Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Abolition (1)
- Badges and incidents of slavery (1)
- Civil war (1)
- Congruence and proportionality (1)
- Discrimination (1)
-
- Equal Protection Clause (1)
- Equal protection (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Gender equity (1)
- Hostile environment (1)
- Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. (1)
- Marbury (1)
- McCulloch (1)
- Necessary and proper (1)
- Peer sexual harassment (1)
- Race (1)
- Racial profiling (1)
- School liability (1)
- Sexual harassment (1)
- Slavery (1)
- Student harasser (1)
- Thirteenth Amendment (1)
- Title IX (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Perceiving Subtle Sexism: Mapping The Social-Psychological Forces And Legal Narratives That Obscure Gender Bias, Deborah L. Brake
Perceiving Subtle Sexism: Mapping The Social-Psychological Forces And Legal Narratives That Obscure Gender Bias, Deborah L. Brake
Articles
This essay seeks to explain the Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education case as an interpretation of discrimination that notably and correctly focuses on how institutions cause sex-based harm, rather than on whether officials within chosen institutions act with a discriminatory intent. In the process, I discuss what appears to be the implicit theory of discrimination underlying the Davis decision: that schools cause the discrimination by exacerbating the harm that results from sexual harassment by students. I then explore the significance of the deliberate indifference requirement in this context, concluding that the standard, for all its flaws, is distinct …
Judicial Review Of Thirteenth Amendment Legislation: 'Congruence And Proportionality' Or 'Necessary And Proper'?, William M. Carter Jr.
Judicial Review Of Thirteenth Amendment Legislation: 'Congruence And Proportionality' Or 'Necessary And Proper'?, William M. Carter Jr.
Articles
The Thirteenth Amendment has relatively recently been rediscovered by scholars and litigants as a source of civil rights protections. Most of the scholarship focuses on judicial enforcement of the Amendment in lawsuits brought by individuals. However, scholars have paid relatively little attention as of late to the proper scope of congressional action enforcing the Amendment. The reason, presumably, is that it is fairly well settled that Congress enjoys very broad authority to determine what constitutes either literal slavery or, to use the language of Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., a "badge or incident of slavery" falling within the Amendment's …