Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- St. Mary's University (26)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (17)
- UIC School of Law (9)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (8)
- Seattle University School of Law (6)
-
- University of Michigan Law School (6)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (4)
- Brigham Young University Law School (3)
- Lewis & Clark Law School (3)
- University of Richmond (3)
- William & Mary Law School (3)
- Cleveland State University (2)
- New York Law School (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (1)
- Mercer University School of Law (1)
- North Carolina Central University School of Law (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (1)
- University of Colorado Law School (1)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (1)
- University of New Hampshire (1)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (1)
- West Virginia University (1)
- Keyword
-
- St. Mary’s Law Journal (20)
- St. Mary’s University School of Law (20)
- Death Penalty (6)
- Inc. (6)
- MASSACHUSETTS (6)
-
- Student comment (5)
- CAPITAL punishment (4)
- Animal law (3)
- Capital Punishment (3)
- Democracy (3)
- Federal government (3)
- Fifth Amendment (3)
- Law (3)
- Massachusetts Governor's Council Report (3)
- Texas Supreme Court (3)
- Voting Rights (3)
- Aggravator Creep (2)
- Attorney’s fees (2)
- Capital punishment (2)
- Cherokee nation (2)
- Companion animals (2)
- Death Penalty Reform (2)
- Death Qualification (2)
- Electoral Process (2)
- Eminent domain (2)
- Empirical studies (2)
- Exemplary damages (2)
- Expert testimony (2)
- Fairness (2)
- Felon Disenfranchisement (2)
- Publication
-
- St. Mary's Law Journal (26)
- Indiana Law Journal (17)
- UIC Law Review (9)
- William Mitchell Law Review (8)
- Seattle University Law Review (6)
-
- American Indian Law Review (3)
- Animal Law Review (3)
- BYU Law Review (3)
- Michigan Law Review (3)
- University of Richmond Law Review (3)
- William & Mary Law Review (3)
- Cleveland State Law Review (2)
- NYLS Law Review (2)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (2)
- American University Law Review (1)
- Maryland Law Review (1)
- Mercer Law Review (1)
- Michigan Journal of Gender & Law (1)
- Nevada Law Journal (1)
- North Carolina Central Law Review (1)
- Oklahoma Law Review (1)
- Public Interest Law Reporter (1)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (1)
- The University of New Hampshire Law Review (1)
- University of Colorado Law Review (1)
- Villanova Law Review (1)
- West Virginia Law Review (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 103
Full-Text Articles in Law
Local Government Law, R. Perry Sentell Jr.
Local Government Law, R. Perry Sentell Jr.
Mercer Law Review
As a county attorney, I was involved in a zoning case.... One day, ... the judge summoned all of us to his chambers for a conference concerning the case. As we sat around his conference table, his law clerk brought in the accumulated papers in the case. The papers were then placed in two stacks: one stack originating from the landowner's attorneys, and the other from us. The judge then brought out a ruler and measured the two stacks. He then turned to the landowner's attorney and said, "Mr. Attorney, you have exceeded 12 inches. I will receive and consider …
Acknowledgments, R. Kennon Poteat
Acknowledgments, R. Kennon Poteat
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Deterrence Versus Brutalization: Capital Punishment's Differing Impacts Among States, Joanna M. Shepherd
Deterrence Versus Brutalization: Capital Punishment's Differing Impacts Among States, Joanna M. Shepherd
Michigan Law Review
Policymakers' false beliefs about capital punishment's universal deterrent effect may have caused many people to die needlessly. If deterrence is capital punishment's purpose then, in the majority of states where executions do not deter crime, executions kill convicts uselessly. Moreover, in the many states where the brutalization effect outweighs the deterrent effect, executions not only kill convicts needlessly but also induce the additional murders of many innocent people. After Part II discusses capital punishment's recent history in the United States, Part III reviews the conflict in recent studies on capital punishment and deterrence. Part IV explores differences in states' applications …
Pre-Argument Settlement At The Michigan Court Of Appeals: A Secret Too Well Kept, Jeremy L. Fetty
Pre-Argument Settlement At The Michigan Court Of Appeals: A Secret Too Well Kept, Jeremy L. Fetty
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Ohio Issue 1 Is Unconstitutional, Wilson Huhn
Ohio Issue 1 Is Unconstitutional, Wilson Huhn
North Carolina Central Law Review
No abstract provided.
Justice Miriam Shearing: Nevada's Trailblazing Minimalist, Mary Berkheiser
Justice Miriam Shearing: Nevada's Trailblazing Minimalist, Mary Berkheiser
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Are State Marriage Amendments Bills Of Attainder?: A Case Study Of Utah's Amendment Three, Daniel H. Walker
Are State Marriage Amendments Bills Of Attainder?: A Case Study Of Utah's Amendment Three, Daniel H. Walker
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Considerations For Local Government Reform In West Virginia, Robert M. Bastress Jr.
Constitutional Considerations For Local Government Reform In West Virginia, Robert M. Bastress Jr.
