Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Appointment (2)
- Campaign (2)
- Candidate (2)
- Abortion (1)
- Abstention (1)
-
- Advisor (1)
- Appointed (1)
- Appointing (1)
- Appointive (1)
- Arizona (1)
- Barrett (1)
- CDC (1)
- Confirmation (1)
- Diversity (1)
- Elected (1)
- Electing (1)
- Election (1)
- Electioneering (1)
- Electoral (1)
- Electorate (1)
- FRCP (1)
- Fund-raising (1)
- Governor (1)
- Harris (1)
- Health (1)
- Hyper-democracy (1)
- Interest group (1)
- Introduction (1)
- John Oakley (1)
- Judicial candidate (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Law
Judicial Selection And Evaluation, Center For Democratic Culture At Unlv
Judicial Selection And Evaluation, Center For Democratic Culture At Unlv
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Malignant Democracy: Core Fallacies Underlying Election Of The Judiciary, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Malignant Democracy: Core Fallacies Underlying Election Of The Judiciary, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Public Financing Of Judicial Campaigns: Practices And Prospects , Michael W. Bowers
Public Financing Of Judicial Campaigns: Practices And Prospects , Michael W. Bowers
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Remedying Judicial Foot-In-Mouth Disease: Nevada's Prohibitions Against Judicial Commentary On Evidence And The Rule Of Harmless Error, Andrew F. Dixon
Remedying Judicial Foot-In-Mouth Disease: Nevada's Prohibitions Against Judicial Commentary On Evidence And The Rule Of Harmless Error, Andrew F. Dixon
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Ninth Circuit's Message To Nevada: You're Not Getting Any Younger, Kevin Beck
The Ninth Circuit's Message To Nevada: You're Not Getting Any Younger, Kevin Beck
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Malignant Democracy: Core Fallacies Underlying Election Of The Judiciary, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Malignant Democracy: Core Fallacies Underlying Election Of The Judiciary, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Scholarly Works
There is no requirement of democratic theory that mandates that all public offices be filled by election. This is particularly true in modern democratic states, which are simply too large to justify the administrative burden of electing everyone who has significant responsibilities in our society.
Examples of this are everywhere in modern democracies, such as the United States and Europe. In England, for example, the Prime Minister is not directly elected by the people. Does this mean Great Britain has ceased to be a democracy? In most large, sophisticated nation-states, national cabinet officers have great power but are the political …
Note, A Woman’S Life, A Woman’S Health: Equalizing Medicaid Abortion Funding In Simat Corp. V. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System, Sara Gordon
Scholarly Works
This casenote discusses the Arizona Supreme Court’s decision in Simat Corp. v. Arizona Health Care Cost Container System. In a decision deviating from those of the United States Supreme Court, the Arizona Supreme Court declared the Arizona statute and accompanying Arizona Heath Care Cost Containment System provisions unconstitutional because they did not survive strict scrutiny analysis under the Privileges and Immunities Clause of the Arizona Constitution. Where the state of Arizona has undertaken to fund abortions for indigent women whose lives are directly threatened by pregnancy, it cannot refuse to pay for abortions for similarly indigent women whose health, …
The Past And Future Of The Federal Rules In State Courts, Carl Tobias
The Past And Future Of The Federal Rules In State Courts, Carl Tobias
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
A Fresh Look At The Federal Rules In State Courts, John B. Oakley
A Fresh Look At The Federal Rules In State Courts, John B. Oakley
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.