlements that restrict generic entry and contain a payment to the generic company are presumptively unlawful under U.S. antitrust laws. By holding that a patent settlement can …
Session I: The Legacy Of Justice Arthur Goldberg, 29 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 285 (2012), Samuel R. Olken, Gerald Berendt, Gilbert A. Cornfield, Gilbert Feldman, David Stebenne, Milton I. Shadur
Session I: The Legacy Of Justice Arthur Goldberg, 29 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 285 (2012), Samuel R. Olken, Gerald Berendt, Gilbert A. Cornfield, Gilbert Feldman, David Stebenne, Milton I. Shadur
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
How The Supreme Court And The Department Of Labor May Dispel Myths About Erisa's Family Law Provisions And Protect The Benefit Entitlements That Arise Thereunder, 45 J. Marshall L. Rev. 635 (2012), Albert Feuer
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Foreword: The Past, Present, And Future Of Supreme Court Jurisprudence On Erisa, 45 J. Marshall L. Rev. Xxv (2012), Colleen E. Medill
Foreword: The Past, Present, And Future Of Supreme Court Jurisprudence On Erisa, 45 J. Marshall L. Rev. Xxv (2012), Colleen E. Medill
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Supreme Court Fills A Gaping Hole: Cigna Corp. V. Amara Clarifies The Scope Of Equitable Relief Under Erisa, 45 J. Marshall L. Rev. 767 (2012), Susan Harthill
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rid Of Habeas Corpus - How Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel Has Endangered Access To The Writ Of Habeas Corpus And What The Supreme Court Can Do In Maples And Martinez To Restore It, 45 Creighton L. Rev. 185 (2011), Hugh Mundy
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
In Order To Be Silent, You Must First Speak: The Supreme Court Extends Davis's Clarity Requirement To The Right To Remain Silent In Berghuis V. Thompkins, 44 J. Marshall L. Rev. 423 (2011), Harvey Gee
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Justice Sutherland Reconsidered, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 639 (2009), Samuel R. Olken
Justice Sutherland Reconsidered, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 639 (2009), Samuel R. Olken
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Dedication Of Issue To Chief Justice Thomas R. Fitzgerald, 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. Xxiii (2009), Editorial Board 2008-2009
Dedication Of Issue To Chief Justice Thomas R. Fitzgerald, 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. Xxiii (2009), Editorial Board 2008-2009
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Case Note: Golden Gate Restaurant Association V. City And County Of San Francisco: Setting The Stage For Supreme Court Review Of The Most Important Preemption Matter In The History Of Erisa, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 995 (2008), Joshua Waldbeser
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
An Empirical Analysis Of The Confirmation Hearings Of The Justices Of The Rehnquist Natural Court, 24 Const. Comment. 127 (2007), Jason J. Czarnezki, William K. Ford, Lori A. Ringhand
An Empirical Analysis Of The Confirmation Hearings Of The Justices Of The Rehnquist Natural Court, 24 Const. Comment. 127 (2007), Jason J. Czarnezki, William K. Ford, Lori A. Ringhand
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
"The Stepford Justices": The Need For Experiential Diversity On The Roberts Court, 60 Okla. L. Rev. 701 (2007), Timothy P. O'Neill
"The Stepford Justices": The Need For Experiential Diversity On The Roberts Court, 60 Okla. L. Rev. 701 (2007), Timothy P. O'Neill
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Color Of Perspective: Affirmative Action And The Constitutional Rhetoric Of White Innocence, 11 Mich. J. Race & L. 477 (2006), Cecil J. Hunt Ii
The Color Of Perspective: Affirmative Action And The Constitutional Rhetoric Of White Innocence, 11 Mich. J. Race & L. 477 (2006), Cecil J. Hunt Ii
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
This Article discusses the Supreme Court's use of the rhetoric of White innocence in deciding racially-inflected claims of constitutional shelter. It argues that the Court's use of this rhetoric reveals its adoption of a distinctly White-centered perspective, representing a one-sided view of racial reality that distorts the Court's ability to accurately appreciate the true nature of racial reality in contemporary America. This Article examines the Court's habit of using a White-centered perspective in constitutional race cases. Specifically, it looks at the Court's use of the rhetoric of White innocence in the context of the Court's concern with protecting "innocent" Whites …