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Determining When Two Offenses Are The Same Under Indiana's Criminal Rule 4, Howard W. Anderson Iii
Determining When Two Offenses Are The Same Under Indiana's Criminal Rule 4, Howard W. Anderson Iii
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Examining The Underlying Purposes Of Municipal And Statewide Smoking Bans, Mark J. Horvick
Examining The Underlying Purposes Of Municipal And Statewide Smoking Bans, Mark J. Horvick
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Market For Criminal Justice: Federalism, Crime Control, And Jurisdictional Competition, Doron Teichman
The Market For Criminal Justice: Federalism, Crime Control, And Jurisdictional Competition, Doron Teichman
Michigan Law Review
Part I introduces the concepts of jurisdictional competition and crime displacement and argues that, as a positive matter, a decentralized criminal justice system may create a competitive process among the different units composing it, in which each such unit attempts to divert crime to neighboring communities. Part II then turns to evaluate the normative aspects of jurisdictional competition in the area of criminal justice. In this context I will show that competition can have both advantages and disadvantages. On one hand, the forces of competition might drive jurisdictions to fight crime efficiently, since any jurisdiction that functions inefficiently will suffer …
Subdivisions, Standing And The Supremacy Clause: Can A Political Subdivision Sue Its Parent State Under Federal Law, Brian P. Keenan
Subdivisions, Standing And The Supremacy Clause: Can A Political Subdivision Sue Its Parent State Under Federal Law, Brian P. Keenan
Michigan Law Review
This Note argues that political subdivisions should be able to seek protection from their parent states under the Supremacy Clause when alleging a conflict between state law and any federal law, be it the Constitution, treaty, or a federal statute. Part I argues that the precedential cases like Hunter and Trenton were limited to the constitutional provisions in question and therefore did not bar all suits under the Supremacy Clause. Part II shows that the issue is one of constitutional protection of political subdivisions, rather than Article III standing, which had a completely different meaning when Hunter and Trenton were …
States’ Rights And The Scope Of The Treaty Power: Could The Patriot Act Be Constitutional As A Treaty?, Simcha Herzog
States’ Rights And The Scope Of The Treaty Power: Could The Patriot Act Be Constitutional As A Treaty?, Simcha Herzog
The University of New Hampshire Law Review
[Excerpt] “Consider the following hypothetical scenario: after an appeal by the American Civil Liberties Union, the Supreme Court determines that the Patriot Act is unconstitutional. This decision so infuriates President Bush that he seeks out the advice of his legal counsel in a frantic attempt to bypass the Court’s ruling. After some research, President Bush’s legal advisers give him two options: he can either attempt to pass an amendment to the constitution or, with the “advice and consent of the Senate,” he can sign the Patriot Act as a treaty with a foreign nation. Either of these measures will evade …
University Of Richmond Law Review Index Volume Xxxix 2004-2005
University Of Richmond Law Review Index Volume Xxxix 2004-2005
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Contract Theory In Nineteenth-Century Indiana Courts: An Argument For Non-Bargain Based Promissory Liability, Paul Dubbeling
Contract Theory In Nineteenth-Century Indiana Courts: An Argument For Non-Bargain Based Promissory Liability, Paul Dubbeling
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Battle Over Control Of Low-Level Radioactive Waste: Some States Are Overstepping Their Bounds, Melissa Beutler Orien
Battle Over Control Of Low-Level Radioactive Waste: Some States Are Overstepping Their Bounds, Melissa Beutler Orien
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Salvaging States' Rights To Protect Children From Internet Predation: State Power To Regulate Internet Activity Under The Dormant Commerce Clause, Julie Sorenson Stanger
Salvaging States' Rights To Protect Children From Internet Predation: State Power To Regulate Internet Activity Under The Dormant Commerce Clause, Julie Sorenson Stanger
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Foreword: The New Frontier Of State Constitutional Law, James A. Gardner, Jim Rossi
Foreword: The New Frontier Of State Constitutional Law, James A. Gardner, Jim Rossi
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
In A Federal Case, Is The State Constitution Something Important Or Just Another Piece Of Paper?, Randall T. Shepard
In A Federal Case, Is The State Constitution Something Important Or Just Another Piece Of Paper?, Randall T. Shepard
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Whose Constitution Is It? Why Federalism And Constitutional Positivism Don't Mix, James A. Gardner
Whose Constitution Is It? Why Federalism And Constitutional Positivism Don't Mix, James A. Gardner
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
State Legislation And Human Trafficking: Helpful Or Harmful?, Stephanie Richard
State Legislation And Human Trafficking: Helpful Or Harmful?, Stephanie Richard
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Human trafficking is the modern day form of slavery. Despite the fact that thousands of people are trafficked into the United Sates each year, the majority of U.S. citizens are not aware of the nature and extent of this problem. In 2000, the U.S. government passed the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act (VTVPA) to combat this grave human rights abuse. This federal legislation takes a comprehensive approach to addressing the problem of human trafficking in the United States by acknowledging that effective prosecution cannot occur without safeguards and benefits for trafficking victims. To this end, the VTVPA enumerates …
State Sentencing Policy And New Prison Admissions, Ben Trachtenberg
State Sentencing Policy And New Prison Admissions, Ben Trachtenberg
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
As the academy's focus has turned to sentencing in the wake of Blakely v. Washington and United States v. Booker, most commentators have continued their benign neglect of actual sentencing practices as they occur in state courts, not to mention whether and how such policies are effective in achieving the goals of criminal justice.
This Note examines trends in state sentencing policies and prison populations from the perspective of a would-be state reformer hoping to decrease her state's prison budget. Economic pressures, efficiency arguments, and social justice claims have combined to cause some states to desire lower prison populations, …
In Re M.J.J., J.P.L., & J.P.G: The "Qualified Expert Witness" Requirements Of The Indian Child Welfare Act, Paul David Kouri
In Re M.J.J., J.P.L., & J.P.G: The "Qualified Expert Witness" Requirements Of The Indian Child Welfare Act, Paul David Kouri
American Indian Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Passage Of Community Property Laws, 1939-1947: Was "More Than Money" Involved?, Jennifer E. Sturiale
The Passage Of Community Property Laws, 1939-1947: Was "More Than Money" Involved?, Jennifer E. Sturiale
Michigan Journal of Gender & Law
Part I of this article reviews the legal landscape that provided the backdrop against which Michigan, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Oregon, and Pennsylvania later adopted community property laws. It also examines the tax consequences of the two Supreme Court cases, Lucas v. Earl and Poe v. Seaborn, that resulted in the disparate tax treatment of married couples in common law and community property law states. Part II briefly reviews the subsequent passage of community property laws by Michigan, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Oregon, and Pennsylvania; the passage of a federal tax reduction bill that provided for equal treatment of community property law and …
Minnesota: Leading The Way On Canadian Prescription Medicine Importation, Kevin Goodno, Karen Janisch
Minnesota: Leading The Way On Canadian Prescription Medicine Importation, Kevin Goodno, Karen Janisch
William Mitchell Law Review
In the United States, about $160 billion is spent on prescription medicines each year, with Minnesotans spending about $3 billion. The costs of prescription medicines receive so much attention in large part because, although prescription medicine costs constitute only 10.5% of total health care spending, they account for 23% of the total out-of-pocket costs that people incur when purchasing health care. Minnesota has been a leader in controlling prescription medicine costs. It has aggressively used purchasing pools when possible, and encouraged the use of lower cost, generic prescription medicines when appropriate. Even with these efforts to control costs, prescription medicines …
Aetna V. Davila/Cigna V. Calad: A Missed Opportunity, Leonard A. Nelson
Aetna V. Davila/Cigna V. Calad: A Missed Opportunity, Leonard A. Nelson
William Mitchell Law Review
On June 21, 2004, the United States Supreme Court decided the health law “case of the year” in the two consolidated cases of Aetna Health, Inc. v. Davila and CIGNA HealthCare of Texas, Inc. v. Calad. The Court held that section 502(a) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) “completely preempt[s]” and thus invalidates the tort liability provisions of the Texas Health Care Liability Act (THCLA). The case could potentially affect the rights of millions of Americans in a matter of vital concern—whether they will receive the health insurance coverage promised them if they become unable to …
Revoke First, Ask Questions Later: Challenging Minnesota’S Unconstitutional Pre-Hearing Revocation Scheme, Jeffrey S. Sheridan, Erika Burkhart Booth
Revoke First, Ask Questions Later: Challenging Minnesota’S Unconstitutional Pre-Hearing Revocation Scheme, Jeffrey S. Sheridan, Erika Burkhart Booth
William Mitchell Law Review
This analysis of the constitutionality of Minnesota’s prehearing revocation scheme begins by explaining the mechanics of Minnesota’s implied consent statute. Because the United States Supreme Court has established minimum procedural due process protections that must be afforded drivers, this backdrop is examined. After considering the federal standards for procedural due process, the numerous changes to Minnesota’s implied consent statute will be addressed. Next, the current challenge will be discussed, including the factual basis for the challenge, the arguments for the statute’s unconstitutionality, and the district court’s decision. Finally, this note will conclude that, given the dramatic increase in the private …
Note: The Legislature Should Clean Up Its Act—The Minnesota Citizens’ Personal Protection Act, A Dnr Technical Bill, And The Single-Subject And Title Clause Of The Minnesota Constitution, Melissa M. Milbert
William Mitchell Law Review
This note explores the Ramsey County District Court’s decision in Unity Church v. Minnesota recently affirmed by the Minnesota Court of Appeals. This note does not, however, debate the merits of Minnesota’s conceal-and-carry law. Part II traces the legislative path taken by both the natural resource and conceal-and-carry bills. Part II surveys the history of the single-subject and title clause of the Minnesota Constitution and the evolution of the Minnesota Supreme Court’s interpretation of the clause since its enactment. Part III summarizes the factual and procedural posture of the Unity Church decision. Part IV then contends that the legislature’s enactment …
Federal And State Laws Improve Sex Offender Registry, Andrea Binion
Federal And State Laws Improve Sex Offender Registry, Andrea Binion
Public Interest Law Reporter
No abstract provided.